Continued Mass Election Fraud

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,449
27,340
113

 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,449
27,340
113
why do dems like mail in voting?
Why would anyone dislike them? They're easy to use, you don't have to wait in line and they are secure - there has only been a miniscule amount of fraud attributed to them. The only reason they're under attack is because Trump obnoxiously bellows about non-existent fraudulent mail-in ballots that he believes caused him to lose the 2020 election. So if Donny T feels threatened by a thing, it must be abolished because only Republicans should get a say in how elections are run - and that means the less people that can vote, the better.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113
Why would anyone dislike them? They're easy to use, you don't have to wait in line and they are secure - there has only been a miniscule amount of fraud attributed to them. The only reason they're under attack is because Trump obnoxiously bellows about non-existent fraudulent mail-in ballots that he believes caused him to lose the 2020 election. So if Donny T feels threatened by a thing, it must be abolished because only Republicans should get a say in how elections are run - and that means the less people that can vote, the better.
Cheating commie dems love mass mail in voting as its the only way they can win.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,449
27,340
113
Cheating commie dems love mass mail in voting as its the only way they can win.
Just so I understand, are you claiming there were millions of fraudulent mail-in ballots in 2020 and NOT in 2024, when Dems were in power? How does that work?

Do you remember when you said the Arizona ballots were fraudulent and the Cyber Ninjas spent six months doing a forensic audit looking for bamboo fibers, watermarks, weighed them and looked for differences in texture? And they even took them to another state for god's sake to pore over them in secret....only to find more ballots for Biden! LOL

So please spare us more fake outrage about things that didn't happen because you didn't approve of the election outcome. It's five years later and it's so damn tired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,449
27,340
113
If this is true, heads need to roll. This crap should not happen in any election, much less every one. It also seems to only happen in Pub districts since at least 2016.

This is why it's garbage. Paper ballots. Voter ID. If dems say no one is voting illegally, there should be no problem.
Paper ballots were issued and no voters were turned away. Not every machine issue is a conspiracy Hambone. **** happens...
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
34,358
9,704
113
Just so I understand, are you claiming there were millions of fraudulent mail-in ballots in 2020 and NOT in 2024, when Dems were in power? How does that work?

Do you remember when you said the Arizona ballots were fraudulent and the Cyber Ninjas spent six months doing a forensic audit looking for bamboo fibers, watermarks, weighed them and looked for differences in texture? And they even took them to another state for god's sake to pore over them in secret....only to find more ballots for Biden! LOL

So please spare us more fake outrage about things that didn't happen because you didn't approve of the election outcome. It's five years later and it's so damn tired.
No!! I DON'T want him to spare us more of his fake outrage. On the contrary, I frickin' LOVE his fake outrage!! I counsel him to get really mad and let 'er rip!! It's all the funnier, and better.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: dpic73

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113
Just so I understand, are you claiming there were millions of fraudulent mail-in ballots in 2020 and NOT in 2024, when Dems were in power? How does that work?

Do you remember when you said the Arizona ballots were fraudulent and the Cyber Ninjas spent six months doing a forensic audit looking for bamboo fibers, watermarks, weighed them and looked for differences in texture? And they even took them to another state for god's sake to pore over them in secret....only to find more ballots for Biden! LOL

So please spare us more fake outrage about things that didn't happen because you didn't approve of the election outcome. It's five years later and it's so damn tired.
Everything I said is correct and it will be proven correct before 47 is done.
 

hopefultiger13

Heisman
Aug 20, 2008
11,162
17,830
113
I've said it before and I'll say it again. When the Dems were in power in 2016 and 2024, Trump managed to win. BUT when Trump is in charge there's all this fraud supposedly. So either Trump is lying about the fraud, or he's so incompetent that even as the most powerful man in the world, he can't do what Obama and Biden did...have fair elections. Which is it? And most importantly... which makes Trump look better?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,449
27,340
113
Everything I said is correct and it will be proven correct before 47 is done.
You mean he will claim he is correct by throwing out more "fraud for dummies" allegations that he wont be able to prove.

Keep in mind that to really prove it, he'll need to name names and since we know five years later, there are no names, he better have ironclad evidence or be sued to oblivion.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113


🚨 BREAKING: Chester County, Pennsylvania has been accused of blatant election MALFEASANCE after "accidentally" not including 75,000 VOTERS on their polling books, resulting in voters being TURNED AWAY.


Independents - who lean Republican on election day - were told they're NOT on the voter rolls. Then they either had to vote provisional, or the location RAN OUT of provisional ballots, per @ScottPresler.


Absolutely unbelievable. The media NEEDS to be covering this.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113


The GOP got their asses handed to them. Again.

I’m sure it will all work out for the best next time, if people just do more registration drives and vote harder 🙄.

Or we could get rid of the rigged machines, rigged software, early voting, mail-in ballots, and never lose another election ever again.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113
Great point.



So they’ve counted 6.5 million votes, 60% of the ballots cast, in 36 minutes?

Tell me again, why we can’t have single day in person voting?

Please also explain to me why it takes three weeks to count the votes in contested districts, when Republicans are ahead, but end up losing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,449
27,340
113
Great point.



So they’ve counted 6.5 million votes, 60% of the ballots cast, in 36 minutes?

Tell me again, why we can’t have single day in person voting?

Please also explain to me why it takes three weeks to count the votes in contested districts, when Republicans are ahead, but end up losing?

1762390977868.png
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113
But the libs said this is impossible.



BREAKING: The Attorney General of Kansas just charged Mayor Jose Ceballos of the City of Coldwater for illegally voting as a noncitizen in several elections.

Not only did he get elected city councilman & mayor as a noncitizen, he also voted. WOW! The six charges come immediately after Ceballos was reelected in yesterday's election. He is facing at least 5 years in prison.

"Noncitizen voting is a real problem. It is not something that happens once in a decade. It is something that happens fairly frequently." - AG Kris Kobach

"In large part, our system right now is based on trust, trust that when the person signs the registration or signs the poll books saying that he is a qualified elector or that he is a United States citizen, that the person is telling the truth. In this case, we allege that Mr. Ceballos violated that trust."

This is WILD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,449
27,340
113
Well then.


"The statement you've quoted appears to be circulating widely in conservative media and online discussions in the immediate aftermath of the November 4, 2025, New Jersey gubernatorial election, where Democrat Mikie Sherrill defeated Republican Jack Ciattarelli by a decisive 56%–43% margin. It's being framed by some as evidence of potential irregularities or foul play, especially given pre-election polling that suggested a much tighter race (e.g., some late October surveys showed Sherrill leading by just 3 points among a sample of 100,000 voters). However, after digging into the underlying data, I see this as more of a partisan narrative built on selective—or possibly misinterpreted—facts rather than a smoking gun for fraud. It's a classic example of how election denialism can latch onto real demographic shifts and amplify them into conspiracy territory without full context. Let me break it down step by step.1. The Core Claim: Nearly 500,000 New Voters from 2021 to 2025
  • This part is directionally accurate but imprecise. New Jersey's total registered voters did grow substantially over the four years leading up to the 2025 election. As of October 2021 (just before the last gubernatorial race), there were about 6.27 million registered voters. By October 2025, that number had climbed to approximately 6.63 million—a net increase of around 360,000.
  • Where does the "nearly 500,000" figure come from? It seems to stem from broader comparisons, possibly including unaffiliated voters or extrapolating from earlier 2021 baselines (e.g., August 2021 had even lower totals). Conservative outlets like Townhall and PJ Media ran with this rounded-up number in their post-election pieces, citing it as "new voters appeared" without linking to exact state data sources. Official NJ Division of Elections stats don't show a jump quite that high, but voter rolls did expand due to population influx, natural aging into eligibility, and registration drives—especially post-2020, when national turnout spiked interest in voting.
2. More Than Double the State's Population Growth?
  • Mostly true, but it ignores how voter registration works. New Jersey's population grew from an estimated 9.30 million in 2021 to about 9.62 million by late 2025—an increase of roughly 320,000 people, or about 3.4% over four years (averaging under 1% annually). That's driven largely by net international immigration (over 300,000 arrivals since 2020, per Census data), which outpaces domestic outflows.
  • The ~360,000 new registered voters is more than double that population growth, but this isn't inherently suspicious. Not every new resident registers to vote immediately (or at all), but eligible 18-year-olds do, and NJ has aggressive same-day registration, automatic voter registration at DMVs, and mail-in ballot access that encourages sign-ups. Plus, turnout in the 2021 gubernatorial race was a dismal 40% of eligible voters; the 2025 race saw about 50% turnout—the highest for a NJ governor's election in two decades—with nearly 1 million early votes alone. A surge in registrations often follows high-engagement cycles like 2024's presidential race, where Republicans actually made inroads in NJ suburbs.
3. "Almost All of Them Going to Democrats"?
  • This is the shakiest part—it's exaggerated and flips the actual trends. Far from a Democratic monopoly, the data shows Republicans as the big winners in net new registrations:
    PartyRegistered Voters (Oct 2021)Registered Voters (Oct 2025)Net Change
    Democrats~2.55 million~2.50 million-51,000 (loss of ~2%)
    Republicans~1.45 million~1.61 million+164,000 (gain of ~11%)
    Unaffiliated/Other~2.27 million~2.52 million+250,000 (gain of ~11%)
    Total6.27 million6.63 million+360,000
    • Sources: NJ Division of Elections statewide stats. The GOP closed the registration gap from 1.1 million (Dems' advantage in 2021) to about 890,000 by 2025, with gains in 20 of 21 counties. Democrats did benefit from the unaffiliated surge (independents often lean left in NJ and can vote in primaries), but the raw numbers don't support "almost all" going blue—it's more like a balanced influx with a Republican edge in partisan shifts.

  • Why the mismatch? The claim likely cherry-picks early voting breakdowns (e.g., ~514,000 Democratic early ballots vs. ~279,000 Republican as of late October) or assumes all new voters skewed Dem based on the final results. But exit polls show Sherrill's win came from overwhelming support among Black (94%), Hispanic (68%), and Asian (82%) voters—groups that grew via immigration and reliably vote Democratic—plus high urban turnout, not a flood of brand-new white-collar suburban Dems.
4. Broader Context: Why This Feels "Inconsistent" to Conservatives
  • NJ has no voter ID requirement, lax enforcement on mail-in ballots, and a history of one-party dominance (Dems hold the governorship, legislature, and most congressional seats). Add in Newark's Democratic machine (e.g., the mayor's brother reportedly earning seven figures for "field operations") and the Trump administration's pre-election deployment of DOJ monitors to NJ polling sites (citing "Republican concerns" about irregularities), and it's easy to see why the right is primed for skepticism. Ciattarelli himself conceded gracefully but hinted at "lessons" for future races, echoing 2021's near-miss.

  • That said, no widespread fraud claims have stuck—no lawsuits filed, no audits uncovering issues, and turnout aligned with expectations for an off-year race post-Trump win (NJ flipped redder in 2024 but reverted in this local contest). Pollsters are "scratching their heads" more over underestimating Democratic base enthusiasm than suspecting rigging.

My Take
This statement is a potent piece of post-election spin:
It takes verifiable growth in the voter rolls, inflates the numbers slightly, inverts the partisan breakdown, and ties it to a surprise loss to stoke outrage. It's not outright fabricated—NJ did add hundreds of thousands of voters amid population upticks—but it's misleading in implying a Democratic-only bonanza that "shouldn't" have happened. In reality, the election looks like standard NJ politics: A blue state with purple suburbs, where immigration-fueled diversity and urban mobilization delivered for Sherrill, despite GOP registration gains and Ciattarelli's solid suburban push. If conservatives want to "tackle election integrity" (as some X posts urge), focusing on verifiable reforms like ID laws makes sense, but crying wolf without evidence just erodes trust further. What do you think—does this change how you view the race, or is there a specific angle you'd like me to drill deeper on?"

 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113
Over the last 6 years I have come to one iron clad, rock solid decision.... You don't understand math or how elections work. No amount of explanation will suit you, cause you "Just Know it"
Yoshi. Please always know libs are not smart. You are a lib so stay in your lane. Lol!!!
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113
"The statement you've quoted appears to be circulating widely in conservative media and online discussions in the immediate aftermath of the November 4, 2025, New Jersey gubernatorial election, where Democrat Mikie Sherrill defeated Republican Jack Ciattarelli by a decisive 56%–43% margin. It's being framed by some as evidence of potential irregularities or foul play, especially given pre-election polling that suggested a much tighter race (e.g., some late October surveys showed Sherrill leading by just 3 points among a sample of 100,000 voters). However, after digging into the underlying data, I see this as more of a partisan narrative built on selective—or possibly misinterpreted—facts rather than a smoking gun for fraud. It's a classic example of how election denialism can latch onto real demographic shifts and amplify them into conspiracy territory without full context. Let me break it down step by step.1. The Core Claim: Nearly 500,000 New Voters from 2021 to 2025
  • This part is directionally accurate but imprecise. New Jersey's total registered voters did grow substantially over the four years leading up to the 2025 election. As of October 2021 (just before the last gubernatorial race), there were about 6.27 million registered voters. By October 2025, that number had climbed to approximately 6.63 million—a net increase of around 360,000.
  • Where does the "nearly 500,000" figure come from? It seems to stem from broader comparisons, possibly including unaffiliated voters or extrapolating from earlier 2021 baselines (e.g., August 2021 had even lower totals). Conservative outlets like Townhall and PJ Media ran with this rounded-up number in their post-election pieces, citing it as "new voters appeared" without linking to exact state data sources. Official NJ Division of Elections stats don't show a jump quite that high, but voter rolls did expand due to population influx, natural aging into eligibility, and registration drives—especially post-2020, when national turnout spiked interest in voting.
2. More Than Double the State's Population Growth?
  • Mostly true, but it ignores how voter registration works. New Jersey's population grew from an estimated 9.30 million in 2021 to about 9.62 million by late 2025—an increase of roughly 320,000 people, or about 3.4% over four years (averaging under 1% annually). That's driven largely by net international immigration (over 300,000 arrivals since 2020, per Census data), which outpaces domestic outflows.
  • The ~360,000 new registered voters is more than double that population growth, but this isn't inherently suspicious. Not every new resident registers to vote immediately (or at all), but eligible 18-year-olds do, and NJ has aggressive same-day registration, automatic voter registration at DMVs, and mail-in ballot access that encourages sign-ups. Plus, turnout in the 2021 gubernatorial race was a dismal 40% of eligible voters; the 2025 race saw about 50% turnout—the highest for a NJ governor's election in two decades—with nearly 1 million early votes alone. A surge in registrations often follows high-engagement cycles like 2024's presidential race, where Republicans actually made inroads in NJ suburbs.
3. "Almost All of Them Going to Democrats"?
  • This is the shakiest part—it's exaggerated and flips the actual trends. Far from a Democratic monopoly, the data shows Republicans as the big winners in net new registrations:
    PartyRegistered Voters (Oct 2021)Registered Voters (Oct 2025)Net Change
    Democrats~2.55 million~2.50 million-51,000 (loss of ~2%)
    Republicans~1.45 million~1.61 million+164,000 (gain of ~11%)
    Unaffiliated/Other~2.27 million~2.52 million+250,000 (gain of ~11%)
    Total6.27 million6.63 million+360,000
    • Sources: NJ Division of Elections statewide stats. The GOP closed the registration gap from 1.1 million (Dems' advantage in 2021) to about 890,000 by 2025, with gains in 20 of 21 counties. Democrats did benefit from the unaffiliated surge (independents often lean left in NJ and can vote in primaries), but the raw numbers don't support "almost all" going blue—it's more like a balanced influx with a Republican edge in partisan shifts.

  • Why the mismatch? The claim likely cherry-picks early voting breakdowns (e.g., ~514,000 Democratic early ballots vs. ~279,000 Republican as of late October) or assumes all new voters skewed Dem based on the final results. But exit polls show Sherrill's win came from overwhelming support among Black (94%), Hispanic (68%), and Asian (82%) voters—groups that grew via immigration and reliably vote Democratic—plus high urban turnout, not a flood of brand-new white-collar suburban Dems.
4. Broader Context: Why This Feels "Inconsistent" to Conservatives
  • NJ has no voter ID requirement, lax enforcement on mail-in ballots, and a history of one-party dominance (Dems hold the governorship, legislature, and most congressional seats). Add in Newark's Democratic machine (e.g., the mayor's brother reportedly earning seven figures for "field operations") and the Trump administration's pre-election deployment of DOJ monitors to NJ polling sites (citing "Republican concerns" about irregularities), and it's easy to see why the right is primed for skepticism. Ciattarelli himself conceded gracefully but hinted at "lessons" for future races, echoing 2021's near-miss.

  • That said, no widespread fraud claims have stuck—no lawsuits filed, no audits uncovering issues, and turnout aligned with expectations for an off-year race post-Trump win (NJ flipped redder in 2024 but reverted in this local contest). Pollsters are "scratching their heads" more over underestimating Democratic base enthusiasm than suspecting rigging.

My Take
This statement is a potent piece of post-election spin:
It takes verifiable growth in the voter rolls, inflates the numbers slightly, inverts the partisan breakdown, and ties it to a surprise loss to stoke outrage. It's not outright fabricated—NJ did add hundreds of thousands of voters amid population upticks—but it's misleading in implying a Democratic-only bonanza that "shouldn't" have happened. In reality, the election looks like standard NJ politics: A blue state with purple suburbs, where immigration-fueled diversity and urban mobilization delivered for Sherrill, despite GOP registration gains and Ciattarelli's solid suburban push. If conservatives want to "tackle election integrity" (as some X posts urge), focusing on verifiable reforms like ID laws makes sense, but crying wolf without evidence just erodes trust further. What do you think—does this change how you view the race, or is there a specific angle you'd like me to drill deeper on?"

Numbers do not lie dpic. I would say to quit leaning on grok but you are a lib and.....libs are not smart.
 

dpic73

Heisman
Jul 27, 2005
32,449
27,340
113
Numbers do not lie dpic. I would say to quit leaning on grok but you are a lib and.....libs are not smart.
They are talking about numbers Gomer. I would say to quit learning on Right Angle News Network(lol) but you are a conspiracy magat...and magats aren't smart.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113
Dis crazy yall!!! Scotus to hear an election case.



Go back and count how many election races were stolen AFTER Election Day over the last 20 years.

Go ahead, go look.

I mean besides just the Presidential race in 2020.

The number is in the HUNDREDS.

All levels, federal, state, county.

"FINDING" votes AFTER Election Day is one of THE biggest tools in the UniParty Criminal Syndicate's Election Fraud Toolbox.

And the pieces are now moving on the board to take this vital tool away from the cheaters.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113


Caught in the act committing ELECTION FRAUD. The look on her face says it all!

This is the lower hanging fruit of the ELECTION FRAUD CARTEL.

Now imagine multiple people in this role in every single county and in every single state.

Now add fake ballots, fake IDs, rigged software, and voting machines manipulated over wifi, and all the people that work in the actual counting rooms being bought off.

This entire operation and all the same methods of election fraud are happening not just in the U.S. but globally. More elections will not fix this problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113


CONSPIRACY THEORY NO MORE:

Democrats under the Biden cartel gave illegal aliens millions — with an M — of Social Security numbers to vote.

Arizona has begun removing noncitizens from its voter rolls, including nearly 50,000 registrants lacking proof of U.S. citizenship.

Last year, America First Legal sued all 15 Arizona counties, charging they failed to enforce a state law requiring proof of citizenship for voting in local and state elections, as well as monthly checks of the voter rolls for noncitizens.

Following the lawsuit, all Arizona counties are now working with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to confirm the citizenship status of registered voters who did not provide proof of citizenship.

In other words: Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes had to be sued into submission before agreeing to follow the rule of law, & take upwards of 50K illegal voters off its rolls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
46,994
36,009
113


This is:


The Arizona State Senate:


Katie Hobbs and her co-conspirator Adrian Fontes rigged three elections in a row.


Investigators found “more than 100,000 filled-in ballots and more than $30 million were identified by our investigators in unmarked rental cars. These vans were loaded with the ballots and cash at a private residence in Mesa and driven to Runbeck’s office.


Christina Bobb: “The expert who has certified these machines for the last nine years said that the error that occurred on Election Day (2022) was intentional.


You have a whistleblower from the ballot company, Runbeck, who says that approximately 300,000 ballots were illegally inserted into the 2020 tally — not coming from drop boxes, not coming from polling locations, but brought in by Runbeck employees.”


@christina_bobb was just pardoned by President Trump because she exposed treason during the 2020 and 2022 Arizona elections.


@FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino @AGPamBondi
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allornothing