Seeding for basketball is done because it's a SECTIONAL complex, and the 16-19 teams in the sectional, especially in the Chicago area, are all from a close geographic area. Even if Team A hasn't played Team B, it's overwhelmingly likely that Team A has played Teams CDEF and Team B has played Teams CDEF so there is familiarity and a way to compare.
What does anybody know about a team in the NIC-10 or the Fox Valley ... closed conferences. Or the Upstate Eight, where one team dominates every year to the tune of 8-1 or 9-0 but has yet to be a late-November participant.
The current formula works because it's totally objective. There is NO personal opinion by anybody put into it. So going into Week 9 of the season, every. one of the 500 schools playing knows what the playoff situation is, which also is good for interested fans of each team.
I guarentee there will be a 5-4 team at the end of October that has zero business being in the playoffs (hello CPL, for example) but gets in because of a victory Week 9. Imagine Week 9, winning to go to 5-4 or 6-3 but because you play in the CPL, you aren't invited. That becomes subjective which is where problems come up.
Is Nazareth (4 losses to teams a combined 16-0 this fall) gonna take a hit this fall? You bet. But they knew the rules going in. I mean, in terms of a subjective ranking, how many games are they allowed to lose and still make the playoffs? 7? 6? 8?
I do have a question about East St. Louis. Because the Flyers will finish 6-2 and not 7-2 or 6-3, where do they fall in the list of qualified teams. Are they seeded ahead of all 6-3 teams in the southern half of the state with a 6-2 mark, or are all 6-win teams created equal and they get aligned for seeding purposes by the proverbial "playoff points" system. In that case, East St. Louis could likely be seeded worse than many 6-3 teams because they will only get playoff points from 8 opponents' wins and not 9.