Easy question for NYC_Eer

[atlkvb]

It's actually so easy you can pick your question, and a simple "Yes" or "No" will suffice as your answer. Purpose of this exercise? I want to see if you are NOT a "gullible moron" as you often accuse others on this forum for swallowing totally "fake news" or "Twitter tattle".

Question: (your choice)
Was Trump, given all the information you've been exposed to... guilty of "collusion" with the Russians?

or

Was it a totally fabricated, made up, bought-and-paid-for Democrat/Hillary sponsored media-hyped scam?

"Yes" or "No"?

@NYC_Eer

"Sorry atl....that's an easy one for me.... you know I'm gullible."

Man look at @NYC_Eer RUN?????????

 

[NYC_Eer]

Question: (your choice)
Was Trump, given all the information you've been exposed to... guilty of "collusion" with the Russians?

or

Was it a totally fabricated, made up, bought-and-paid-for Democrat/Hillary sponsored media-hyped scam?

1) No
2) No

 

[Airport]

1) No
2) No

Where do you think the info came from now that Durham is starting to indicate that people involved with the DNC were involved?

 

[atlkvb]

1) No
2) No

Hey that's good my Man! You are correct on your answer to #1. Good job @NYC_Eer

As for #2, could you please link me to your backup proving it was not a totally fabricated, bought-and-paid for media hyped scam? (You answered it was not correct?)


Maybe I missed what you found out?

 

[NYC_Eer]

Hey that's good my Man! You are correct on your answer to #1. Good job @NYC_Eer

As for #2, could you please link me to your backup proving it was not a totally fabricated, bought-and-paid for media hyped scam? (You answered it was not correct?)


Maybe I missed what you found out?

Get a life. The difference here is I know very well many sources of info are biased, and that just about anything you see on social media is outright false. Unlike many on here, who pass on info from Twitter sources like Catturd and dudes w/ anime avatars, I pay attention to my sources of info and don't just believe it and forward it along.

 

[atlkvb]

Get a life.

No...no wait a minute now! You were brave enough to answer this thread proving you don't "run off" when asked questions you can't back up...so don't go all "metrosexual" on me telling me to "get a Life"! You answered my call out to you trying to prove you're not what you call others on this forum...I believe the word was "gullible" correct? I even gave you credit for answering one of my "easy" questions.

Good job!

Now, finish what you started Bro. You correctly answered Trump did NOT collude with the Russians as charged, yet you also answered it was NOT a totally made up bought-and-paid-for media hyped scam did you not? OK, so all I'm asking now is for you to back that up! What have you read or saw that convinces you any aspect of that bought-and-paid-for media hyped scam was correct? I'm only asking you to back up what's behind your answer.

Can you?

Get a life.

Guess I have my answer????

 

[atlkvb]

The difference here is I know very well many sources of info are biased, and that just about anything you see on social media is outright false. Unlike many on here, who pass on info from Twitter sources like Catturd and dudes w/ anime avatars, I pay attention to my sources of info and don't just believe it and forward it along.

OK....so back up your sources indicating what parts of the "collusion" scam you know to be correct? Stand behind what you're saying here. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm asking you to back it up.

Link me. I'll give you your props if what you offer is on the up-and-up. I don't think you can, so why are you saying it?

@NYC_Eer asking for clarification on his "sources"

 

[atlkvb]

@NYC_Eer has left the thread, but he'll pop back in just to prove he's not doing this.... refusing to defend what part of the Trump "collusion" with Russians scam was true?

Running away from that question is not an answer @NYC_Eer

@NYC_Eer admitting he can't back up what he says

 

[atlkvb]

Oh look!!!!!....Here comes @NYC_Eer ...maybe coming back to answer that question in post #7 ?????

back up your sources indicating what parts of the "collusion" scam you know to be correct?

Oh Damn....he kept going.....

See 'ya later Bro..... :joy:

 

[Darth_VadEER]

1) No
2) No

At this point its nearly impossible to deny that it wasn't a manufactured political hit...

 

[bornaneer]

Get a life. The difference here is I know very well many sources of info are biased, and that just about anything you see on social media is outright false. Unlike many on here, who pass on info from Twitter sources like Catturd and dudes w/ anime avatars, I pay attention to my sources of info and don't just believe it and forward it along.

I'm sure and believe that Trump was mining for info anywhere he could get it....just like almost all politician at that level do.

The difference in Trumps case is that most of the media were trying very hard to push the Clinton/Democrat narrative while paying little to no attention to Trumps and Repub claims of what Clintons operatives were doing.

 

[atlkvb]

At this point its nearly impossible to deny that it wasn't a manufactured political hit...

All of the hard evidence on that points in only one direction. Towards the "wicked Witch of the West" and her "flying Monkeys" on the Left.

Hillary plans to get Trump

One of my best moments!

 

[atlkvb]

I'm sure and believe that Trump was mining for info anywhere he could get it....just like almost all politician at that level do.

The difference in Trumps case is that most of the media were trying very hard to push the Clinton/Democrat narrative while paying little to no attention to Trumps and Repub claims of what Clintons operatives were doing.

For as much as they accused him of "colluding" they are now virtually ignoring who was actually doing most of it!

Scoundrels.

 

[roadtrasheer]

I'm sure and believe that Trump was mining for info anywhere he could get it....just like almost all politician at that level do.

The difference in Trumps case is that most of the media were trying very hard to push the Clinton/Democrat narrative while paying little to no attention to Trumps and Repub claims of what Clintons operatives were doing.

Big difference is Democrats fabricated a story & our government & MSM went along with it . All politicians look for dirt , Democrats plant it or make it up .

 

[JWG66]

Big difference is Democrats fabricated a story & our government & MSM went along with it . All politicians look for dirt , Democrats plant it or make it up .

Play #5 in the playbook. Accuse the opponent of that which you do yourself. Was effective since Mueller was monitoring every action DJT took trying to tie it to collusion. Sure helped to get rid of that limp noodle Sessions.

 

[atlkvb]

Play #5 in the playbook. Accuse the opponent of that which you do yourself. Was effective since Mueller was monitoring every action DJT took trying to tie it to collusion. Sure helped to get rid of that limp noodle Sessions.

Trump's innocence wasn't "in my purview"...smearing him was!

 

[atlkvb]

NYC Eer never came back to this thread! Damn...that was roughly three weeks ago and Brother man is STILL runnin'...

Yup...in fact you may NEVER see me again atl....

@NYC_Eer making tracks....

I really do enjoy chasing him away though :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye: