Perspectives on the Pandemic Episode 2: In this explosive second edition of Perspectives on the Pandemic, Professor Knut Wittkowski, for twenty years head of The Rockefeller University's Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design, says that social distancing and lockdown is the absolutely worst way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus. Further, he offers data to show that China and South Korea had already reached their peak number of cases when they instituted their containment measures. In other words, nature had already achieved, or nearly achieved, herd immunity.
He claims it takes 80% to receive herd immunity, SARS and MERS didn’t get anywhere close to that, yet they went away.
Why is this “expert” right and the others are wrong? Where is his model showing the timeline it takes to get to 80%? What would be the death toll?
Your position is we’re better off to let people die than do anything to try to slow the spread? When has that theory ever been allowed to happen or tested?
Early he says if we do nothing, it comes for two weeks, peaks for two weeks then is gone. Like really? We can just get 300 million people infected in a month and be done?
He moves on to say he believes China’s numbers are valid, it’s very hard to keep that information secret.
Then he says that we would peak at 25,000 infections per day for weeks, with 10% requiring hospitalization. He even says 2% of all symptomatic cases will die.
So if we need approximately 300 million cases for herd immunity, and 1/3 of those were symptomatic and then 2% of those die, we get, 2 million deaths by his “logic”.
So we need 80% for herd immunity, but a few weeks totaling 350k infections and we’ll magically be over?
I thought academics and models were the problem? But this one guy has it right?