ESPN predicts 4-4 record

Sodakred

All-Conference
Jul 31, 2018
3,033
1,204
113
Ok ESPN hates farmers etc etc but if they are right is that ok for year 3 of this regime?
 

ATX Husker

Redshirt
Feb 12, 2020
1,785
0
0
Sign me up for 5-3 or 6-2 and a chance to pad it in the crossover championship game and bowl game....
 

TampaBaySkers

Senior
Oct 30, 2010
18,392
527
103
4-4 is certainly fair and very likely. I still hope we can start the season 1-1, and maybe finish 5-3 or 6-2.
 

Hford

Redshirt
Aug 11, 2020
1,959
3
0
5 of our 8 games are against preseason top 25 teams so I think 4-4 would be solid for this team.
 

EastOregonHusker

Redshirt
Jul 2, 2020
333
0
0
It would be difficult to argue that we showed anything on the field last year that should lead any analyst to believe we will be better than 4-4 this year.
 

Husker4real_rivals373787

All-Conference
Nov 25, 2017
3,118
1,091
0
If we start 1-1; 4-4 is disappointing. If we start 0-2, 4-4 would feel pretty good. But as others have said, 4-4 with this schedule would not feel bad in any case. I would actually extrapolate that out to 7-5 or 8-4 if we had played our original schedule. That would represent a 3rd straight year of progress.

It would also feel good to get all 8 games in.
 

vs540husker

Heisman
Oct 3, 2004
92,067
10,221
0
4-4 would be an improvement over going below .500 the previous few years.
With the schedule, injuries, youth on the D-line, and only having one proven WR...4-4 is decent.
 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
6-3 this year to just tie the ridiculously high mark for conference wins set by Mike Riley in his three illustrious years at Neb

to think in year 3 - 4 conference wins - a mere improvement of just a single conference win over Riley in 2017 would in any way be heralded as any type of achievement is truly remarkable
 

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
33,086
11,099
113
It would be difficult to argue that we showed anything on the field last year that should lead any analyst to believe we will be better than 4-4 this year.

Last year we were terrible on special teams and with better QB play you can’t compare this season to last season..
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,508
20,877
113
6-3 this year to just tie the ridiculously high mark for conference wins set by Mike Riley

to think in year 3 - 4 conference wins - a mere improvement of just a single conference win over Riley in 2017 would in any way be heralded as any type of achievement is truly remarkable
Go away, Troll.
 

NorthWillRiseAgain

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2004
8,760
4,757
113
That would be the best we’ve done in conference under Frost, with arguably the toughest conference schedule in those 3 years, so yes.
 

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
33,086
11,099
113
6-3 this year to just tie the ridiculously high mark for conference wins set by Mike Riley in his three illustrious years at Neb

to think in year 3 - 4 conference wins - a mere improvement of just a single conference win over Riley in 2017 would in any way be heralded as any type of achievement is truly remarkable

You just love humping the Riley bandwagon..

With your protégé still being here we’d be lucky to win one game.
 

Crazyhole

All-American
Jun 4, 2004
27,841
9,769
0
I get that we have been pretty down for the last 5 years, but .500 is still not a record I would be happy with regardless of our schedule.
 

cubsker_rivals142943

All-Conference
May 29, 2003
18,603
3,797
0
We shouldn't be losing to iowa, nw, purdont, or illy. Should win one of the other 4 at a minimum. 5-3 should be the floor of expectations.
 

73 Red I

All-Conference
Nov 25, 2007
5,522
2,877
113
It would be difficult to argue that we showed anything on the field last year that should lead any analyst to believe we will be better than 4-4 this year.
So much has changed from last year.1) Center has a year under his belt. 2) OL has depth and should be improved. 3) Receiving corps should be improved hopefully with some that want to block. 3) Starting running back came on strong last year and should be 800 yard rusher if he stays healthy. 4) The Washington experiment is in the rear view mirror. 5) New OC and run game coordinator that will hopefully get rid of some gadgets that didn't work. 6) An addition to the TE group that should make it more of a weapon. 7) Third year in the defensive scheme. That's the longest the Huskers have had continuity of coaches on that side of the ball in what seems like a decade. 8) Two qb that should leave little dropoff in performance in case of injury and there will be injuries.
 

redfanusa

All-Conference
Feb 6, 2009
4,892
1,607
0
I'm considering the entire season and asterisk for all of college football, so all I really care about is to see a team that looks well-coached, motivated, and as sharp as is reasonable considering the jacked up fall camp schedule.
 

nu2u

All-Conference
Aug 10, 2006
10,241
2,305
113
ESPN's Football Power Index from 9/21:

Opponent - chance of N win
OSU - 04.6%
Wi - 12.5%
NW - 34.5%
PSU - 17.4%
ILL - 66.4%
IA - 36.2%
Pur - 59-1%
MN - ---- (no odds)

If you buy into ESPN's FPI, 4-4 would be a good outcome.
 

TampaBaySkers

Senior
Oct 30, 2010
18,392
527
103
6-3 this year to just tie the ridiculously high mark for conference wins set by Mike Riley in his three illustrious years at Neb

to think in year 3 - 4 conference wins - a mere improvement of just a single conference win over Riley in 2017 would in any way be heralded as any type of achievement is truly remarkable

Mike - we get you're upset. Time to move on, we have. You were a career loser that got by because he was nice.

 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
In Mike Riley's 3 years - he played a total of 7 big ten teams that finished the season in the AP top 10

in Frost's first 2 years - he has played 3


4 big ten teams on the schedule would need to finish the season in the top ten for the 2 coaches to have faced a similar schedule of elite conference opponents in their first 3 years .. but by all means keep hedging by claiming Frost has such a tougher schedule
 
Last edited:

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,508
20,877
113
So much has changed from last year.1) Center has a year under his belt. 2) OL has depth and should be improved. 3) Receiving corps should be improved hopefully with some that want to block. 3) Starting running back came on strong last year and should be 800 yard rusher if he stays healthy. 4) The Washington experiment is in the rear view mirror. 5) New OC and run game coordinator that will hopefully get rid of some gadgets that didn't work. 6) An addition to the TE group that should make it more of a weapon. 7) Third year in the defensive scheme. That's the longest the Huskers have had continuity of coaches on that side of the ball in what seems like a decade. 8) Two qb that should leave little dropoff in performance in case of injury and there will be injuries.
I’m with you on the offense and I think we will be vastly improved on special teams. However, I’m pretty skeptical we see improvement on the defensive side.
 

Rcnut223

Sophomore
Apr 22, 2004
1,685
108
63
ESPN's Football Power Index from 9/21:

Opponent - chance of N win
OSU - 04.6%
Wi - 12.5%
NW - 34.5%
PSU - 17.4%
ILL - 66.4%
IA - 36.2%
Pur - 59-1%
MN - ---- (no odds)

If you buy into ESPN's FPI, 4-4 would be a good outcome.
Looks like 2-6 is more likely , given these odds

Can we beat NW and either Iowa or Minnesota?
 

Redscarlet

Heisman
Jun 17, 2001
33,086
11,099
113
In Mike Riley's 3 years - he played a total of 7 big ten teams that finished the season in the AP top 10

in Frost's first 2 years - he has played 3


4 big ten teams on the schedule would need to finish the season in the top ten for the 2 coaches to have faced a similar schedule of elite conference opponents in their first 3 years .. but by all means keep hedging by claiming Frost has such a tougher schedule

Sick
 

Hawk4Life

Senior
Iowa Swarm member
Sep 11, 2018
623
970
93
While I think we'll be improved this year, I just don't know where the wins come from. We very easily could be 1 - 3 to start. If we can split the last 4, we're still only 3 - 5.

@Ohio State - currently #5
Wisconsin - currently #14
@NW - certainly winnable, but on the road
PSU - currently #8
llinois - gotta get this one
@Iowa - toss up game - on the road
@Purdue - winnable, but on the road
Minnesota - tough game, but at home
Playoffs
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,508
20,877
113
the numbers are, indeed, quite disquieting

It’s always disenchanting when the data get in the way of a good yarn
Would someone please point this dipshit to the Iowa board, he may find someone over there that cares.
 
Dec 8, 2014
815
294
0
We'll know more about the team in 2 weeks, but at this point I feel 4-4 is our ceiling. 3-5 is probably more realistic, IMO.
 

Rick.Shaw1

Freshman
May 29, 2001
8,283
83
0
While I think we'll be improved this year, I just don't know where the wins come from. We very easily could be 1 - 3 to start. If we can split the last 4, we're still only 3 - 5.

@Ohio State - currently #5
Wisconsin - currently #14
@NW - certainly winnable, but on the road
PSU - currently #8
llinois - gotta get this one
@Iowa - toss up game - on the road
@Purdue - winnable, but on the road
Minnesota - tough game, but at home
Playoffs
If I had to bet my life on it....I would put it on a 1-3 start. Tough road.