EXPOSE IT ALL

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
11,101
17,699
113
But wait a minute...its a different subject but Tulsi has released the goods on the Ukraine bio labs and the left media and libs in general just ignore it. She is not just a random poster.
Agreed, she is (was) head of National Intelligence. A person with no background in the field, but was nominated ONLY b/c of her loyalty to Trump. We've seen this game before. Remember the head of ICE and Kristy Noem telling us how those folks that ICE killed were attacking the ICE officers and trying to start a mass casualty minutes after it happened, even though cameras showed it was BS? Rember the Head of the FBI telling you that you can't bring a licenced firearm to a protest? Remember the former AG testifying before congress and telling us that the POTUS was the greatest POTUS ever and that the DOW was in record territory right before she told congress how she was completely impartial and the POTUS didn't influence her?

Unfortunately, these folks don't exactly have a reputation for honesty. So Tulsi has little more credibility than a random tweeter, ESPECIALLY as she's headed out the door and doesn't have to answer for her actions. As usual, I'll wait on the courts to decide.
 

alaskanseminole

Heisman
Oct 20, 2002
245,315
11,478
103
Fraud for what?
Nobody Knows GIF
 
  • Love
Reactions: Twoooooo

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,429
35,515
113
Agreed, she is (was) head of National Intelligence. A person with no background in the field, but was nominated ONLY b/c of her loyalty to Trump. We've seen this game before. Remember the head of ICE and Kristy Noem telling us how those folks that ICE killed were attacking the ICE officers and trying to start a mass casualty minutes after it happened, even though cameras showed it was BS? Rember the Head of the FBI telling you that you can't bring a licenced firearm to a protest? Remember the former AG testifying before congress and telling us that the POTUS was the greatest POTUS ever and that the DOW was in record territory right before she told congress how she was completely impartial and the POTUS didn't influence her?

Unfortunately, these folks don't exactly have a reputation for honesty. So Tulsi has little more credibility than a random tweeter, ESPECIALLY as she's headed out the door and doesn't have to answer for her actions. As usual, I'll wait on the courts to decide.
This is peak lib rationalization. Well done.
 

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
11,101
17,699
113
This is peak lib rationalization. Well done.
Well, I'd call it a clear case of "The boy who cried wolf." You have a POTUS that lies and blusters all the time. He says things that aren't true and he says he's going to do things that he doesn't. His staff take their cues from him (see examples above). So people are more than justified to question what they say. She COULD be telling the truth, I can agree with that. She also could be lying. You know, like Rudy making up that stuff about those two election workers in Ga. You have no way of knowing, so you just have to wait and see. An unfortunate situation where you can't count on major leaders in our Government to honor their word, but here we are.