No, he said his involvement was made up.So have I. Biff, on the other hand, said it's a 'made up story'.
No, he said his involvement was made up.So have I. Biff, on the other hand, said it's a 'made up story'.
Everyone of them have, numerous times.No you didn't. You clearly said that Trump colluded with Russia to win the election. Stop lying.
Bingo. She beautifully explained this. Their intent is to destabilize our faith in govt, regardless of who is in power.
What is the impeachable offense here then?
Is that what the deepstate stuff is about, support of the government? Both sides are guilty in this.It’s basically what we on the right have been saying since Jan of 2016. And you guys went all in on it.
With respect to the Ukraine question? I think it would come down to an abuse of power claim - using the power of the office for personal gain. That's if they can show it.What is the impeachable offense here then?
With respect to the Ukraine question? I think it would come down to an abuse of power claim - using the power of the office for personal gain. That's if they can show it.
They have the numbers so now it's will they stupid enough to do it ?
Not sure. They were stupid enough to hold these sham hearings. They may be stupid enough to commit political suicide. They do like heir jobs. Enough to lose them?
We'll see. Trump's not going anywhere if they do impeach him, but they sure will be.
One womans garbage is about to be anothers ticket to clinkvilleFiona Hill just said Steele's dossier was garbage.
News Flash ..... the same thing they’ve been doing for the last 60 years.This is where I think part of Hill's testimony was really good. She pointed out that it didn't matter who won the 2016 election. The Russians were trying to pit folks against each other and raise questions as to the validity of the results. It would have been the same problem if the election results were different.
That's a great claim, but how do you measure that? How do you measure the opposite, that they did change some votes?
This is where I think part of Hill's testimony was really good. She pointed out that it didn't matter who won the 2016 election. The Russians were trying to pit folks against each other and raise questions as to the validity of the results. It would have been the same problem if the election results were different.
With respect to these hearings, they are about a different issue related to Ukraine.
I presume you have no idea of what you say.....!He is asking a bunch of questions trying to tie either of these two to the Steel Dossier and getting zero.
There are actually moments where you can see him, non-verbally squirm to the point where you know he is thinking, "oh my god, I wished I wouldn't have asked that question. I hope Dr. Hill would just stop answering the question because this is horrible."
HAHAHAHAHAHA.
I presume you have no idea of what you say.....!
Lifelong bureaucrats doing their own thing while ignoring the will of the sitting President.......Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa..Not surprised at all @WVU82 .Some of these witnesses Schiff called are as corrupt a bunch of liars as he is as well as the Ukrainians they're covering for!
Instead of investigating if there was corruption in Ukraine, we should have been trying to determine how deep it goes? We know it found a home with some of these witnesses.[eyeroll]