Dylan Raiola

Husker.Wed._rivals

All-Conference
Feb 13, 2004
17,648
3,699
98
Only in Kong’s mind!
And mine. No doubt in my mind with proper development and given a chance he could have played as well as Thompson last year, plus added a running element. I mean comon, Thompson dropped back, threw the ball a mile and Palmer ran under it. Haarberg could have done that.
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,108
2,382
98
IMO even with our losses we have a very talented RB and WR room. Washington and ALANTE Brown are very talented guys. I emphasized Brown because I think he’ll blow up this year
I will give talented but "very talented" is yet to be determined. What do you base it on, especially for the WRs? Brown almost completely disappeared at times, Washington wasn't what I would call dependable. Perhaps a better OK will help our RBs. Still no 1,000 yard rusher since Devine? That should be against the law in Nebraska. One RB, Allen went down early, after that you have one guy who was ineffective later in the year.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,386
12,800
78
I will give talented but "very talented" is yet to be determined. What do you base it on, especially for the WRs? Brown almost completely disappeared at times, Washington wasn't what I would call dependable. Perhaps a better OK will help our RBs. Still no 1,000 yard rusher since Devine? That should be against the law in Nebraska. One RB, Allen went down early, after that you have one guy who was ineffective later in the year.
Brown only “disappeared” because our QBs locked in mostly on Washington and Palmer. Then add in Tommi Hill’s speed and we have some options. I fully expect we’ll have several newcomers see significant snaps at WR as well. I have zero concerns about WR now.
 
Sep 29, 2001
75,439
12,977
0
Brown only “disappeared” because our QBs locked in mostly on Washington and Palmer. Then add in Tommi Hill’s speed and we have some options. I fully expect we’ll have several newcomers see significant snaps at WR as well. I have zero concerns about WR now.
I think the bigger problem is having someone who can accurately pass the ball to them on a consistent basis.
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,108
2,382
98
Brown only “disappeared” because our QBs locked in mostly on Washington and Palmer. Then add in Tommi Hill’s speed and we have some options. I fully expect we’ll have several newcomers see significant snaps at WR as well. I have zero concerns about WR now.
Whatever, now we are talking potential, not proven talent. I like Brown but he has a long ways to go to get into the "very talented" category.

This is the same song every year, pencil in names and label them very goodand then wonder where they went at the end of the year. Someone has got to step up in the WR group, there is no indication.anyone we currently have is 'the" guy. Talent? Hill caught hiw many passes? Can he even catch a pass and will Rhule keep him on O? Remains to be seen I guess.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,386
12,800
78
Whatever, now we are talking potential, not proven talent. I like Brown but he has a long ways to go to get into the "very talented" category.

This is the same song every year, pencil in names and label them very goodand then wonder where they went at the end of the year. Someone has got to step up in the WR group, there is no indication.anyone we currently have is 'the" guy. Talent? Hill caught hiw many passes? Can he even catch a pass and will Rhule keep him on O? Remains to be seen I guess.
College football teams rarely have 3 proven WRs on the field to start the year. IMO Washington and Brown are proven guys.
 

NUSouth

Sophomore
Oct 25, 2009
2,927
128
0
Well I think he did actually visit Lincoln previously a couple of times although obviously not since Rhule has been named the new coach. It might help if we actually had a QB coach named already.

My Take: It's a long shot. I also think there must be some serious NIL factors in play for him which complicates/muddies things but there's a slim possibility.

There are several things going on here that are a little unusual first we announce that we are keeping his uncle when I don’t think anybody could argue that we had an outstanding offensive line last year. Second we don’t have a quarterback coach And I’m wondering if that’s got something to do with Daylon targeting a quarterback coach that would be the best for him. And then he decommits from Ohio state all three events happening in the same period of time. I think he’s N
 
Sep 29, 2001
75,439
12,977
0
There are several things going on here that are a little unusual first we announce that we are keeping his uncle when I don’t think anybody could argue that we had an outstanding offensive line last year. Second we don’t have a quarterback coach And I’m wondering if that’s got something to do with Daylon targeting a quarterback coach that would be the best for him. And then he decommits from Ohio state all three events happening in the same period of time. I think he’s N
Well whatever the situation, seems like Rhule thinks he knows something good about the situation. He's teasing a lot of eyeballs out there with his cryptic tweets. I'm sure his Twitter following must be exploding if nothing else.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,386
12,800
78
There are several things going on here that are a little unusual first we announce that we are keeping his uncle when I don’t think anybody could argue that we had an outstanding offensive line last year. Second we don’t have a quarterback coach And I’m wondering if that’s got something to do with Daylon targeting a quarterback coach that would be the best for him. And then he decommits from Ohio state all three events happening in the same period of time. I think he’s N
I may be naive but I don’t think Dylan’s recruitment had much if anything to do with us keeping Donovan. As I’ve posted several times there were multiple factors outside of Donovan’s control that contributed to our O line’s issues and Rhule is sharp enough to have figured that out after watching all of our game video.
 

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,108
2,382
98
College football teams rarely have 3 proven WRs on the field to start the year. IMO Washington and Brown are proven guys.
Proven? I give you that, we know what they can and can't do. Your words were "very talented" which I do not think they qualify for.
 

phoenix4nu

All-Conference
May 10, 2009
9,774
2,088
0
I may be naive but I don’t think Dylan’s recruitment had much if anything to do with us keeping Donovan. As I’ve posted several times there were multiple factors outside of Donovan’s control that contributed to our O line’s issues and Rhule is sharp enough to have figured that out after watching all of our game video.
Maybe. But Rhule got rid of everyone else. So it's very odd that he would keep a coach whose group played probably worse than any other group - even if there were factors outside of his control.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,386
12,800
78
Maybe. But Rhule got rid of everyone else. So it's very odd that he would keep a coach whose group played probably worse than any other group - even if there were factors outside of his control.
I posted almost from the start that I wouldn’t be surprised if Raiola was retained. He has probably the best position group of recruits of all the former assistants. Rhule really didn’t have “his own guy” to bring in to coach the O line. Raiola’s resume really is fine and clearly Rhule liked him. Rhule watched all of our game video and as a former O line coach is a helluva lot better qualified to judge Raiola.
 
Last edited:

Antwill

All-Conference
Dec 18, 2004
4,450
1,085
113
I may be naive but I don’t think Dylan’s recruitment had much if anything to do with us keeping Donovan. As I’ve posted several times there were multiple factors outside of Donovan’s control that contributed to our O line’s issues and Rhule is sharp enough to have figured that out after watching all of our game video.
I'd say his Dad probably knows a thing or two about line play and could put his mind at ease about that if warranted.
 
A

anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi

Guest
Not every day you get what may be the most highly touted recruit in school history
 

Mr.Scary13

All-Conference
Dec 7, 2014
4,636
1,877
0
I may be naive but I don’t think Dylan’s recruitment had much if anything to do with us keeping Donovan. As I’ve posted several times there were multiple factors outside of Donovan’s control that contributed to our O line’s issues and Rhule is sharp enough to have figured that out after watching all of our game video.

Maybe not, but like I said a few days ago, the despair of people on here about keeping DR would turn to jubilation when his nephew ended up here....lol
 
Sep 23, 2005
18,868
3,620
0
Source that first confirmed Rhule to Nebraska is saying that Raiola is N
 

konaki

All-Conference
Oct 18, 2002
11,599
2,946
113
Do you think the #1 QB recruit in the country is afraid of competition? And regardless, if he didn't win the job his first year, he could always transfer the next year.
As I've said at least this is going to give us lots to talk about. Kids don't want to sit they want to play and when you have a kid that's pretty much guaranteed the starting job at Nebraska and a boat load of money you can almost see the end results. Again, lots to talk about and that's a good thing when your program has been dog doo doo for awhile. gbr!
 
Last edited:

itseasyas1-2-3

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2021
9,805
2,137
113
Proven? I give you that, we know what they can and can't do. Your words were "very talented" which I do not think they qualify for.
We don't know what they can and can't do. Last year Tre was the primary receiver on probably 60% or more of the pass play calls. How many times did we hear Whipple and Mickey say, "get the ball to Tre?"

Last year, NU completed 205 passes. Of that amount, Tre caught 71 or 34% of all passes caught. He likely was targeted and the pass was incomplete, the QB sacked, or the ball was dropped another 30 times or more. That would be over 100 times Tre was the primary receiver.

Tre caught more passes than the next 3 receivers combined. Washington 31, Vokolek 21, and Alante 16 for a total of 67 receptions between the 2nd, 3rd,and 4th receivers. Last year Washington averaged more per catch than Tre, 15.19 to 14.69. Vokolek averaged 12.00 and Alante 11.94.

Palmer is gone, Vokolek is gone, Oliver Martin is gone. They will no longer be targets. Unless one of the freshmen becomes a "go-to" guy, Washington and Alante stand to catch more balls in 2022. Because they are likely to become primary targets doesn't guarantee they will become a difference maker like Palmer, but it doesn't preclude either one of becoming a very talented receiver, production-wise.

Rhule's teams have historically thrown the ball more in year one, less in year 2, and even less in year 3. The pass percentages drop each succeeding year. I.E. 53%, 49%, and 47% are the actual percentages, year by year. Presumably by year 3, Rhule's offensive line has progressed to the point of being a better rushing team than the first year Rhule took over.

How many times did NU try to go deep last year other than Tre? I don't know, but percentage-wise, not much. If CT is able to return, and unless Rhule's offense is a lot different, I see no reason why CT and Washington will not be a really good combination because they were very good as a combination when they both played at Texas.

With a new staff, play caller, and system we really don't know who will step to the forefront as receivers, but, barring injuries, it's likely to be Washington and then Alante.
 
Last edited:

nick614

Junior
Oct 19, 2014
1,188
349
0
IF it was him that decided to leave OSU then it tells me there's something more to the story. Either some other school caught his eye and he wants to take some more visits again or some school is offering more NIL. The reverse would be on Ohio State screwing up their recruiting efforts. So yes, I'm curious about the root cause.

But also I'm glad it happened whatever the cause. I'm not completely surprised though as I wondered back in May if his commitment to Ohio State would last. IMO those early commitments are less likely to last these days all the way to signing day unless the kid is a home state kid. And I'm guessing there will a few big surprises on signing day for different schools.

UPDATE: It's sounding more and more to me from the reports I read that it was Raiola deciding to dump Ohio State first. Leads me to believe there is another school he's favoring although his Dad claims he's now completely open.
Ohio St does not offer any NIL upfront, and the SD QB is in the class before Raiola.