You could argue that shooting with 5 seconds gave the opportunity for an offensive rebound and put back, where if you shot with less time, less of a chance
You could argue that shooting with 5 seconds gave the opportunity for an offensive rebound and put back, where if you shot with less time, less of a chance
Imhomeh. Your home. It’s a tie game. You hold for the last shot. Worst possibility is OT. Very poor decision.
You can think it’s ridiculous but you’re also missing the point I was trying to make to BAC.
The discussion between me and BAC was about the shot itself (which he called 1 in 10,000).
Everything you stated there has nothing to do with the shot itself, which was only made possible because the Maryland kid shot a three with 5 seconds left in a tie game, which made it a poor shot imo.
Original point was that the Maryland kid should have taken a better shot with less time left on the clock.
Upon closer review of the original 1/10,000 post - I don’t think he was saying that shot itself is made that infrequently.
Rather, I believe he was saying that the odds of the game outcome going down that way in Michigan State’s favor in regulation following Maryland’s shot attempt was 1/10,000. To pull it off, only a shot like that could’ve been attempted as there wasn’t enough time for Michigan State to run the floor for a closer look. But for that to happen, first Maryland’s shot had to miss - it had to be a rebound on the long side fielded cleanly by Michigan State in such a way where forward progress could immediately begin without time coming off the clock. And then he had to actually get the shot off.
It’s still probably more like 1 in a thousand not ten thousand but it’s very low odds. In any case, I still don’t see why you give them a chance to rebound. Hold for the last shot when your the home team IMO.
Its miracle from 55 feet. How many shots beyond half court have you seen..was Harper shot over Purdue a miracle. Let's not act it was within half court
I hear what you’re saying..but I interpreted BACs point differently and it being more about a half court shot being such a rare occurrence.
Look at that post before that one. The one you posted is just defending that the shot doesn’t go in that often. A Hail Mary miracle and 1 / 10,000 are not the same thing. Hail Mary’s are successful way more than once in every 10,000 tries. But in this case - several other things had to go exactly right too to get an opportunity for that shot. The prior post discusses the fact that MD had an open look with only 2.9 seconds in regulation.
Lol it was a miracle. Even izzo said so.Maryland player got lazy and pulled up too early for an unnecessary deep 3.
I wouldn’t call it a miracle shot. 2.9 seconds is a ton of time to make a pass, get the ball to half court and have an open look at the basket….which is exactly what they did. As the Mich State player stated - they practiced that play.
Maybe it was a lucky shot as Izzo called it post game…but not a miracle shot.
Miracle shot would be chucking it one handed from the opposite foul line and winning it.
Thanks for bringing me back in..
because i have no interest in debating minute opinions about whether it was 1 in 100 or 2000 or 10000. Its not a big deal in my posting for today
You look like obsessed in making this thread 2 pages...die on this hill like anyone gives a ****
It was a miracle ending to the last 5 seconds
And no the shot isn't 1-20 on the run receiving the ball with 1.9 sec and shooting it with .9 from 55 feet away whoever is promoting that idea
Lol it was a miracle. Even izzo said so.
Showed it on ABC news tonight as well as a high school game, where game winner was almost as far
And bricked it right back to an MSU player.It was a very low percentage shot that won it for the Spartans but I still say Gillespie shot too soon.