Nebraska wins by 17. Not really that close. Their D would struggle against our offense. We would not with theirs.It's a shame that it wasn't settled on the field. Michigan had a better defense while Nebraska had a better offense. Nebraska probably wins, but likely in a close defensive battle. However, no one knows, that's why you play the game.
Yep, something like 31-7.Nebraska wins by 17. Not really that close. Their D would struggle against our offense. We would not with theirs.
It's not Peyton Manning vs Ryan Leaf, it's Washington St. vs Tennessee. It's a team sport, not an individual one.I thought the Peyton Manning vs Ryan Leaf debate was settled a quarter century ago? Are we debating it again?
Washington st should have played TennesseTennessee was overrated and Washington St. was underrated that season.
Yeah that was probably the scenario that finally convinced the Blowhard Ten to stop hiding in the Grandaddy of Them All and join modern college football.They didn't dodge playing Nebraska. They were locked into a contract to play the Pac 10 champion in the Rose Bowl, they couldn't play Nebraska without breaching their contract
Is that the reason why Tennessee was ranked #3 and WSU was ranked 8th heading into the bowl games..Tennessee was overrated and Washington St. was underrated that season.
Our defense struggled against Missouri that year, a team Michigan would have literally killed.Nebraska wins by 17. Not really that close. Their D would struggle against our offense. We would not with theirs.
Saved Michigan that year. 94 Penn State had a better shot vs 94 Nebraska.Yeah that was probably the scenario that finally convinced the Blowhard Ten to stop hiding in the Grandaddy of Them All and join modern college football.
And Michigan struggled against Washington State that year, a team Nebraska would have beat by around 57 points.Our defense struggled against Missouri that year, a team Michigan would have literally killed.
Nebraska goes undefeated regardless of your imagination.Our defense struggled against Missouri that year, a team Michigan would have literally killed.
I would agree. If two teams finished undefeated and didn't play each other, it was pretty much a media popularity contest to determine which undefeated team should get the championship.Saved Michigan that year. 94 Penn State had a better shot vs 94 Nebraska.
Nebraska couldn't beat flipping Missouri by 57 points? What makes you think they could have beaten Washington St. by that much?And Michigan struggled against Washington State that year, a team Nebraska would have beat by around 57 points.
I would agree. They likely aren't going to win this game.Getting back to this game, Michigan has had the ball 3 times inside the 5 and came away with 3 points. That's a losing recipe.
For some reason I thought this was the thread to post unfounded personal opinions about 1997. I actually think they would have beat Washington Lite by 60.Nebraska couldn't beat flipping Missouri by 57 points? What makes you think they could have beaten Washington St. by that much?
Wild 3rd quarter but Michigan has only cut into the lead by 3just when i think it's over
You're clueless. You don't have a good memory. Look at Tennessee's roster: Manning, Leonard Little, Trey Teague, Terry Fair, Marcus Nash, Jamaal Lewis, Al Wilson, Travis Henry, Peerless Price, Shaun Ellis, to name a few. This team was the 2nd best team in the country easily and Nebraska made them look like a high school squad.Our defense struggled against Missouri that year, a team Michigan would have literally killed.
Hope so, but TCU’s pass defense is not holding up very well. Frogs need to stay aggressive on offense.It's over, barring a complete collapse. Go Fighting Duggans!