Nathan Stanley started against Jacksonville State, but was replaced by Masoli.
I have to admit it's getting a little weird at this point, especially because the period spans now 3 different head coaches, but we've had one game in the last 9 seasons started by a QB that signed with Ole Miss out of high school. That said, I can't say that many of the transfers were bad moves, or that it's done anything to hurt us.
If Schaeffer or Masoli had been signed to play in either a Hugh Freeze or Dan Mullen style read option offense, they'd have both been wildly successful. Masoli still was pretty impressive playing in an offense that didn't fit, for a coach that didn't know how to use him. He was just on a crap team. Snead was very good, even playing for the "QB Killa" as they call him in Fayetteville. He went 18-8 as a starter, and he had 46 TDs in two seasons, though he did throw too many picks his second year. Bo was very successful obviously, winning now 24 games in 3 seasons and taking the team to 3 bowls while accounting for 82 total TDs.
Outside of 2011, where three transfer QBs all sucked, the transfers we've had have all been pretty good players, and were probably better than the lottery that is "developing" a QB. The majority of them were certainly better than the 3 high school recruited and developed QBs that we had starting in 2004 and 2005 (Spurlock, Lane, Flatt), and those guys were "developed" by the QB guru himself, David Cutcliffe. I know we'll have an open competition this spring, but I'd probably put my money on Kelly to win that competition, and that's fine with me. If he does, it means we will win more games than we would've won had we not signed him, and that's the goal.