Clemson ...
- Thread starter runningbears_rivals310920
- Start date
Lloyd with another dog crap March performance. Young head coach but sucks in March. Maybe he will eventually get better there.
Didn't take long for the usual Cal slurpers to show up.
Agree... but how does UK with the talent they have not even win a 1st round game!!
Unbelievable
Unbelievable
Had Zona as well. Unc gonna cakewalk to final four if bama can't beat them.
They have a knowledgeable coach
UNC continues to be a pure blood. UK is no longer in the discussion
Clemson has a great coach. I mean, Brownell would never be mentioned for a job like ours because he isnt a smooth talking, car salesman, but his teams are always well coached and tough as nails. They run an offense. They know how to stay in front of their man. They know how to guard screens. They have a coach that actually knows how to dictate tempo.
The more I watch these games, the more I get ticked at Cal.....such an unorganized and unprepared cluster---.
The more I watch these games, the more I get ticked at Cal.....such an unorganized and unprepared cluster---.
It’s not so much that Clemson looks better than Kentucky.
It’s that Clemson looks SO much better than our career-revving, five-years-in-coming, now-Cal-finally-has-dawgs-again renaissance we’re-finally-going-to-not-suck-again-well-I-mean-at-least-for-one-year team.
Clemson looks SO much better than THAT Kentucky team looks. I mean, looked before it got bounced on the freaking opening day of 64-team play.
It’s that Clemson looks SO much better than our career-revving, five-years-in-coming, now-Cal-finally-has-dawgs-again renaissance we’re-finally-going-to-not-suck-again-well-I-mean-at-least-for-one-year team.
Clemson looks SO much better than THAT Kentucky team looks. I mean, looked before it got bounced on the freaking opening day of 64-team play.
People have no idea how awful UT lucking up to win one would be. All I’ve heard for a few years is the ******** that U.K. can’t do what we’ve always done blah blah. They get to a final four and Calipari’s days are f’n numbered like never before.
Practicing D and inbounds plays While Cal is washing feet.
Clemson lost to the following teams this year
at home to Georgia Tech
Notre Dame
Miami
Boston College
at home to Virginia
Memphis
Wake Forest
at home to Georgia Tech
Notre Dame
Miami
Boston College
at home to Virginia
Memphis
Wake Forest
The Clemson HC probably watches film too. How does he find the time to do all that college HC stuff PLUS serve as a NBA pre-draft players’ agent? Can’t wait to see Brownell’s interview in the NBA draft night green room later this year—
GBB!
Clemson started 4 Seniors and a Junior.
Had 3 sophomores come off the bench. No freshmen played, as they only played 8 in the game !! A veteran club … !!
Had 3 sophomores come off the bench. No freshmen played, as they only played 8 in the game !! A veteran club … !!
Still doing better than Cal, I like where he’s trending at least.
Yup and apparently it didn’t matter. Elite 8
You forgot “Built for March” in there.
I like Brad actually. He's at a perfect spot at a football school where they only really expect you to make one significant run maybe every 5 years and the rest of the time they're ok with first round exits or the NIT as long as your record isn't abysmal.
Kentucky for him? No lol.
And we have 6 freshman incoming, and the most experienced player hitting the portal. Rinse repeat.
My post was not Sweet 16 related.
It was the fact that Clemson was playing in sweet 16 and UK LOST in 1st round.
I think any sports fan would look at these teams and say that UK has more talent and they lost to a 14 seed that had NAIA PLAYERS.
Simple point. Uk should still be playing on Thursday... they are not .. Clemson was.
It's not an indictment on Clemson as much as it is UK losing in 1st round. Again... to an inferior team... while not starting 2 possible top 10 lottery players.
You simply can NOT make this Ish up
It was the fact that Clemson was playing in sweet 16 and UK LOST in 1st round.
I think any sports fan would look at these teams and say that UK has more talent and they lost to a 14 seed that had NAIA PLAYERS.
Simple point. Uk should still be playing on Thursday... they are not .. Clemson was.
It's not an indictment on Clemson as much as it is UK losing in 1st round. Again... to an inferior team... while not starting 2 possible top 10 lottery players.
You simply can NOT make this Ish up
And some on this board want to hire their coach. How does that make sense? He would do it here too.
You're a clown. How long has it been since we've made it there? These feeble arguments you make would be laughable if you weren't so inept.
I’m a clown for posting facts? Sure unhinged weirdo. Mad because y’all’s ignorance keeps getting exposed. It’s not an argument, it’s literally a fact. Keep crying about it and it will still be a fact.
They just said that UNC was now tied with us for Sweet 16 appearances.
SMH