It's a puff piece because it literally takes every bad attribute about him, and just reframes it as a positive. It's like the interview question where you are asked what is your biggest weakness, and you answer that you just like to work too much.
1. Stubborn/uncoachable is reframed as "can't be corralled" "he's his own thinker" "he has his own drive" "you have to let the artist paint" "he's unique, ...not going to conform." - Give me a break. Try any of that **** with Saban. I don't know of any serious coach who wants a player who is his own thinker and does what he wants. But at the DJ, this is awesome stuff for a qb.
2. As was said earlier, nothing he did was his fault, and poor him has had to overcome "perception problems."
3. It's the government's fault (city hall). Poor Matt, everyone is just against him.
4. It's not just the MSU fight. Last year, at least, he was the most chippy on the team. Always taking a little pot shot after any play he got tackled on, and trying to start stuff. That's where the "punk" moniker came from.
All that said, he has definitely calmed down this year from what I've seen, and to get serious looks at QB at the next level, he needs to at least appear level headed and let the linemen do the chippy stuff. Also, he is definitely talented.
My comment is really just about why the article is a puff piece, not whether he's changed, or if he's good. It would have been much better for his image if the article wasn't filled with excuses for his past, and just said he's moved past it. They actually did him a disservice by including all the quotes from those who can't help but want to make excuses for him and blame everyone else, instead of just saying he's grown up (coach, momma, etc.).