So now trump is wanting to know who the sources of information are and talks of likening them to spies and mentions what were done to spies "in the old days."
JFC.
JFC.
Follow this
- Thread starter countryroads89_rivals
- Start date
A leading candidate running for President of the United States is involved in possible corruption involving his son, we need to investigate that. We should hire a firm.... I don't know... like a Fusion GPS... to put together a dossier outlining all the activities and we should investigate.
Maybe one of trump's primary challengers will hire Fusion, or a firm like them? Like last time?
So even though Poroshenko wasn't investigating Burisma, you think Joe did something crooked? Help me with your logic.
BS. So if Elizabeth Warren goes to Moscow to get evidence that trump may have committed crimes, you are ok with it?
That's why need to investigate. We have to find out whether or not something is up.... gotta "get to the bottom of this".
Is she the President of the US working with the head of the DOJ and the crimes/corruption took place in Russia? If so, yes.
I'm not sure if Joe actually committed a crime......that's what people in power have been doing for eons. BUT.....we may have to call it a crime if Trump is found guilty of doing a similar thing.
Explaining that it takes a 2/3rd majority of Senators to remove a sitting President to country is like explaining you don't make donations to charity and not claim them on your income taxes.
Both concepts are too difficult for that poster to understand.
I'm NOT Elmer Fudd....I'm a GOOBER! So get it right! Oh, having trouble?
Just look at my hat!!!!!
