But Lovie #5? Wow......
http://collegefootballnews.com/2016...h-rank-drafting-big-ten-head-football-coaches
http://collegefootballnews.com/2016...h-rank-drafting-big-ten-head-football-coaches
James Franklin at 4? This list is stupid
James Franklin at 4? This list is stupid
What a horrible list.
1. DantoniHow would you rank 'em then?
Franklin I think is just over hyped penn st with all their tradition has constantly under performed with him there.
Sure.
Agree and He will have to prove on the recruiting road. Remember, recruiting is #1, #2 and #3 in winning at the collegiate level.Too early to tell on Lovie. Adds instant credibility for the program, but that doesn't mean he'll adapt to being a HC at the college level, which is more about sheer force of personality than anything else.
this...sounds...strangely familiarI mean I don't like the guy either but if we had a coach going into his 3rd year we'd all be yelling about how you can't judge him until he gets his recruits into the program, etc.
How would you rank 'em then?
1. Dantoni
2. Meyer
3. Harbaugh
4. Ferentz
5. Fitz
6. Lovie
7. Wilson
8. Chryst
9. Franklin
10. Riley
11. Claeys
12. Hazel
HEY!!! What about my list? It was basically the same.This list looks pretty good.
Come on man.... I can't agree with you on everything now can I?HEY!!! What about my list? It was basically the same.
Yeah, I was debating those two. Franklin/Chryst gave me more struggle, but Fitz/Lovie was a debate for me. I had to give it to Lovie as he's made a Super Bowl, and I'm ready to move him down when I see his recruiting, development of college players, and ability to scheme within the confines of college player's athletic ability.Come on man.... I can't agree with you on everything now can I?
Actually, looking back, I think it was because you had Lovie ahead of Fitz. Lovie needs to prove something on the collegiate level before putting him ahead of Fitz who I think is one of the best damn CEOs of a college football program in the country - which is a huge part of the head coach's job.
Sorry maybe I shouldn't have said constantly but given the talent on the teams I figured if he was a better game coach he woulda won a few more games"Constantly" for 2 seasons?
Yeah ours were very similar but I had a problem with Lovie over Fitz right now maybe later but he hasn't proven anything at Illinois yetHEY!!! What about my list? It was basically the same.
Sure.
I actually would put Urban 1 and Dantonio 2, but otherwise I agreed with all of his list. Fitz 5 is right I think, I would put him ahead of Lovie for now. And Chryst ahead of Franklin for sure. If I had to make a second revision I would move Chryst above Wilson and Lovie I think.Come on man.... I can't agree with you on everything now can I?
Actually, looking back, I think it was because you had Lovie ahead of Fitz. Lovie needs to prove something on the collegiate level before putting him ahead of Fitz who I think is one of the best damn CEOs of a college football program in the country - which is a huge part of the head coach's job.
(Mostly cause while Wilson is a very good offensive coach, he still has not yet once found a way to field a halfway respectable defense)I actually would put Urban 1 and Dantonio 2, but otherwise I agreed with all of his list. Fitz 5 is right I think, I would put him ahead of Lovie for now. And Chryst ahead of Franklin for sure. If I had to make a second revision I would move Chryst above Wilson and Lovie I think.
The reasoning for me putting Dantonio 1 is because of how he developed his talent and now that he is recruiting similar talent to what Urban is getting I expect MSU to continue to get betterI actually would put Urban 1 and Dantonio 2, but otherwise I agreed with all of his list. Fitz 5 is right I think, I would put him ahead of Lovie for now. And Chryst ahead of Franklin for sure. If I had to make a second revision I would move Chryst above Wilson and Lovie I think.
Dantonio is a great coach, but he's number 3. Dantonio would have the best team in the country if he brought in top five recruiting classes, but he can't.The reasoning for me putting Dantonio 1 is because of how he developed his talent and now that he is recruiting similar talent to what Urban is getting I expect MSU to continue to get better
I can't understand why Lovie is even in the conversation or on the list. He has not won a single college game as a HC and won't until at least this coming fall.Yeah ours were very similar but I had a problem with Lovie over Fitz right now maybe later but he hasn't proven anything at Illinois yet
Because I feel that an NFL coach look appealing to recruits and that will lead to better talent and that should lead to an improvement of what is now a dumpster fire of an Illinois football programI can't understand why Lovie is even in the conversation or on the list. He has not won a single college game as a HC and won't until at least this coming fall.
Maybe but putting a coach who has never won a college game in a poll of who's the best, is pure fallacy.Because I feel that an NFL coach look appealing to recruits and that will lead to better talent and that should lead to an improvement of what is now a dumpster fire of an Illinois football program
Now that I have heard this and other points it has made me rethink and I would move Meyer ahead of him because of the success he has had at the program and that is why Harbaugh is still 3 there is always ways to move yourself around on the list but if you look at program success it is hard to move Dantonio below 2Dantonio is a great coach, but he's number 3. Dantonio would have the best team in the country if he brought in top five recruiting classes, but he can't.
Both for NU's good and because I'm interested, I would love to see Dantonio get a job at Florida or Texas or USC - I think he'd win national titles given the in-state talent and tradition at those places.
He went to superbowl and coached at the professional level so it is not like he hasn't proven himself at least at some level.Maybe but putting a coach who has never won a college game in a poll of who's the best, is pure fallacy.
#7 is too high.
Dude, this thread has been dormant for 9 months!