Difference between Bush and Obama

[atlkvb]

I am simply a wise person that makes fools like you feel small to the point you obsess over me like those other fools posting before you. So join the club as a member of the whackos that are not worth having a serious conversation with.

I see, so I gather you already have your undergrad “idiot’s” degree and you’re studying for your Master’s of Imbecile?

 

[atlkvb]

so who will be next to whine? Could be many choices. LMAO

Present company included WVUBRU?

 

[WVUBRU]

We have a winner. LMAO

 

[atlkvb]

I am simply a wise person

To who or what group of inattentive unthinking sycophants?

 

[Original Mountaineer1]

Bush had many, many, many opportunities to bash Obama. He decided the President was elected and deserves the opportunity to run the country without being attacked by a former President. George H.W. Bush did the same with Clinton.

That is called class.

Obama, on the other hand, has already said he will essentially counter Trump on a daily basis. That is called lack of class.

I seem to recall during the campaign that Trump repeatedly called Obama the worst president ever, stupid, incompetent, the founder of ISIS and the most ignorant president ever.

While it is generally acceptable to criticize a sitting President, it surely isn't acceptable to personally criticize the intelligence of the sitting President or call that President the founder of a terrorist organization.

I love how the wing nuts think it acceptable for the childish Trump to behave like a school yard bully then turn around and expect others to respect him.

 

[mneilmont]

I seem to recall during the campaign that Trump repeatedly called Obama the worst president ever, stupid, incompetent, the founder of ISIS and the most ignorant president ever.

While it is generally acceptable to criticize a sitting President, it surely isn't acceptable to personally criticize the intelligence of the sitting President or call that President the founder of a terrorist organization.

I love how the wing nuts think it acceptable for the childish Trump to behave like a school yard bully then turn around and expect others to respect him.

Is it Ok if Bru plays the roll of the school yard bully in your world. In everyone else's world he is just a wise *** who thinks of himself as deserving to be the bully of the woods. Most folks correct him and send him on to bed to talk to his toys.

 

[WVPATX]

I seem to recall during the campaign that Trump repeatedly called Obama the worst president ever, stupid, incompetent, the founder of ISIS and the most ignorant president ever.

While it is generally acceptable to criticize a sitting President, it surely isn't acceptable to personally criticize the intelligence of the sitting President or call that President the founder of a terrorist organization.

I love how the wing nuts think it acceptable for the childish Trump to behave like a school yard bully then turn around and expect others to respect him.

Would you care to think back at what comments Obama made while running for President about Bush? He called Bush unpatriotic. He spent many years after his election bashing Bush and blaming Bush for almost everything. He said Bush had unconscionable ineptitude. All campaigns do this.

And my goodness, the Dems criticized, made fun of and certainly questioned the intelligence of Bush. You have no memory.

And if you get mad at Trump saying Obama created ISIS, how do you feel about Obama calling Bush unpatriotic? HMMMM.

 

[atlkvb]

Would you care to think back at what comments Obama made while running for President about Bush? He called Bush unpatriotic. He spent many years after his election bashing Bush and blaming Bush for almost everything. He said Bush had unconscionable ineptitude. All campaigns do this.

And my goodness, the Dems criticized, made fun of and certainly questioned the intelligence of Bush. You have no memory.

And if you get mad at Trump saying Obama created ISIS, how do you feel about Obama calling Bush unpatriotic? HMMMM.

WVPATX your arguments against some of the Democrat apologists who post on this forum are always on point, cogent, and effective even though a lot of them try to get around what you present from the factual or historical record.

I almost never see a direct rebuttal from any of them to anything you counter their assertions with. I do often see them either changing the subject, switching topics or comparing what you point out to other things they claim are as bad or worse by Republicans. Finally, a lot of them are reduced to name calling once you dismantle their attempts to revise or distort what you've established against them or the Left.

You did it here like you always do, and your consistency with it is satisfying.

 

[dave]

I am simply a wise person that makes fools like you feel small to the point you obsess over me like those other fools posting before you. So join the club as a member of the whackos that are not worth having a serious conversation with.

Hahahahahahahahaha. Aka a fat *** blowhard who never knows when to stfu.

 

[atlkvb]

Finally, a lot of them are reduced to name calling

Hahahahahahahahaha. Aka a fat *** blowhard who never knows when to stfu.

See what I mean?

 

[mneilmont]

Hahahahahahahahaha. Aka a fat *** blowhard who never knows when to stfu.

Damned good depiction.