***CC22 and the Fever mega thread***

Kceasthawk@77

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2005
2,601
4,703
113
Literally top 10 in efficiency right now

View attachment 1321210
What's that saying? "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics"? So Reese is a hair more efficient then CC22 while 95% of her shots are 4 ft from the basket, and Clarks are probably largely from 28ft away? Meanwhile Clark changes the entire defense and how it must cover the floor with EVERY step she takes while they basically ignore Reese unless she's within arms length of the basket. Okay then.... :rolleyes:
 

twindman

Junior
Sep 1, 2010
184
296
63
What's that saying? "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics"? So Reese is a hair more efficient then CC22 while 95% of her shots are 4 ft from the basket, and Clarks are probably largely from 28ft away? Meanwhile Clark changes the entire defense and how it must cover the floor with EVERY step she takes while they basically ignore Reese unless she's within arms length of the basket. Okay then.... :rolleyes:
I remember some stat comparing CC's length of shots to NBA players. She was a tiny bit longer than EVERY NBA Player!
 

AFM22

Heisman
Oct 31, 2022
17,583
33,776
113
What's that saying? "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics"? So Reese is a hair more efficient then CC22 while 95% of her shots are 4 ft from the basket, and Clarks are probably largely from 28ft away? Meanwhile Clark changes the entire defense and how it must cover the floor with EVERY step she takes while they basically ignore Reese unless she's within arms length of the basket. Okay then.... :rolleyes:
Sorry that I brought actual stats to refute your claim she's not efficient.

It's clear you have much more gripe against Reese as a person, which is fine, but to say she is not skilled is a ridiculous claim.
 

Kceasthawk@77

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2005
2,601
4,703
113
Sorry that I brought actual stats to refute your claim she's not efficient.

It's clear you have much more gripe against Reese as a person, which is fine, but to say she is not skilled is a ridiculous claim.
I've admitted she's good at what she does, I'm just not buying that she's "skilled" we can go round and round on your "stats" Like I said one player is literally standing under the damn basket and misses 60% of her shots, and you want to claim that makes her efficient because that's what some chart says. Okay then, she's more "efficient". The other player is guarded 94 ft and shoots often from near 30 ft. She changes the very way every team must defend not only her but every team mate because of her gravity. I guess I'll call that "impact". Reese put up a record number of dub/dubs as a rookie and her team lost almost all of those games. What was her "impact", with all this supposed efficiency and skill?
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldhawk56

AFM22

Heisman
Oct 31, 2022
17,583
33,776
113
I've admitted she's good at what she does, I'm just not buying that she's "skilled" we can go round and round on your "stats" Like I said one player is literally standing under the damn basket and misses 60% of her shots, and you want to claim that makes her efficient because that's what some chart says. Okay then, she's more "efficient". The other player is guarded 94 ft and shoots often from near 30 ft. She changes the very way every team must defend not only her but every team mate because of her gravity. I guess I'll call that "impact". Reese put up a record number of dub/dubs as a rookie and her team lost almost all of those games. What was her "impact", with all this supposed efficiency and skill?
I never said she was more efficient than Clark, that's what the chart says. Maybe its because Angel takes closer and more efficient shots and makes more of them. Clark is shooting 38%, fwiw that's not very efficient.

Your claim was that she has been least the least efficient player in the WNBA, I was just simply proving that stats say otherwise.