Laughable.......sure you will....."Kum ba yah":joy: :joy: :joy:
I won't change on January 20.
Laughable.......sure you will....."Kum ba yah":joy: :joy: :joy:
I won't change on January 20.
no different than Republican Presidents and their pork filled bills.I can't wait for you to attack the Biden Admin and the House when their spending bill which will loaded with Pork...Where was your commentary when Biden said yesterday that a Dim victory in GA will assure everyone a $2,000 check...crickets...just more Orange Man Bad as usual.
You are one of the few on here that is honest.If you make a call to the police about someone standing outside your home shouting at you, are you going to be asked if that person is armed? A group of people shouting at you outside your home is intimidating in and of itself. Adding guns to the mix makes it more or less intimidating?
Honestly, how about both sides quit showing up at folks' private residences and acting like jerks. If you want to protest Hawley, protest him at one of his offices. Same goes for the folks who protested the Michigan SoS.
I'm not going to defend Antifa. Their actions are indefensible. I'm not going to defend others who cross a line, whether I agree with their stance on the issue or not.
born is madLaughable.......sure you will....."Kum ba yah"
Great. I absolutely will. Why didn't you attack Trump for wanting to giver everyone a $2,000 check? Just more Orange God swallowing from you.I can't wait for you to attack the Biden Admin and the House when their spending bill which will loaded with Pork...Where was your commentary when Biden said yesterday that a Dim victory in GA will assure everyone a $2,000 check...crickets...just more Orange Man Bad as usual.
no different than Republican Presidents and their pork filled bills.
Agreed. Not sure why it's difficult. Both sets of losers are wrong. No need to defend one's tribe and point to a time the other team f'd up in a similar fashion. Hopeful a few very public prosecutions and long prison sentences from agitators from each side would cool this off.If you make a call to the police about someone standing outside your home shouting at you, are you going to be asked if that person is armed? A group of people shouting at you outside your home is intimidating in and of itself. Adding guns to the mix makes it more or less intimidating?
Honestly, how about both sides quit showing up at folks' private residences and acting like jerks. If you want to protest Hawley, protest him at one of his offices. Same goes for the folks who protested the Michigan SoS.
I'm not going to defend Antifa. Their actions are indefensible. I'm not going to defend others who cross a line, whether I agree with their stance on the issue or not.
Because you've only been around during Trump's one term. I wasn't a fan of Ma0bama's spending and stupid protectionist trade policies either.Agreed, but he only attacks Republicans for some reason...
This is why you aren't a lost cause. You see the symptoms, I just haven't been able to get you to elaborate far enough what you see as the cause of the problem.I assure you I will still hate tariffs, wasteful spending, etc. Sorry
Great. I absolutely will. Why didn't you attack Trump for wanting to giver everyone a $2,000 check? Just more Orange God swallowing from you.
I just don't think I agree there are as many problems as people like to suggest. Aside from 2020, we are in a period of unprecedented wealth, growth, opportunity, relative peace. Not to say everything is perfect and will forever stay that way.This is why you aren't a lost cause. You see the symptoms, I just haven't been able to get you to elaborate far enough what you see as the cause of the problem.
Because you've only been around during Trump's one term. I wasn't a fan of Ma0bama's spending and stupid protectionist trade policies either.
Trump has been handing money out to states like candy for 4 years. Hysterical you seem to be piping up about it now.One thing that is going to happen as soon as Biden takes office...he will handing out money to the states like it was candy...NYC, Portland and Chicago will have FU money in about 3 months. All the allowed "peaceful protects" will build a new downtown in those cities.
I attacked Trump for cutting subsidies to the USPS for Chinese shipments? WTF does that even mean?Agreed..but even when Trump cut subsidies to the USPS for Chinese shipments to the US you were attacking him...you can hate the man, but he did some things that have cut costs...and you have never acknowledged it. And I'm not a Trump fan...but I like many of his policies.
Do you have kids? I don't yet but I am planning to start soon and I want them to be able to live their life free and not be born into debt (the current generation isn't going to pay it back so who is?). I want them to not live in a country that can send its goons to kidnap you and throw you in a cage for growing a plant or not reporting their earnings to be stolen. I don't want their every move to be recorded and stored in a government database. I don't want my kids to require permission from the government to live their lives.I just don't think I agree there are as many problems as people like to suggest. Aside from 2020, we are in a period of unprecedented wealth, growth, opportunity, relative peace. Not to say everything is perfect and will forever stay that way.
What exactly is the "problem" as you see it?
It was not the same......I must have missed the part where the Michigan protestors were pounding on the SOS's door.I wouldnt classify that the same as actual violence and property damage. As ugly as it is, shouting obscenities and "threats" can be construed as free speech although I admit that depending on what the threats are and local obscenty laws would apply to the legality of the shouting.
Yes.....local DC station played a video made by the protestors.is there any evidence to what Hawley said? just asking.
the debt isn't going away....just wait until China calls for the marker to be paid back.Do you have kids? I don't yet but I am planning to start soon and I want them to be able to live their life free and not be born into debt. I want them to not live in a country that can send its goons to kidnap you and throw you in a cage for growing a plant or not reporting their earnings to be stolen. I don't want their every move to be recorded and stored in a government database. I don't want my kids to require permission from the government to live their lives.
The problem as I see it is government. It is inherently corrupt and it is the concentration of power and influence in this world.
The solution is decentralization.
do you have any problem with the country going further into debt essentially stealing from future generations to live more comfortably today? What do you think should be done about it?the debt isn't going away....just wait until China calls for the marker to be paid back.
I agree with you on government being the problem. Guess I just don't understand all of you elaborate conspiracies about WEF, new world orders, establishment, etc.Do you have kids? I don't yet but I am planning to start soon and I want them to be able to live their life free and not be born into debt (the current generation isn't going to pay it back so who is?). I want them to not live in a country that can send its goons to kidnap you and throw you in a cage for growing a plant or not reporting their earnings to be stolen. I don't want their every move to be recorded and stored in a government database. I don't want my kids to require permission from the government to live their lives.
The problem as I see it is government. It is inherently corrupt and it is the concentration of power and influence in this world.
The solution is decentralization.
Would be suicide for them. Won't happen. And China doesn't hold as much of our debt as you think.If everyone is worried about China....please tell me why in the **** we can't grow potatos. Look at what we import from them.
Trump has been handing money out to states like candy for 4 years. Hysterical you seem to be piping up about it now.
Honestly didn't really follow the rest of your post.
Yes. I do. Regardless of the President in charge. Especially during boom cycles.do you have any problem with the country going further into debt essentially stealing from future generations to live more comfortably today? What do you think should be done about it?
Ah semantics. Not up for anything serious, just defend the Great Orange God. Enjoy your day!Really? Trump wrote the checks? Congress has nothing to do with it? It was Trump 100%? Trump, not of fan of him doing this, but he just did what every politician in the last 30 years have done....give money and hope they vote you back into office...There is a reason why election years are the most pork filled budgets...and the off years is figuring out where the spend will generate the most votes.
sure i do....I'm a blue dog Dem. But the GOP answer is SS and Medicare cuts.do you have any problem with the country going further into debt essentially stealing from future generations to live more comfortably today? What do you think should be done about it?
Hard to watch that video and call them Antifa. Pathetic douch bags? Absolutely. And they shouldn't have been there. PYes.....local DC station played a video made by the protestors.
debt will not be handled until we scrap this outdated tax system.do you have any problem with the country going further into debt essentially stealing from future generations to live more comfortably today? What do you think should be done about it?
Ah semantics. Not up for anything serious, just defend the Great Orange God. Enjoy your day!
Both parties spend like drunken sailors.......Who spends the money? Congress of the Executive branch? They threatened to sue Trump for trying to give 2k directly to the people...and he backed down...(and yes, I disagree with the 2k and even the $600 payments)
Calling out parties that need to sign off on a budget is not protecting Trump...it is actually stating what actually happens every year!
Both parties spend like drunken sailors.......
As i said earlier, I'm a blue dog dem. We need to handle the debt but our archaic tax system has to go. I for one support the Fair Tax.100% agree...and yes the Republican Party used to pretend to act like they cared about the budget, but those days are long gone. The dims have always said tax more people so we can spend more...and this will be in full display in less than 20 days. Coop and the rest will sit on their hands and use some socialist leaning economist to try and prove that more taxes will make citizens happier and more wealthy.
Interesting. And replace it with what?debt will not be handled until we scrap this outdated tax system.
Earlier today you said I didn't say anything about Obama's spending. I did and mention Trump's spending and now it is suddenly Congress's fault. :joy: :joy: :joy:Who spends the money? Congress of the Executive branch? They threatened to sue Trump for trying to give 2k directly to the people...and he backed down...(and yes, I disagree with the 2k and even the $600 payments)
Calling out parties that need to sign off on a budget is not protecting Trump...it is actually stating what actually happens every year!
Agreed, but he only attacks Republicans for some reason...
Earlier today you said I didn't say anything about Obama's spending. I did and mention Trump's spending and now it is suddenly Congress's fault. :joy: :joy: :joy:
Why would I even bother with such an oblivious Trump swallower. I look forward to you joining the Free Trade, anti spending resistance around midday January 21.
He's a far left liberal
And I believe ones home and its locked doors constitute private property. Those entering the property without invitation and attempting to breach the barriers to the property are trespassing. In addition, ppusing force to gain entry, such as banging on closed doors, constitutes a threat to personal safety on private property and, in my opinion, should justify any sort of defensive measure, including the employment of severe actions. In fact, when there are threats of harm to the rightful owner(s) of the private property, I believe that defense from potentially serious (especially life ending) attacks should be rebuffed without mercy toward the intruders. Such outward attacks by lawless thugs must be stopped. Invasion of ones privacy, including the residence and real property surrounding such, as far more than a simple, lawful demonstration on public land.Also note that "being armed" for a protest doesnt make it violent or even threatening. It could be intimidating if you are intimidated by guns but being armed in public is not illegal in Michigan and most other states.
You are one of the few on here that is honest.
One MIGHT have a right to stand on public property, in front of my ( or the home of anyone), and shout at them. Doing so and lacing the rhetoric with obscenities, especially when children are being, unwittingly exposed to such, is crude and exposes lack of character and good taste on the part of the perpetrator. However such a tasteless display may not have crossed into illegslities. However, the moment there are THREATS of hostility to the objects of the activity then, as I understand the first amendment, this is no longer a free speech issue. Threats carry with them the immediate belief that harm, including desth, is on the minds of those bellowing at them. Encroaching onto their private property with physical attempts such as the pounding on doors, breaking of windows , starting fires, etc.,to gain access and contact with the occupants constitutes a true ‘clear snd present danger. No one has the right to attempt a forced entry into the home of another, especially if harmful threats are accompany the attempted entry. Thr lawful rights of the law abiding MUST be restored. The rule by anarchy MUST stop.If you make a call to the police about someone standing outside your home shouting at you, are you going to be asked if that person is armed? A group of people shouting at you outside your home is intimidating in and of itself. Adding guns to the mix makes it more or less intimidating?
Honestly, how about both sides quit showing up at folks' private residences and acting like jerks. If you want to protest Hawley, protest him at one of his offices. Same goes for the folks who protested the Michigan SoS.
I'm not going to defend Antifa. Their actions are indefensible. I'm not going to defend others who cross a line, whether I agree with their stance on the issue or not.
exactly......no matter what group you are with, Left/Right or in between.One MIGHT have a right to stand on public property, in front of my ( or the home of anyone), and shout at them. Doing so and lacing the rhetoric with obscenities, especially when children are being, unwittingly exposed to such, is crude and exposes lack of character and good taste on the part of the perpetrator. However such a tasteless display may not have crossed into illegslities. However, the moment there are THREATS of hostility to the objects of the activity then, as I understand the first amendment, this is no longer a free speech issue. Threats carry with them the immediate belief that harm, including desth, is on the minds of those bellowing at them. Encroaching onto their private property with physical attempts such as the pounding on doors, breaking of windows , starting fires, etc.,to gain access and contact with the occupants constitutes a true ‘clear snd present danger. No one has the right to attempt a forced entry into the home of another, especially if harmful threats are accompany the attempted entry. Thr lawful rights of the law abiding MUST be restored. The rule by anarchy MUST stop.
In the case of elected officials I brlieve we are reaching the point where each should be given a hand gun of their choice ( maybe paid for by the particular political party of that individual) and provided, without personal cost, all necessary training as to safe and appropriate use thereof. I would not object to this being extended to their spouses. No one should face life threatening actions by others without the benefit of having access to appropriate means of self defense.