Farenheit 11/9

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Moore's documentaries are excellent.

Moore's viewpoints are controversial. Some are completely offbase in my view. But he does make great films and makes one think about the topic.
 

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
Moore's documentaries are excellent.

Moore's viewpoints are controversial. Some are completely offbase in my view. But he does make great films and makes one think about the topic.

WV is a big part of this documentary
 

op2

All-Conference
Mar 16, 2014
11,689
1,293
103
I think movies (documentaries) are in inherently bad way to learn about things. They're too intellectually passive. You sit and watch and the moviemaker controls everything and of course it's easy for them to put whatever spin they like on it. It's too easy to emotionally carried away. That's why movies are good for fiction, where they draw you in emotionally.

All that said, even if I did think documentaries are okay as a genre I wouldn't be a fan of Michael Moore. I saw "Roger and Me." Ever see that? I thought it was very good when I watched it, back before I realized that documentaries were a bad way to learn. But what really eventually turned me off Moore was when I learned, about 20 years later, that he had already interviewed Roger Smith (twice) when he made that movie. And the whole movie was about how Roger Smith wouldn't do an interview with him. Feeling duped? You should.
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
I think movies (documentaries) are in inherently bad way to learn about things. They're too intellectually passive. You sit and watch and the moviemaker controls everything and of course it's easy for them to put whatever spin they like on it. It's too easy to emotionally carried away. That's why movies are good for fiction, where they draw you in emotionally.I

All that said, even if I did think documentaries are okay as a genre I wouldn't be a fan of Michael Moore. I saw "Roger and Me." Ever see that? I thought it was very good when I watched it, back before I realized that documentaries were a bad way to learn. But what really eventually turned me off Moore was when I learned, about 20 years later, that he had already interviewed Roger Smith (twice) when he made that movie. And the whole movie was about how Roger Smith wouldn't do an interview with him. Feeling duped? You should.
Yes, individuals should learn from legitimate, fact driven sources. Documentaries, tweets from talking heads, message boards, Facebook, etc. are nothing more than opportunities to present half-truths from agenda-driven individuals in order to win over someone else mostly using emotion. Basically, Trump's entire campaigning style can be thrown into that arena as well.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
Yes, individuals should learn from legitimate, fact driven sources. Documentaries, tweets from talking heads, message boards, Facebook, etc. are nothing more than opportunities to present half-truths from agenda-driven individuals in order to win over someone else mostly using emotion. Basically, Trump's entire campaigning style can be thrown into that arena as well.
Do you recall what you posted in this thread about 3 hours ago?
 

WVUBRU

Freshman
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Yes, I said Moore made good documentaries and he makes you think. Good movie makers will make one think. Thinking doesn't equal learning which is the point of my second post in this thread. Two different human actions. One can think about a subject without being a believer in the subject. Hell, I do it here all the time. Many good posts from individuals that makes one think and I tend to "like" those.