| Bridgeport | 73 | Eligible** |
| David City | 73 | Ineligible |
| Johnson County Central | 70 | Ineligible |
| Wakefield | 61 | Ineligible |
| Summerland | 61 | Eligible** |
| Freeman | 59 | Eligible** |
| Madison | 58 | Eligible** |
| Pender | 57 | Eligible** |
| Twin River | 56 | Ineligible |
| Omaha Christian Academy (Om. Street) | 55 | Eligible** |
| TCNE (Allen & E-H) | 55 | Eligible** |
| Stanton | 54 | Eligible** |
| Elkhorn Valley | 52 | Eligible** |
| Tri County | 52 | Ineligible |
| Alma | 50 | Ineligible |
| Perkins County | 50 | Eligible** |
| West Holt | 49 | Ineligible |
| Shelby-Rising City | 49 | Eligible** |
| Crofton | 48 | Eligible** |
| Hemingford | 48 | Eligible** |
| Kimball | 48 | Eligible** |
| LCC | 48 | Eligible** |
| Plainview | 48 | Eligible** |
| Wisner-Pilger | 48 | Eligible** |
| Exter-Milligan & Friend | 47 | |
| Heartland | 47 | |
| Arcadia/Loup City | 46 | |
| Morrill | 46 | |
| Homer | 46 | |
| Sutton | 46 | |
| Thayer Central | 46 | |
| Centennial | 46 | |
| Elwood & Eustis-Farnam | 45 | |
| GACC | 45 | |
| Wausa & Osmond | 45 | |
| LHNE | 44 | |
| Sandy Creek | 44 | |
| Clarkson/Leigh | 43 | |
| Mead | 43 | |
| H/LHF | 42 | |
| St. Ed & Newman Grove | 42 | |
| East Butler | 41 | |
| Hartington-Newcastle | 41 | |
| Lourdes CC | 41 | |
| Southern Valley | 41 | |
| McCool Junction | 41 | |
| Niobrara & Verdigre | 41 | |
| South Loup | 41 | |
| Boyd County | 40 | |
| Dundy County | 40 | |
| Pleasanton | 40 | |
| Ravenna | 40 | |
| Southern | 40 | |
| Sutherland | 40 | |
| Johnson-Brock | 40 | |
| Arapahoe | 39 | |
| Bloomfield | 39 | |
| North Platte St. Pat's | 39 | |
| Maywood & Hayes Center | 38 | |
| Stapleton & McPherson County | 37 | 38.66666667 |
| Howells-Dodge | 37 | 36.33333333 |
| Cambridge | 37 | 35.66666667 |
| Franklin | 37 | 35 |
| B-D & Shickley | 37 | 34.66666667 |
| Central Valley | 37 | 33.66666667 |
| Creighton | 37 | 27.66666667 |
| Ainsworth | 36 | |
| Elmwood-Murdock | 36 | |
| Walthill | 36 | |
| Hitchcock County | 36 | |
| Palmer | 36 | |
| Keya Paha & Rock County | 36 | |
| Wilcox-Hildreth | 35 | |
| Bertrand | 34 | |
| Elm Creek | 34 | |
| HTRS | 34 | |
| Nebraska Christian | 34 | |
| Riverside & Spalding Academy | 34 | |
| Weeping Water | 34 | |
| Burwell | 33 | |
| FCSH | 33 | |
| Osceola | 32 | |
| Overton | 32 | |
| Blue Hill | 31 | |
| Chambers/Wheeler Central | 31 | |
| Loomis | 31 | |
| Deshler | 31 | |
| LDNE | 31 | |
| Cedar Bluffs | 31 | |
| Axtell | 30 | |
| Bancroft-Rosalie | 30 | |
| Lawrence-Nelson | 30 | |
| Twin Loup (Sargent & Loup County) | 30 | |
| Bayard | 29 | |
| Neligh-Oakdale | 29 | |
| Randolph | 29 | |
| Winside | 29 | |
| High Plains | 28 | |
| Brady | 28 | |
| Anselmo-Merna | 27 | |
| Kenesaw | 27 | |
| Maxwell | 26 | |
| Fullerton | 26 | |
| Humphrey St. Francis | 25 | |
| Sandhills & Thedford | 25 | |
| Wynot | 25 | |
| Elgin & Pope John | 25 | |
| Giltner | 24 | |
| St. Mary's | 22 | |
| Hyannis | 21 | |
| Nebraska Lutheran | 18 | |
| Mullen | 16 |
I don't think Superior would be ineligible if they played 8-man. Their mid-cycle number this year was 47, which means they were eligible. I *think* that makes them eligible again for another 2 year cycle, based on the terminology below. That would bump Sandhills Valley down to D2, wouldn't it?Here's where I have the D1-D2 split:
(***Caveat..........Superior has not declared, but have heard they are going 11 man; even if they go 8 man, they don't affect the line as an ineligible team in 8 man)
(***Caveat 2........Red Cloud & Wauneta-Palisade are not declared, but have good knowledge they both will play 6 man)
(***Caveat 3.........College View Academy is not declared and does not have an enrollment turned in...........but I dont' think they play football)
D1 (53 ELIGIBLE & 7 INELIGIBLE = 60 TOTAL):
Bridgeport 73 Eligible** David City 73 Ineligible Johnson County Central 70 Ineligible Wakefield 61 Ineligible Summerland 61 Eligible** Freeman 59 Eligible** Madison 58 Eligible** Pender 57 Eligible** Twin River 56 Ineligible Omaha Christian Academy (Om. Street) 55 Eligible** TCNE (Allen & E-H) 55 Eligible** Stanton 54 Eligible** Elkhorn Valley 52 Eligible** Tri County 52 Ineligible Alma 50 Ineligible Perkins County 50 Eligible** West Holt 49 Ineligible Shelby-Rising City 49 Eligible** Crofton 48 Eligible** Hemingford 48 Eligible** Kimball 48 Eligible** LCC 48 Eligible** Plainview 48 Eligible** Wisner-Pilger 48 Eligible** Exter-Milligan & Friend 47 Heartland 47 Arcadia/Loup City 46 Morrill 46 Homer 46 Sutton 46 Thayer Central 46 Centennial 46 Elwood & Eustis-Farnam 45 GACC 45 Wausa & Osmond 45 LHNE 44 Sandy Creek 44 Clarkson/Leigh 43 Mead 43 H/LHF 42 St. Ed & Newman Grove 42 East Butler 41 Hartington-Newcastle 41 Lourdes CC 41 Southern Valley 41 McCool Junction 41 Niobrara & Verdigre 41 South Loup 41 Boyd County 40 Dundy County 40 Pleasanton 40 Ravenna 40 Southern 40 Sutherland 40 Johnson-Brock 40 Arapahoe 39 Bloomfield 39 North Platte St. Pat's 39 Maywood & Hayes Center 38 Stapleton & McPherson County 37 38.66666667
D2 (52 TOTAL):
Howells-Dodge 37 36.33333333 Cambridge 37 35.66666667 Franklin 37 35 B-D & Shickley 37 34.66666667 Central Valley 37 33.66666667 Creighton 37 27.66666667 Ainsworth 36 Elmwood-Murdock 36 Walthill 36 Hitchcock County 36 Palmer 36 Keya Paha & Rock County 36 Wilcox-Hildreth 35 Bertrand 34 Elm Creek 34 HTRS 34 Nebraska Christian 34 Riverside & Spalding Academy 34 Weeping Water 34 Burwell 33 FCSH 33 Osceola 32 Overton 32 Blue Hill 31 Chambers/Wheeler Central 31 Loomis 31 Deshler 31 LDNE 31 Cedar Bluffs 31 Axtell 30 Bancroft-Rosalie 30 Lawrence-Nelson 30 Twin Loup (Sargent & Loup County) 30 Bayard 29 Neligh-Oakdale 29 Randolph 29 Winside 29 High Plains 28 Brady 28 Anselmo-Merna 27 Kenesaw 27 Maxwell 26 Fullerton 26 Humphrey St. Francis 25 Sandhills & Thedford 25 Wynot 25 Elgin & Pope John 25 Giltner 24 St. Mary's 22 Hyannis 21 Nebraska Lutheran 18 Mullen 16
Couldn't agree more. Proves a broken system once again...Teams like Alma took the 1 year exemption because their boy count was 1 over 47 last cycle. Now this coming cycle are Ineligible with count of 50 but Bridgeport gets to be eligible for playoffs this cycle with 73!!! Woof! Crazy to me Bridgeport went from 39 to 73 in two years...Nearly doubled their boy count in a two year window...I understand the two year exemption....but Bridgeport being eligible for 8 man with their number at 73 is comedy. That number puts them above the C1 champion Boone Central....and yes I understand NG isn't with Boone going forward and that is why their number is where it is, but still just hilarious to compare.
Was there a school that closed near Bridgeport or a new industrial business bring in some new families?Couldn't agree more. Proves a broken system once again...Teams like Alma took the 1 year exemption because their boy count was 1 over 47 last cycle. Now this coming cycle are Ineligible with count of 50 but Bridgeport gets to be eligible for playoffs this cycle with 73!!! Woof! Crazy to me Bridgeport went from 39 to 73 in two years...Nearly doubled their boy count in a two year window...
Believe they are getting some kids from Leyton and Bayard.Was there a school that closed near Bridgeport or a new industrial business bring in some new families?
Maybe? But 34 Boys?Believe they are getting some kids from Leyton and Bayard.
Superior would be ineligible, you have to be under the #47 for enrollment the first year of the cycle.I don't think Superior would be ineligible if they played 8-man. Their mid-cycle number this year was 47, which means they were eligible. I *think* that makes them eligible again for another 2 year cycle, based on the terminology below. That would bump Sandhills Valley down to D2, wouldn't it?
Taken from page 29 of Football manual, linked here
h. If during the immediate preceding classification period a school’s BOY three-gradeenrollment submitted to the Nebraska Department of Education was 47 or lessand if that school has been playing 8-man football, such school may remaineligible for 8-man football for one more classification period, even though its newthree-grade enrollment exceeds 47.
Thanks for clarifying this. Do you know where the language is that says it has to be year one? The only language I could find was this letter H piece that says "during the preceding". I assumed that mid-cycle numbers would fall into that terminology as "during" the prior classification period.Superior would be ineligible, you have to be under the #47 for enrollment the first year of the cycle.
Not sure where it says it, I had to ask that same question to the NSAA when we were determining to go 8 or 11 man in this cycle.Thanks for clarifying this. Do you know where the language is that says it has to be year one? The only language I could find was this letter H piece that says "during the preceding". I assumed that mid-cycle numbers would fall into that terminology as "during" the prior classification period.
I’m sure this gets asked every new cycle but what determines if you get the “grace period” or not? How is someone like pender eligible but twin river is not? Or Alma ineligible but plainview is eligible?
Giltner had a meeting Tuesday night about their proposal. Redo/add onto the existing school also put in a track and new football field. 21.7 million bond issue. I have seen the tax numbers and offta to be a land owner in the area.What was DT's proposal?
Thanks for clarifying this. Do you know where the language is that says it has to be year one? The only language I could find was this letter H piece that says "during the preceding". I assumed that mid-cycle numbers would fall into that terminology as "during" the prior classification period
someone paid for the current school many years ago and someone must pay for the next school eventuallyGiltner had a meeting Tuesday night about their proposal. Redo/add onto the existing school also put in a track and new football field. 21.7 million bond issue. I have seen the tax numbers and offta to be a land owner in the area.
how is Bridgeport eligible for playoffs, can someone explain this to me? If they are eligible with that number then this system needs to be changed that is a total joke.
Their enrollment was 39 last cycle so this explains howYou must play at least one two year cycle at or below the maximum cutoff (47) to be eligible for playoffs. The following two year cycle if you are over that number of (47) you are given the “grace period”. If you are over the enrollment the following two year cycle you would be ineligible, but could become eligible if your enrollment is less than the (47) year 2 of the cycle. Year one of the two year cycle you will be ineligible, year two you become eligible. This is what happened to Superior this last cycle.
Is there a chance the Bridgeport number is wrong? One reason those numbers only go out to ADs is that there are often a couple of errors that need to be corrected.
According to the numbers that were sent out, the boy # was 73 and girl # was 61. The last 2 year cycle number that were taken, the boy # was 39 and the girl # was 60. So it appears there was just a couple classes stacked together that there was a dramatic dip in boy # and now it seems to be swinging the other way. 2 cycles ago, the Bridgeport boy # was 60. It's a very odd anomaly, but not totally crazy to think that this is actually a normal bump of about 5-6 boys in a couple classes from the normal enrollment number.Possibly, but if you go to the NDE and the Nebraska Education Profile for different schools, you can see full enrollment numbers.
In 2021-22, their 9th-11th grade had 99 kids. So theoretically 49.5 boys. Wouldn't take much of a gender imbalance at all to get them under 47.
Last year's 8th-10th (this year's 9th-11th) had 126. Theoretically, 63 boys. And it wouldn't take a huge gender imbalance to get to 73. Plus, it looks like their high school has grown by 20 kids the last several years. So last year's 248 in the building may very well be 268 or higher.
Maybe you or someone else knows...Bridgeport did see an influx of kids K-12 from Leyton and some from Bayard. Leyton dismissed their Sup. a couple of years ago and it caused a division within both communities (Dalton and Gurley), so some families sent their kids to Bridgeport. Leyton has declared six-man (as they should based on their enrollment) and a few families have said their kid will not be playing six-man and will choice to Bridgeport. I think they get some kids from the Bayard district as well.
GurLEY DalTONMaybe you or someone else knows...
How did Dalton and Gurley come up with the name Leyton for their schools?
Google found me nothing.
Thank you! That makes senseGurLEY DalTON
They were C2 last year in hoops. They were C1 in boys hoops in the 2021-2022 season.Wasn't this similar to Clarkson-Leigh a couple of years ago when they won D1? IIRC they were actually C1 in Boys Hoops. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Huskerland Preps
Shining the Spotlight on Key Opening District Games
Huskerland Preps
Huskerland Bob's Crystal Ball: Week 5
Huskerland Preps
Throwback Thursday: Huskerland Football Stat Leaders, 1992, 1996, 2006
Huskerland Preps
A Reminder: 2026 Huskerland Top 225 Seniors, The 1s
Huskerland Preps
Huskerland Center of Attention: Braxton Eggerling, Creighton