CATS @ #5 in AP

Jazzycat

All-Conference
May 23, 2002
16,089
4,684
113
That is a good spot for UK. They just need a good seeding for the NCAA....young team, will suffer some ups and downs this year....what matters is what they look like in February....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brando Mac

poppycat

All-Conference
Sep 23, 2006
3,757
1,467
0
And the good thing, we have 3 good opportunities ahead
to prove it's deserved or to move up before conference play.
 
Last edited:

bluekid

Freshman
Nov 27, 2015
111
82
0
I agree, we should be about 3. 5 is too low. Kansas is no good. Michigan St. a joke at #1. How does a Louisville move up after losing a 13 pt 1st half lead, what an F-n joke.
 

BlueBomb

Heisman
Apr 3, 2009
10,753
19,748
103
I'll take it. Because we certainly aren't playing like a top five team.
 

Cats192

Heisman
Apr 22, 2011
14,902
17,816
93
Wait, what?!

I said after the loss I'd expect us to be anywhere from 6-11. 5 is surprising. Now you're saying because they put us at 5--and not THREE, everyone is disrespecting us?

We got shell shocked by an unranked team. They beat the (then #1)#5 team in the country and UCLA is still unranked. People don't view them as that good of a team. And they still saw it fit to put is in the top 5.
 

TheDonJiggy

Sophomore
Jan 17, 2015
310
173
0
I never thought we would stick around that high in the polls. But I did think a win over Duke on a neutral floor would hold more weight than a true road loss at UCLA.
 

bluekid

Freshman
Nov 27, 2015
111
82
0
I agree Jiggy, that is my point, we travel across country to play on a Thursday night 3 time zones away (don't get me started on that), this was a classic set up game for a loss. Not saying 5 is not warranted, just that I believe we are much better than the teams ahead of us when all things are equal. The Duke win, should have more merit. Like I said, you hear people say, this team is more of a team than last year after that game. Now after this game, this club is soft, they aren't good and will be the worst team since the 13 club
 

Cats192

Heisman
Apr 22, 2011
14,902
17,816
93
I'm good with the rankings - thought they'd put us around #8. Probably should've been at #5 to start the season - but hindsight is 20/20

I was kind of surprised by the #1 this season. It's one thing when you get the Harrison twins and WCS back to go with a crazy good recruiting class like Towns, Lyles, Ulis, etc.

But after losing so much, I honestly thought we'd be closer to #5 or so in the pre-season polls
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bkocats

KWilt43atbuzz

All-American
Nov 18, 2012
17,050
6,848
0
I never thought we would stick around that high in the polls. But I did think a win over Duke on a neutral floor would hold more weight than a true road loss at UCLA.

Not just that but Ulis, Lee and Poy were not at 100% for that game.

It looks like the pollsters took all of that into consideration as they should have.

Watch what we do to Eastern on Wed. night and then watch what we do to ASU on Sat.

Barring injuries or set backs to guys banged up I predict we blow both of them out of the gym.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bkocats

uk78_rivals88018

All-American
Feb 6, 2003
12,401
8,783
0
Last year Duke got their asses handed to them against Miami losing by a larger margin than we did to UCLA. They won the national championship, so an early or even mid-season loss or two isn't the end of the world if you see improvement. Kentucky looked awful against UCLA, and as I had posted after South Florida, that despite crushing them, we were losing a lot of rebounds in the second half to a marginal team that was dominating us in the paint. So, there were and perhaps still some flaws to this current team. I don't disagree with Booker's post either that we are soft, which might have been done to motivate the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mark Gastineau

SparksCat

All-Conference
Mar 31, 2009
719
1,338
0
Guys. We aren't a top 10 team. We may be by March but how they played Thursday was high school ball at best. Have to learn to do more than rely on dunks/lobs, have to rebound and defend.

I hope we figure out what to do if the other teams clog the lane again
 

Poetax

Heisman
Apr 4, 2002
29,410
20,887
0
I'll take it. Because we certainly aren't playing like a top five team.

You're correct but I am glad that one reason that it changed was because of injuries not while everyone is healthy. Early December and we have had Humphries hurt and missed games, Ulis hurt and missed games, and then played hurt. and then Lee who was hurt and missed almost all of the UCLA game.
 

Chuckinden

All-American
Jun 12, 2006
19,000
5,953
113
Not just that but Ulis, Lee and Poy were not at 100% for that game.

It looks like the pollsters took all of that into consideration as they should have.

Watch what we do to Eastern on Wed. night and then watch what we do to ASU on Sat.

Barring injuries or set backs to guys banged up I predict we blow both of them out of the gym.
You forgot to mention that Cal didn't sleep well the night before the game.
The gym was too hot during the shootaround.
Skal is still have lingering effects from that earthquake.
Willis slipped off to the nearest Indian reservation to visit his kinfolk.
Humphries lost his stuffed Koala bear.

There was no way we shouldn't still be #1 if the voters was privy to all this info as to why we couldn't beat an unranked team that lost to Monmouth.
 

Honeydikkin79

Redshirt
Apr 17, 2015
137
34
0
I agree, we should be about 3. 5 is too low. Kansas is no good. Michigan St. a joke at #1. How does a Louisville move up after losing a 13 pt 1st half lead, what an F-n joke.
uhh.... Kansas no good? Michigan state a joke at #1? What the hell are you smoking? This year it's wide open man, there's not a dominat team out there .. Well except UK ( around March ) other than that, those teams deserve to be at the top right now and really who cares... You can be #1 all year but it really comes down to March and that's all that matters my friend..
 
  • Like
Reactions: kyjeff1

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,281
72,052
113
I agree, we should be about 3. 5 is too low. Kansas is no good. Michigan St. a joke at #1. How does a Louisville move up after losing a 13 pt 1st half lead, what an F-n joke.
Man, you aren't biased one bit.
How can MSU be a joke @ #1? They are playing by far the best RIGHT NOW. That will eventually change though as their ceiling is lower.
Kansas is no good??? Again, you are letting your hatred cloud your judgment. What are you going to say if they beat the crap out of UK in January? Are they all the sudden going to be great after that?
You think UK should be #3 huh? I was ecstatic with the ranking we were given, the pollsters must not have seen the game Thursday night. I had us at 8 or 9 based on what they (the polls) did to UNC after they lost a true road game without their pg.
Sometimes you have to take the blue goggles off.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,281
72,052
113
We lose one game and everyone around the country goes from us being better than last years team, to our worst team since the NIT team. Go figure
Exaggerate much? Nobody said this team is /was better than last year's team and nobody said that they are worse than the 13 team. Get a grip.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,281
72,052
113
I agree Jiggy, that is my point, we travel across country to play on a Thursday night 3 time zones away (don't get me started on that), this was a classic set up game for a loss. Not saying 5 is not warranted, just that I believe we are much better than the teams ahead of us when all things are equal. The Duke win, should have more merit. Like I said, you hear people say, this team is more of a team than last year after that game. Now after this game, this club is soft, they aren't good and will be the worst team since the 13 club
I think you are putting too much of a positive spin on this years team at this point in the season. This team has gaping holes in it's game right now snd the last thing we want is to compare UK to KU or MSU. Yes we beat Duke but since then we have showed we have a lot of warts. We definitely are not "much better than the teams that are ahead of us". Pump the brakes. We got a gift by getting the #5 spot in the rankings. We lost to a 3 loss team that is poorly coached and doesn't have tge talent we have. We should be ranked in the 7 or 8 spot IMO.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,281
72,052
113
Exc
Not just that but Ulis, Lee and Poy were not at 100% for that game.

It looks like the pollsters took all of that into consideration as they should have.

Watch what we do to Eastern on Wed. night and then watch what we do to ASU on Sat.

Barring injuries or set backs to guys banged up I predict we blow both of them out of the gym.
Excuses excuses. We lost to a bad team. Look what they did to UNC** after they lost a true road game without their best player/point guard. They dropped UNC** to 9 from 1.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,281
72,052
113
Last year Duke got their asses handed to them against Miami losing by a larger margin than we did to UCLA. They won the national championship, so an early or even mid-season loss or two isn't the end of the world if you see improvement. Kentucky looked awful against UCLA, and as I had posted after South Florida, that despite crushing them, we were losing a lot of rebounds in the second half to a marginal team that was dominating us in the paint. So, there were and perhaps still some flaws to this current team. I don't disagree with Booker's post either that we are soft, which might have been done to motivate the team.
Duke also won on the road at Wisconsin before the Miami debacle. That goes a long way on the confidence scale.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,281
72,052
113
Guys. We aren't a top 10 team. We may be by March but how they played Thursday was high school ball at best. Have to learn to do more than rely on dunks/lobs, have to rebound and defend.

I hope we figure out what to do if the other teams clog the lane again
Perfect post. How anyone thinks we got shafted by getting the 5 spot in the rankings is laughable. We have looked really bad in every game since the duke game. We looked awful Thursday night, "High school ball at best" is a good way to describe what we saw from UK.
I don't think some people realize just how bad UCLA is.
 

kyjeff1

Heisman
Sep 8, 2012
51,281
72,052
113
You forgot to mention that Cal didn't sleep well the night before the game.
The gym was too hot during the shootaround.
Skal is still have lingering effects from that earthquake.
Willis slipped off to the nearest Indian reservation to visit his kinfolk.
Humphries lost his stuffed Koala bear.

There was no way we shouldn't still be #1 if the voters was privy to all this info as to why we couldn't beat an unranked team that lost to Monmouth.
Well done sir.
The excuses from some of our fans are hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckinden

UKWildcats#8

All-American
Jun 25, 2011
30,327
9,338
0
I figured we would have dropped more. We lost to a mediocre UCLA team by double digits and we could hardly even get it to single digits the whole 2nd half. Having said that, the three teams that for sure should be ahead of us after said loss are so I cannot argue that much. ISU makes sense as well seeing as they are undefeated.
 

WeWant9

Heisman
Dec 18, 2013
6,953
18,501
113
I was thinking 7 or 8, but this has been an already crazy season with a lot of ranked upsets. I think the top 25 will do a lot of shuffling this year.

As long as we stay in the top 15, with a late season surge I'll be happy. I think seeding will be important to us this year, to try and secure a chance at playing the S16 and E8 in Louisville. The last 4 NCAAT games at yum were basically a home game.
 

IYAOYAS1

All-Conference
Dec 15, 2006
31,798
4,445
78
Most coaches with an BB IQ realize that UCLA played out of their minds and UK faced a whistle not seen this year, and that Lee is a huge factor. This loss is one L that you write off and trust me - UCLA wants no part of this UK team come March!
 

KWilt43atbuzz

All-American
Nov 18, 2012
17,050
6,848
0
You forgot to mention that Cal didn't sleep well the night before the game.
The gym was too hot during the shootaround.
Skal is still have lingering effects from that earthquake.
Willis slipped off to the nearest Indian reservation to visit his kinfolk.
Humphries lost his stuffed Koala bear.

There was no way we shouldn't still be #1 if the voters was privy to all this info as to why we couldn't beat an unranked team that lost to Monmouth.

Your racist comment tells me all I need to know.
I stated facts while you went off on a goofy and racist tangent.
Truth hurts doesnt it? We were banged up and lost by 10 at UCLA. If healthy which we should be on Wed. Nite we win the game.
See how that works?
 

KWilt43atbuzz

All-American
Nov 18, 2012
17,050
6,848
0
Well done sir.
The excuses from some of our fans are hilarious.

Wow Jeff. You condoning a racist post drops you down a few pegs in my big blue book.
Also, dont confuse excuses like that clown gave with the injury facts I gave.
Dont gravitate to the darkside Jeff.
 

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,947
34,467
113
Duke @ Wisconsin in december... didnt have a Duke team where Winslow got injured early and Jones not being able to shoot right due to an elbow injury.