Ethics commission rules in Steve's favor

[Col. Forbin]

OM was found to have violated the Open Records Act by denying access to the NOA, the amended NOA, and the boosters names.

 

[bigiron.sixpack]

This is a bad look for the Ethics Commission.**

 

[DogStuckAtUM.sixpack]

Let there be light!

via GIPHY

 

[jb1020]

Whats the penalty if they dont

release any names? Cause I still don't buy that we're getting a list of names next Monday.

 

[Willow Grove Dawg]

I think it is $100 per day per violation & they would date back to January of 2016

 

[thatsbaseball]

Well if they can buy their way out of it we'll never see names

 

[QuadrupleOption]

They'll rue the day they tried to apply ethics to Ole Miss athletics.***

 

[ShrubDog]

OM was found to have violated the Open Records Act by denying access to the NOA, the amended NOA, and the boosters names.

Is there rule that OM has not violated in the past 20 years?

 

[DerHntr]

I think it is $100 per day per violation & they would date back to January of 2016

The folks wanting their names out of the papers would pay that bill for OM in a heartbeat.

 

[tatedog]

We always knew we were morally, spiritually, and ethically superior to them. It is nice to finally have something in writing to prove it.

 

[patdog]

I think it is $100 per day per violation & they would date back to January of 2016

That would still only be about $50,000. Well worth every penny to them if there are names they want to hide.

 

[tatedog]

That would still only be about $50,000. Well worth every penny to them if there are names they want to hide.

Is there any way to make sure responsible parties pay for this and not tax payers?

 

[The_Pylon]

per page

I think it is $100 per day per violation & they would date back to January of 2016

iirc

 

[BiscuitEater]

OM was found to have violated the Open Records Act by denying access to the NOA, the amended NOA, and the boosters names.

Can't wait to read all about it in the Clarion Ledger. Oh wait .. They WON'T Print the Names even if they had them. Which is okay 'cause I don't read the CL anyway.

 

[IBleedMaroonDawg]

OM was found to have violated the Open Records Act by denying access to the NOA, the amended NOA, and the boosters names.

View attachment 6688

 

[Wizard of bulldogery]

That would still only be about $50,000. Well worth every penny to them if there are names they want to hide.

steve said there were 2 documents so 100 for each one... still not much but it is bad press.