I love how you all think you’re going to goad Trumps admin into releasing the full unredacted report.
The Mueller report cover up is on!
FFS. Not everything is a conspiracy against your team.
And you will.I really would like to know more about the report than what Barr said.
And you will.
Yes. I'm sure rushing out a sensitive document is SOP.If the report is only 300 pages (IF), then Barr should have already been through the whole thing.
Yes. I'm sure rushing out a sensitive document is SOP.
They are ALL IN ON IT!LOL. We aint seein' very much of that report at all.
Why are you so sure Barr will be fair handed?They are ALL IN ON IT!
Because Mueller and his 13 angry Witch hunters would dime him out in a second. And Rosenstein. I trust the system and the institutions.Why are you so sure Barr will be fair handed?
Who from the SC has spoken about the report so far?If there were damning info in the report on collusion/obstruction, wouldn't a rep from the SC have chimed in by now?
I hope you're right but I think that Barr was hired for one reason and that's to protect Trump from this report.Because Mueller and his 13 angry Witch hunters would dime him out in a second. And Rosenstein. I trust the system and the institutions.
And I think Barr's a fair dude anyway.
I think the Barr "report" was pretty bland. It's Trumpers that turned it into treating it like a 700 ft grandslam.If there were damning info in the report on collusion/obstruction, wouldn't a rep from the SC have chimed in by now?
I would think that much or most of the part regarding obstruction would be unredacted, that would be my main interest.I think the Barr "report" was pretty bland. It's Trumpers that turned it into treating it like a 700 ft grandslam.
And I think Barr's a fair dude anyway.
It's not like that's settled case law. I'm pretty fine with the DOJ coming to that conclusion. Ultimately the American people or congress are the ones that decide. (on obstruction)Good call. You should always trust a guy who, unsolicited, offers a 19-page letter stating that the SC investigation was ill-founded and the POTUS is above the law.
Dimwit Biff is the one mischarecterizing it. The investigation was certainly justified.He didn't think the investigation was ill-founded or that POTUS was above the law. That's a mis-characterization. Just the obstruction aspect.
and they can only do that if they see the whole report or as unredacted as possible, let's hope that's the case.Ultimately the American people or congress are the ones that decide. (on obstruction)
I think we will.and they can only do that if they see the whole report or as unredacted as possible, let's hope that's the case.
I would assume that some Congresspersons will see it first and if it's too blacked out then surely they will raise holy hell about it.I think we will.
Does not the decision to release the report and how much is released to the public rest solely with the AG?I love how you all think you’re going to goad Trumps admin into releasing the full unredacted report.
Hilarious.......Redactions....Redactions.....wer'e talking about Redactions? I guess it depends on who is doing the redacting......It changes based on what party pulls the strings.I would assume that some Congresspersons will see it first and if it's too blacked out then surely they will raise holy hell about it.
I would assume that some Congresspersons will see it first and if it's too blacked out then surely they will raise holy hell about it.
Does not the decision to release the report and how much is released to the public rest solely with the AG?
Yes, well kind of. The different agencies involved in the investigation “the fruit” will likely be redacted protecting collection methods, techniques, and names. That kind of thing.Does not the decision to release the report and how much is released to the public rest solely with the AG?
The Mueller report cover up is on!
It's not like that's settled case law. I'm pretty fine with the DOJ coming to that conclusion. Ultimately the American people or congress are the ones that decide. (on obstruction)
He didn't think the investigation was ill-founded or that POTUS was above the law. That's a mis-characterization. Just the obstruction aspect.
He did state that a sitting POTUS should not be indicted. That's basically the POTUS is above the law. Regarding obstruction, he did say "asinine" and "fatally misconceived."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/19/politics/bill-barr-comey-obstruction/index.html