Agreed - Fitz is nowhere near the athlete Hill is. But there's little risk to bringing Fitz to camp, and if he's good enough to be your 3rd QB, maybe you can also use him elsewhere on the field or in red zone read options (hahahaha), to actually get some production out of that roster spot instead of a clipboard holder.
100%, but I genuinely don't believe he was invited to camp to compete at rookie camp as a QB when #2 is a seasoned NFL veteran (former 1st rounder) and #3 a minimum salary player who's going on his 7th NFL season, 5th with the team (also 5th in the same QB room with Winston).
#1-3 are the same archetype, there are no other QB comparisons in the NFC South to warrant carrying him on the practice squad for scouting purposes, and his signing bonus doesn't say "we think he can be the next Tony Romo". I have enough respect for Nick to say I think they think he can be either a full-time skill player (i.e. WR) or provide options at WR and 1 or 2 other spots (special teams?). But if we're cheering for him to be QB3, some of you laughing at Bo Wallace holding the clipboard at EMCC will need to backtrack.
Comparing him to Hill though is lunacy, because it's lunacy for a player like Hill to exist and for the Saints to have ever carried him on a 53-man roster in the first place. I'm glad it's worked out to this point but we're reliant on our 3rd string QB blocking punts (he's legitimately out there blocking punts). This is classic New Orleans Saints blows-up-in-your-face. Brees and Bridgewater are both going to go down when we're 15-0 or something and our QB3, the only player available or capable of taking the playbook into the playoffs, is a glorified slot receiver with bad hands.