Comey to testify on Dec 17... again...

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
The former director of the F.B.I., James B. Comey, has reached an agreement with Republican lawmakers to testify behind closed doors about investigations into Hillary Clinton’s email server and whether President Trump’s campaign advisers colluded with the Russian government to steer the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

Republican lawmakers agreed to release a transcript of his testimony in 24 hours and to allow Mr. Comey to speak about the meeting publicly, he said on Twitter.
 
Last edited:

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
the following transcripts are from an earlier Comey testimony...

the follow-up questions will be based off these answers...





In the hearings’ final moments, Mr. Comey and Mr. Chaffetz engaged in what may be the most contentious exchange yet.

Mr. Chaffetz pressed Mr. Comey on whether the former secretary of state had provided access to classified information to a number of people who did not hold security clearances, including her lawyers and the people who managed her email server.

“Did Hillary Clinton give non-cleared people access to classified information?” Mr. Chaffetz asked.

“Yes,” Mr. Comey responded.

Mr. Chaffetz repeatedly questioned Mr. Comey why there shouldn’t be consequences for Mrs. Clinton or her lawyers for that breach of security. But Mr. Comey insisted that it would be nearly impossible to prosecute Mrs. Clinton for giving her lawyers access to the emails for the purpose of evaluating them.

“I think it would be a very tall order,” Mr. Comey said, to determine that “she was acting with criminal intent.”

That conclusion left Mr. Chaffetz shaking his head. But with time running out, he dropped the matter and handed questioning over to the panel’s top Democrat.
 
Last edited:

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
As the hearing approached its end, Mr. Comey discussed one email from Mrs. Clinton in 2011 that has drawn attention previously as a possible sign that Mrs. Clinton sought to evade rules for handling classified information. In an exchange with Jake Sullivan over trouble sending a classified document by fax, Mrs. Clinton instructed her aide to remove the headings and send it.

“It they can’t, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure,” she wrote then.

Mr. Comey said that email in particular had piqued his interest and was a focus of the investigation. It was also a subject of the investigators’ interview with her. Mr. Comey said that he learned that “nonpaper” was a term of art in the State Department for an unclassified form of a document that could be shared with, for example, foreign officials.

He said that, in the end, the problems with the secure fax – used for classified documents – were resolved and the document was sent to her properly, suggesting that there had not been any violation of rules for handling secrets.

Mr. Chaffetz pointedly asked why he did not see that as a reflection of intent. “You are very generous in your acceptance of that,” Mr. Chaffetz said.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
Beyond the impact on Mrs. Clinton’s political future, some of her former aides, both political appointees and officials still working at the State Department, face possible disciplinary actions from a security review now underway.

Mr. Comey said he could not address the specific question of what disciplinary measures might be taken, but he suggested that, in general, an official who did what Mrs. Clinton and her aides did would almost certainly be punished, though not charged criminally.

“There would be some range of discipline,” he said. “They might get fired. They might lose their clearance. They might get suspended for 30 days. There would be some discipline. Maybe just a reprimand — I doubt it.”

At the same time, he added that the disciplinary procedures would be moot if the official had left government service, as is the case with Mrs. Clinton’s closest aides.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
Mr. Comey said he did not take part in the interview of Mrs. Clinton last Saturday. Five or six agents carried it out and provided a summary to him. She was not under oath, but he quickly noted that “it’s still a crime to lie to the F.B.I.” There was no transcript.

Representative John L. Mica, a Republican from Florida, asked him to provide the summary of the notes, making clear that Republicans would pursue a referral to the bureau on the question of whether Mrs. Clinton lied in her testimony to the Benghazi Commission.

Mr. Mica began by holding up a chart with a timeline that began with Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch’s meeting with Bill Clinton last week, and included Mrs. Clinton’s interview on Saturday, Mr. Comey’s recommendation. It ended with the Justice Department decision on Wednesday evening to close the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s emails.

“This is rapid fire,” he said, adding that he wanted to be able to return to his district and explain the sequence. “My folks think there is something fishy about this. I’m not a conspiracy theorist but I have some questions about how this came down.”

Mr. Comey became visibly angry at that point, emphasizing with a tight voice that he had had no communication with anyone at the White House or the Justice Department about the timing or substance of his decision.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
In a sharp exchange two hours into the hearing, Mr. Comey made it clear that the decision not to recommend charges turned on the question of criminal intent, not the conduct itself, which he acknowledged amounted to mishandling classified information.

Representative Will Hurd of Texas, a Republican who served as an officer with the C.I.A., focused on the “top secret” emails on the server, leading Mr. Comey through the significance of “special access programs.” These are the most secret operations and sources in the intelligence world, including information provided by electronic means and people in harm’s way.

Mr. Hurd asked what was protecting the server, given that the investigation showed that at least seven chains of emails were classified at that level. “Well, not much,” Mr. Comey replied. He later acknowledged that the server was vulnerable to exposure to hostile countries.

Mr. Hurd said it was outrageous that there was not a recommendation to prosecute.

“What does it take for someone to misuse classified information and get in trouble for it?” he asked.

“It takes mishandling it and criminal intent,” Mr. Comey said.

“And so an unauthorized server in the basement is not mishandling?” Mr. Hurd said.

“Well, no, there is evidence of mishandling here,” Mr. Comey said. “This whole investigation at the end focused on: Is there sufficient evidence of intent?”

Mr. Hurd, like other Republicans, raised the question of precedent, asking whether the decision not to punish Mrs. Clinton sent a message to others in the government who handle classified information. He asked whether an employee of the F.B.I. should have a private server.

“They better not – that’s one of the reasons I’m talking about this,” Mr. Comey said. He added, “There will be discipline from termination to reprimand and everything in between for people who mishandle classified information.”
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
Mr. Comey added another detail that has become a matter of dispute with the State Department. He said that three emails included “portion marking,” in which certain paragraphs of a document are marked with notations indicating that the material is classified. In his statement on Tuesday he said there was “a very small” number.

A search of the emails released by the State Department turned up two of those, both memos from one of Mrs. Clinton’s aides, Monica R. Hanley, preparing her for telephone calls with world leaders. The State Department on Wednesday argued that those markings were, in fact, included by mistake.

Mr. Comey said today that there were three documents with the markings, but he did not elaborate on the subject except to say that it also bore the notation (C), indicating that it was classified as “confidential.” Presumably it was one of the emails that the F.B.I. reconstructed from Mrs. Clinton’s servers – or one that her lawyers did not turn over along with the others.

Representative Mark Meadows, Republican of North Carolina, pressed the witness on whether Mrs. Clinton should have recognized the notation. “I think it’s possible she didn’t understand what a ‘C’ meant when she saw it in the body of an email,” Mr. Comey replied.

Mr. Meadows said Mrs. Clinton had told the Benghazi Committee last October there were no documents marked classified and asked whether she had told the F.B.I. something different. Mr. Comey said he had not parsed her statements, but earlier said he did not believe she had misled the bureau’s agents.

Mr. Meadows raised the specter of more hearings on whether Mrs. Clinton had lied to the committee.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,091
693
0
An hour into the hearing, Mr. Comey offered a little more detail about the classified information that did pass through the server, though he did so obliquely – unable, of course, to discuss even the topic of the emails in a public hearing.

He said classified information was in “most circumstances” sent to her by her aides, but then he talked about one chain of emails that were classified as “top secret.” The State Department, at the insistence of the C.I.A., declined to release 22 emails in seven chains even in a redacted form. Mr. Comey previously said there were eight chains. According to intelligence and congressional officials, most of those, though not all, involve the C.I.A.’s secret drone strikes in Pakistan.

For the first time, Mr. Comey made it clear that Mrs. Clinton had typed an email in one of those “top secret” chains.

“In the one involving ‘top secret’ information, Secretary Clinton not only received but also sent emails that talked about the same subject,” Mr. Comey said

Representative Ron DeSantis, a Republican of Florida, asked whether it should have been obvious that the information was classified and thus not appropriate to discuss on an unclassified email system .

“Yes,” Mr. Comey said.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,230
3,298
113
Then declassify everything, fuckbag. My patience with this man is running very very thin.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,599
814
113
Why would Nadler want to continue an investigation that could hurt him?