The rich get richer...except for David West. This upcoming season, he will sign for the vet min of 1.4mil after opting out of making 12.6mil.
But hey, he will be a hell of a 20mpg bench player.
Am I the only one that thinks the NBA needs to legislate a way around this type of thing?
That's playing at a nearly 90% discount next season. If his value is really around $12.6M, should the Spurs be allowed to have him for only $1.4M, and doesn't that create some inequity in the market?
I'm good with allowing players to sign for less than market value, but I would be for setting a limit on how far below market you can go. If you have an offer on the table for $10M per year, you shouldn't be able to sign elsewhere for less than around $7M or so.
I know their contract regulations are already pretty convoluted, but the Spurs already got Green at a deep discount. Duncan is supposedly going to take a hefty discount too. That's not shrewd management that's helping them build a great team. That's just players being willing to work for significantly less and thus essentially giving them a team with a value of well over $100M, but only requiring them to pay $80M.