DowntownDawg said:
....and then he committed to OM because he was bought. Bruiser will tell you as much. And it's happening with Sanders as well, except Sanders had never committed to State.
Now, I don't know anything about what actually goes down or has gone down in that area, but I did say all along that I felt like Patterson's recruitment had that 'for sale' feel to it, and we did win out.
Of course, we've had a lot of those battles that we lost too, including some to MSU. I'm not naive enough to think my school plays the game different from anyone else. I don't know about Sanders, but I'll bet his recruitment isn't a whole lot different than Patterson's if they both are shady. Of course, personally I'd rather see us buying D-linemen than WRs if that's what is going on, but that's just me.
All that said, for the sake of enjoyment of the game, I try to ignore that side of things as much as possible.
ETA: This is typically the time of year when most of these type of rumors start coming out. It's either because it's the time when bidding really gets heavy, or it's just because people get frustrated when they are losing out on a recruit, so they start throwing out allegations. You can bet that whichever side wins the Carlos Thompson battle, the other will be throwing out allegations, no matter how unfounded. That's because a lot of our fans, including our recruiting gurus, get way too caught up in the idea that there is no way they'd lose a 50/50 recruiting battle to the other school unless something fishy went on.
Personally, I wish our fans would focus more energy on bringing down Bama, Auburn, and LSU than each other, because those are the teams holding us back, not each other.