***CC22 and the Fever mega thread***

[Gonzo_Bloor]

Well, some of you are calling the game a complete meltdown by Indiana.

I not only don't feel that way. I not only predicted that NY would come back and win. But I was condfident enough they would come back to have been willing to pay a booking fee for the ability to risk my hard earned money on it.

So obviously, I had a pretty good feel for that game. And obviously, I wouldn't characterize it as anything close to an Indiana meltdown

Internet Winning High-Stakes Gambler Guy. Lol.

First there was Internet Tough Guy. Then there was Internet Married to a Hot Model Guy. Then there was Internet Rich Guy. Many others were to follow, but you have created the newest sub-genre of message board royalty.... the Internet Winning High-Stakes Gambler Guy.

Lol. Please don't ever stop posting.

 

[Cidhawkeye]

Haha totally missed the point which unfortunately Is not unusual with you. I'm merely reading along fascinated by how long it is like you will continue arguing with someone and idiots like those who do nothing but complain about the w continue to watch it. For those that enjoy watching good for them.

It isn’t really much of an ‘argument’ typically one of us has facts…… the other is someone like eyes who seems to think that being inaccurate is okay because they didn’t really mean to be inaccurate. And then doubling down on it. Then there is you, mocking others for doing what you are doing ….oh and pointing out to others that they missed the point. Rationalize and justify your actions all you want. Maybe it will circle back to you and you will figure it out when it comes around again.

 

[NORTHSTAR]

I know you're an idiot and wouldn't understand, but I'm laughing at the ones that do nothing but complain about how much the product sucks yet they keep watching. More power to those that enjoy that crap product.

You haven't said what you watch, so maybe others may think you watch a crap product(s).

 

[WDSMHawk]

Pretty good sign for Kate that Plum wants her on a full contract.

 

[2D]

Internet Winning High-Stakes Gambler Guy. Lol.

First there was Internet Tough Guy. Then there was Internet Married to a Hot Model Guy. Then there was Internet Rich Guy. Many others were to follow, but you have created the newest sub-genre of message board royalty.... the Internet Winning High-Stakes Gambler Guy.

Lol. Please don't ever stop posting.

Always remember, he was the guy who openly bragged about a losing bet he made and he got laughed at by the entire board. One of my favorite threads ever.

 

[eyesofhawk]

Always remember, he was the guy who openly bragged about a losing bet he made and he got laughed at by the entire board. One of my favorite threads ever.

This dumbass will never get it

 

[EvilMonkeyInTheCloset]

Dude, you really need to get a life. I'm not sure what you get out of making ridiculous accusations against people, and then consistently have those accusations shut down.

There's absolutely no reason to call me untrustworthy. The only people that do, seem to not be able to read worth a ****.

Why are you not telling others to keep their inaccurate overreactions to themselves?

Again, people are trying to make the game into an epic meltdown by Indiana. My first chime-in came in post #5329, in which I mentioned nothing about my winning wagers. I only said, "the Fever were never going to win that game".

Only after being mocked for that statement, did I mention my winning wagers, to provide supporting content and credibility.

Who would seem to have a better idea what they're talking about? People who can't even properly characterize the game AFTER its finish? Or someone who not only PREDICTED the type of finish for the game, but backed his prediction with money?

An epic meltdown is something that should not, in the least, be expected to happen. Whereas, to wager on something, takes a good deal of confident expectation in that particular outcome.

Mentioning my winning wagers is completely relevant in showing the difference between having a clue, and not. But you go ahead and believe whatever you want. That's what you do anyway

Ok, Phil.

 

[EvilMonkeyInTheCloset]

Have you ever known a sports fan to apologize for anything? That's hilarious!

Why would we apologize to you?

You've never admitted you're wrong, so why should we?

 

[EvilMonkeyInTheCloset]

This dumbass will never get it

Ok, Phil.

 

[Iron Doc]

Ol' Eyes, like roach infestations, cannot be defeated.
If nothing else survives a nuclear holocaust, they will.

Occasionally I think about taking him off ignore for the entertainment value.
I don't because his posts are too mind numbing, kind of like watching the HypnoToad.

 

[Bro D]

White fired yet?

 

[huntinghawk]

Have you ever known a sports fan to apologize for anything? That's hilarious!

And has nothing to do with my point.

The overreactors saw the game one way. I saw it another way. And mentioned, that I knew what I was seeing well enough to have backed it (and correctly backed it) with money.

Even after having posting the winning wagers, you said I'll only earn respect by posting them prior to the game. (Which is also hilarious, as I've said most of them were IN-GAME wagers).

And to that, I asked how the overreactors are to earn any respect.

My contention was with the overreactions. The point was never about the winning wagers.

If you're going to enter a conversation, you need to follow along much better.

And I've already explained, that I'm not in the business of giving out winners. Sure, I could post the in-game bets immediately, without fear of getting priced out of an already tiny edge. But you see, I'm actually paying attention to the game enough to be able to work it, which is a lot. So, I will not be coming on here to post in the middle of games. I have nothing to prove to any of you guys

You need to read better. The overreacted should apologize if they are wrong and want your respect. You should post some of your in game wagers for a short period to prove you know what you're talking about regarding the fever only. You can keep the rest hush hush.

 

[huntinghawk]

You haven't said what you watch, so maybe others may think you watch a crap product(s).

It doesn't matter what I watch unless I complained about how awful it is or how Im never watching again. Any show out there if it's a crappy product or a bad show I don't watch. That's why I don't watch the WNBA, and why I find it funny how many complain about it or say they are done, but still watch every game

 

[eyesofhawk]

Ok, Phil.

Ok, Phil.

Phil?

 

[eyesofhawk]

Why would we apologize to you?

You've never admitted you're wrong, so why should we?

I never suggested anyone should apologize to anyone. Read better.

I haven't been wrong about anything to admit to

 

[eyesofhawk]

You need to read better. The overreacted should apologize if they are wrong and want your respect. You should post some of your in game wagers for a short period to prove you know what you're talking about regarding the fever only. You can keep the rest hush hush.

An apology does nothing to add credibility.

Which seemed to be easy enough to understand all along

 

[Hawksfor3]

Tonight. Fever @ Mystics. 6PM. Peacock/NBCSN. Tune in for this Extravaganza.