Nick Richards was cleared just a few weeks before. Not even in the same realm.
And he disnt even go to 4 different highschools, with numerous academic questions.
Please someone remind us what Capel was fired for at OU...?
Um, ok. You can assume all you want. You made my point about Thomas. I have no clue where he got the money but I'm not just going to assume it came from Coach K or the staff like you are doing. You're just assuming but it could've came from anywhere. You're doing exactly what other fans do and say about us. They hear that AD got money, so....."Oh, Cal and UK cheat cause I heard Davis got money". Whatever. If you want to play that game, so ahead but Im not buying that at all. Nothing is fact, just a bunch a hearsay ********. They very well may be dirty. The point is that you, nor I, don't have a clue if they are or are not. You can believe that if you want, that's your right but don't talk like it's a fact cause you don't know. Like I said in my earlier post, a player taking more doesn't make the school or the staff dirty. If you believe otherwise then you'd have to say that Cal is dirty too cause a few of his players have been caught doing some things.
About Carter, if you believe everything a kid says in an interview, you've got some issues to work out. How many kids do you ever hear actually say that they have a leader? Not many, although most probably do. So, you can choose to believe that also but that pretty naive. I never said that Cal didn't recruit Carter at all. I just said that we were never really an option for Carter and from what I've heard, that is true. He was always considered to be a heavy Duke lean.
If you know Coach K is dirty, do us all a favor and call the NCAA. Otherwise, it's all hearsay and assumptions.
Did I say anything about Nick Richards?
Thomas put down 30K on some jewelry then wouldn't talk to the NCAA about it.
If the money was clean, shouldn't have been much trouble to clear it up. But since it's Duke, he doesn't have to say a thing and there's no trouble.
I doubt K or the staff gave him the money. But I have little doubt that he should have been ineligible due to the source of the money.
Point is it took a recruit of his caliber months to clear.
Bagley, consensus #1 with academic questions, was cleared in days.
Duke and Kentucky have been swimming in mostly the same waters recruiting wise but there's been a few players they've gone after that we've stayed away from.
Cal was on Parker very early in the process and then backed way off.
Never messed with Duvall and gave Bagley only token attention for some reason.
I find those recruitments much more interesting now
Token attention was given to Bagley? UK offered him a scholarship to play basketball...that is not simply token attention my friend. I cannot speak to Duval but I'm pretty sure Cal backed off of Parker because he knew he wasn't getting him in the end, not because anything shady was going on with him.
Cal knew Bagley would never be eligible at UK skipping his senior year.
By the way- what do we have to do to get all you bandwagon Duke geeks out of here? Every day I have to put another five of you on ignore. Go home.
Point is that......... you missed my point.
No. You just dont understand what youre talking about. You made a poor attempt at a point. I refuted it. Now you say i just dont understand, because i dont see it your way.
No. Youre just wrong.
Bagley was given preferential treatment as evidenced by his ultra expedited clearance. Thats a fact. The only issue is the illegal exchange of money or something else in return for that result.
I agree 100% with you. I never said the money he had was clean. I just said that there are many avenues for players to get money. Just cause he got money doesn't make Coach K and his staff dirty. They very well could be as dirty as a $2 *****, I have no idea. My point was just that a player taking money doesn't automatically make the school or the staff dirty. That's all I was saying.
LMAO! Ok, whatever. I'll say it one more time since you keep saying everything is fact. You have no idea what is fact, it's just your opinion. It's fine that you have that opinion, you're completely entitled to your opinion. But it's just that, an opinion. You may be 100% correct but we just don't know that for a fact. Also, that would make the NCAA dirty and Duke just lucky. Do I believe Duke gets beneficial treatment from the NCAA? Probably but I can't prove it and it's just my opinion. But I'm not claiming that it's fact or that I know I'm right cause I can't prove anything. If I could, I'd be the 1st in line to turn Ratface in. That my point. That's all. I just refuse to act like other fan bases that cry and whine about us.
And that would be just fine if it was a NCAA issue, but this is a FBI investigation last I checked. If there is some bad juju there I am sure the FBI will find it. Personally, I won't be happy, but if Duke is in the wrong they should be punished.lol @ the NCAA ever punishing Duke and Coach God Shitshefski
Only thing I disagree with is your first sentence . Honestly , nothing would surprise me .It will surprise me if top level programs like Duke, Kentucky, Kansas are involved. Calipari and Krzyzewski don't have to pay players or break rules. They get great players because the great players are lined up to play at Kentucky, Duke. Pitino was in a position of being 2nd best. He was being beaten consistently by Calipari, and his ego couldn't stand it. Person cheated because he works for Bruce Pearl, who is a cheater. USC has always been a cheater program. More schools will be outed, but they will most likely be schools that had to cheat to keep up.
I said posts ago that my conclusion that ncaa was part of this conspiracy was not fact.
I agree 100% with you. I never said the money he had was clean. I just said that there are many avenues for players to get money. Just cause he got money doesn't make Coach K and his staff dirty. They very well could be as dirty as a $2 *****, I have no idea. My point was just that a player taking money doesn't automatically make the school or the staff dirty. That's all I was saying.
Duke won't be next,or anytime after next,they have skated thru more scandalous issues than you can count and most have been well documented.The big unanswered question is how do they do it or why the NCAA has looked the other way for years?
K is a foul mouthed,ref intimidating crybaby.He presents one way in interviews and in front of the media and another during games and in what he teaches or allows players to do(flopping,tripping and head jerks)Why does everyone seem to be o k with the whole Duke fake persona
Umass and Memphis were punished. Duke wasn't. If both dirty, when does this happen? If both clean, why did they get punished? pretty flawed conclusion.Unfortunately, Cal is "dirty" because of the exact same thing (and a kid who may not have taken his SATs, like Cal is supposed to sit-in the testing room with him).
And that has hung over him and Kentucky ever since. It's affected his image and his recruiting, as coaches certainly use it against him.
Either K and Cal are both dirty, or they both aren't. And that 2010 title should effectively be removed
We here question why,no one else seems to do so.One thing is for sure, when Duke is involved things are not handled the same way or in the same time frame. So people are going to question why?
Unless I misunderstood your post, but how this could be Duke that outbid a school for a 2018 recruit when the only two guys that have picked Duke for next year is Tre Jones and Cam Reddish. Don't think Duke had to outbid someone for these two guys.
Also, I don't think Bagley had to be paid to reclass and be eligible for the draft a year earlier...that would be an easy answer.
And it's easy to wonder why the recruiting picked up, K's association with USA Basketball, Capel and the fact that they went all in with OADs. They are selling showcasing the player and fast track to the NBA...pretty simple.
Umass and Memphis were punished. Duke wasn't. If both dirty, when does this happen? If both clean, why did they get punished? pretty flawed conclusion.
That's essentially what I'm saying. Speaking strictly on Umass, it was the same thing. Cal/Umass get tarnished, forever.. Duke doesn't.
Are they also selling that once they get to the NBA they will fizzle out and end up on the far end of the bench? That is what is happening with most of their one and dones.
After reading through this thread, I hate Duke now more than ever.