Cam reddish

KentuckyCat420

Heisman
Sep 16, 2006
38,468
26,927
72
If we don’t get Zion, who is better then all of them, it’s because PJ and Vanderbilt are still here which would probably be good for us.
 
Oct 26, 2016
739
587
0
Reddish and Barrett will both under develop at Duke.
Eventually recruits will catch on. No surefire NBA superstars like Davis, Cousins, Wall, Etc. Just mediocre 1 yr college players. Plus Zion will break their faces.
I don't think players aren't developed at Duke. I think the emphasis is just different than at UK. Personally I wish Duke really did focus on D. Would mean a lot fewer burn outs.

Yeah, UK guys are better represented in the NBA, but that has little to do with UK. Cal targets athletes, K targets skill. Skill guys can't develop athleticism, so they'll never excel in today's NBA. Some athletes can develop skill. The ones who do turn into superstars, like Davis and Towns. Tyus Jones or Okafor were never going to be superstars, even if they had gone to UK.
 

Newcattitudes

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2005
2,301
1,976
0
Cam is a special talent. With that said I love our signees. Everyone of them can score at the next level. We might even see a couple of them play two years.
 

stoneycat_20

All-Conference
Nov 28, 2003
24,212
4,344
0
Come on, go back and look at the threads on this board during the first rounds of the tourney, he was the greatest thing since sliced bread.
I was one of those guys... I still think he's best in class...Can do it all......would take him over Barrett in any day
 

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,170
0
Im not sure Carter goes. I really dont think he will be a lottery pick, and if thats the case rat face will get him to stay another year. Look at Allen, he was projected 1st round a couple years ago, and he is now a senior jumping up and down singing Kaskade. I mean is singing Need you by my Side really better than making a million a year in the NBA? Lets face it, none of these kids give a damn about a degree 99 percent of them will never use. So, Humphries leaves to go get paid and I cant blame him. Rat face likes to use the 1 and Done when its convenient for him.

Oh please. Only in Duke land do these types of players come back. What's Allen got to do with it? He's not remotely close to these types of OAD's.

Duke fans thought Jones might return. They thought Rivers might return. They thought Irving probably would return. And on and on and on.

You don't seem to understand that K cannot hold these guys up if they want to land them. He sold out to the OAD.

Carter is gone.
Duval is gone.
Trent is gone.
Bagley is gone now.

Can you give me one recruit since K has thrown his hat into the guaranteed OAD arena that has returned? I'll answer that for you, no, you can't. Only guys like Jefferson and Bolden who no one really thought were OAD's to begin with.

Sleep easy on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dckala2_rivals16641

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,170
0
They are simply doing what Cal did when he first set foot at UK. Sign up the best of the best and send them off to the pros after a season and then sign the best of the best again.
It works if you actually do sign the best of the best. But when you don't sign the mega stars of the class you will not be as good but a lot of those guys will still declare after their freshmen year.

If Coach K has a mass defection of guys to the NBA he will sign more talented guys in their place. Would not surprise me in the least if Zion went to Duke as well and Duke get commitments from a couple other talented guys.

I actually expressed my fear of this years ago. Duke is getting a Nike push right now, the NCAA is going to be pushing Duke, and it's all about money and K's going out party. They are hot right now solely due to that. They could easily sign more and have a crazy run over the next 2 years. These things are contagious as we've already seen.
 

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,170
0
I don't think players aren't developed at Duke. I think the emphasis is just different than at UK. Personally I wish Duke really did focus on D. Would mean a lot fewer burn outs.

Yeah, UK guys are better represented in the NBA, but that has little to do with UK. Cal targets athletes, K targets skill. Skill guys can't develop athleticism, so they'll never excel in today's NBA. Some athletes can develop skill. The ones who do turn into superstars, like Davis and Towns. Tyus Jones or Okafor were never going to be superstars, even if they had gone to UK.

Oh give me a f'n break. Every Duke fan, and that includes espn and college basketball analyst, thought Okafor wasn't only a sure fire NBA stud, but that he was clearly the best player in the class. They promoted him for the entire year.

And once again, Cals big is the one who became the star.

Cal has the record of revolutionary change for the better with OAD's, and the ammo of their future to back it up. The only reason you're seeing a few at the top go to Duke, is because of Nike. I have absolutely no doubt. Duke was actually seen as hostile to that group, and K just suddenly turns on a light switch and lands Cousins and Wall, and does it over the creator of the system that is their perfect match?

Lol. In your world maybe.

Thank Nike and the NCAA for pushing these guys toward Duke and giving you momentum. It will swing right back once Duke loses its program, the day K retires. You've got a small window.
 

*Bleedingblue*

Heisman
Mar 5, 2009
40,842
32,755
113
I don't think players aren't developed at Duke. I think the emphasis is just different than at UK. Personally I wish Duke really did focus on D. Would mean a lot fewer burn outs.

Yeah, UK guys are better represented in the NBA, but that has little to do with UK. Cal targets athletes, K targets skill. Skill guys can't develop athleticism, so they'll never excel in today's NBA. Some athletes can develop skill. The ones who do turn into superstars, like Davis and Towns. Tyus Jones or Okafor were never going to be superstars, even if they had gone to UK.



Mmm you think that Cousins, Murray, Booker, Ulis etc etc are all just a bunch of freak athletes huh, with very little skill?
 

kylv

Sophomore
Nov 1, 2017
188
195
0
Oh please. Only in Duke land do these types of players come back. What's Allen got to do with it? He's not remotely close to these types of OAD's.

Duke fans thought Jones might return. They thought Rivers might return. They thought Irving probably would return. And on and on and on.

You don't seem to understand that K cannot hold these guys up if they want to land them. He sold out to the OAD.

Carter is gone.
Duval is gone.
Trent is gone.
Bagley is gone now.

Can you give me one recruit since K has thrown his hat into the guaranteed OAD arena that has returned? I'll answer that for you, no, you can't. Only guys like Jefferson and Bolden who no one really thought were OAD's to begin with.

Sleep easy on that.

Missing the point. Was Allen not a projected 1st rounder 2 years ago??? YES HE WAS. Why stay unless someone convinces you to. You dont think he pushed out Frank Jackson cause he had to sell playing time to Duval and Trent?
My argument is this.. I dont think Carter is a sure fire lottery pick. To many bigs better than him. Having said that, if Duke is lacking front court men next year, he will push for Carter to stay. There is only 1 coach who means what he says by PLAYERS FIRST, and that is coach Cal. Allen could of been a 1st rd pick, MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT.. and hes a senior at Duke. If he was at Kentucky, Cal sacrifices WINS for getting his guys paid at the next level. We see where Carter is projected at the end of the year. And if Duke needs front court players, Coach K will want him to stay. That is my argument, dont get it twisted big boy
 

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,170
0
Missing the point. Was Allen not a projected 1st rounder 2 years ago??? YES HE WAS. Why stay unless someone convinces you to. You dont think he pushed out Frank Jackson cause he had to sell playing time to Duval and Trent?
My argument is this.. I dont think Carter is a sure fire lottery pick. To many bigs better than him. Having said that, if Duke is lacking front court men next year, he will push for Carter to stay. There is only 1 coach who means what he says by PLAYERS FIRST, and that is coach Cal. Allen could of been a 1st rd pick, MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT.. and hes a senior at Duke. If he was at Kentucky, Cal sacrifices WINS for getting his guys paid at the next level. We see where Carter is projected at the end of the year. And if Duke needs front court players, Coach K will want him to stay. That is my argument, dont get it twisted big boy

Come at me bro.

YOU are missing the point. Rat will try and keep the mice in the nest. But with these types of recruits, he can't do it.

Allen is NOT one of those players. I don't care where he was positioned, he was never thought to be a 9 month guy at Duke, and that's what we're talking about.

Carter is gone, Trent is gone, Duval is gone, Bagley was gone last year.

All believed to be a OAD.

He will surely try and quietly keep guys and hold some guys back, but if he tries that with those four, he's going to slow his recruiting down himself. I just don't see it bro.
 

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,631
33,917
113
And you know this how?

Because I'm smart and I pay attention to what recruiting gurus and insiders have to say.... also this talk about a staff shake up because of recruiting wouldnt be happening if we felt really good about landing a top 5 player..........
 

kylv

Sophomore
Nov 1, 2017
188
195
0
Allen was a projected 1st round guy two years ago. If you dont think he was encouraged to "stay" and develop for the sole purpose of making sure Duke stays competitive you are on crack. Allen at UK would be in the NBA getting paid. Carter should be one and done, IM SAYING IF COACH K NEEDS A FRONT COURT PLAYERS FOR NEXT YEAR AND CARTER ISNT PROJECTED LOTTERY HE WILL BE ENCOURAGED TO STAY AND "DEVELOP". Thats all I am saying. There is only ONE real players coach in the NCAA and sure as hell is not coach K.

dont think for a second if Duke needed a PG Frank Jackson would still be at Duke this year.
 
Dec 12, 2007
68,157
14,860
0
Because I'm smart and I pay attention to what recruiting gurus and insiders have to say.... also this talk about a staff shake up because of recruiting wouldnt be happening if we felt really good about landing a top 5 player..........

Gurus and insiders get things wrong on the reg. Reason I asked is because if someone has legit inside information, I'd like to hear it. But going off those who sometimes have good info and sometimes are guessing like the rest of us, and stating something categorically as if they do actually KNOW, is pointless and misleading. I don't care how much people want to guess and state their opinion. I just want to know that is what it is. People on both sides of these decisions can both state definitively that they know what a recruit is going to do, but one will be wrong. But of course there is no consequence to it, so why not, right?
 

UKserialkiller

Heisman
Dec 13, 2009
34,297
54,801
0
I don't think players aren't developed at Duke. I think the emphasis is just different than at UK. Personally I wish Duke really did focus on D. Would mean a lot fewer burn outs.

Yeah, UK guys are better represented in the NBA, but that has little to do with UK. Cal targets athletes, K targets skill. Skill guys can't develop athleticism, so they'll never excel in today's NBA. Some athletes can develop skill. The ones who do turn into superstars, like Davis and Towns. Tyus Jones or Okafor were never going to be superstars, even if they had gone to UK.

hahaha
 

Catzman

Heisman
Apr 29, 2002
17,076
13,657
113
Thank god Barrett never committed or this board would have had a meltdown over this.
 

Bobcat94_rivals

All-Conference
Feb 15, 2010
2,450
3,432
0
When have you ever looked at this list and See Vanderbilt with 2 prospects rated higher than our highest commit lol. That is strange for sure.
 

kyups01

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2007
18,170
3,085
0
He is rank 1 player now, through Barrett was better .
What i cant seem to firgure out is how Keldon johnson is at #15. After his team USA stuff they said he was more than likely a sure fire top 10? I dont get it...I guess him not exploding for any huge games this season played a role in it?
 
Dec 4, 2015
54
47
0
We're not getting Zion............... If you listen to Matt Jones and get your hopes up.... well ROTFLMAO @ you then.

Did Darth Maul tell you this when you met with him on the balcony and discussed the Sith plans for taking over the galaxy? Yeah, laugh at folks when you offer nothing substantial yourself. That's awesome.
 

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,631
33,917
113
Did Darth Maul tell you this when you met with him on the balcony and discussed the Sith plans for taking over the galaxy? Yeah, laugh at folks when you offer nothing substantial yourself. That's awesome.

Put your money where your mouth is. 100$ bet that Zion doesnt end up at UK. You game or are you all mouth?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mrbud
Dec 4, 2015
54
47
0
Put your money where your mouth is. 100$ bet that Zion doesnt end up at UK. You game or are you all mouth?

I'll bet my posting rights for six months if the school of your choice is chosen over Kentucky. You still haven't predicted a school for Zion, just a "I'll bet the field" over Kentucky theme.

So yeah, I'm willing to stake my posting rights for 6 months. If I win, I'll only require you to stop posting for a week. Kind of lopsided, but I'm game.

That said, you're the one who still hasn't made a school prediction for Zion. Where do you think he'll go? Start with that, and we can actually have a discussion. Betting the field against Kentucky is absurd as far as bets go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mrbud

LineSkiCat14

Heisman
Aug 5, 2015
38,837
60,860
113
Coach K will definitely try and return someone. Will it work, I doubt it.. but you never know. I think all their freshman are playing well enough to warrnt leaving.

And as usual, their recruiting is kind of concentrated. They have two 6'7" wings next year, who are super elite scorers and offensive players.. but can they co-exist? And what about their front court? What about leadership with Allen gone?

I can't see Zion going to the same school as Reddish and RJ. That would make no sense unless K is doing something nefarious. Zion has nothing to gain (aside from a possible title with those 3) by going to a school where he'll rarely see the ball.
 

mrbud

Senior
Jun 12, 2009
1,487
498
0
Cam and. Barlett are overrated , our class is lot better ,Johnson better then both . no inside information looks like zion ship has sailed. We will be ok without zion, most our bigs will be back.
 

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,631
33,917
113
I'll bet my posting rights for six months if the school of your choice is chosen over Kentucky. You still haven't predicted a school for Zion, just a "I'll bet the field" over Kentucky theme.

So yeah, I'm willing to stake my posting rights for 6 months. If I win, I'll only require you to stop posting for a week. Kind of lopsided, but I'm game.

That said, you're the one who still hasn't made a school prediction for Zion. Where do you think he'll go? Start with that, and we can actually have a discussion. Betting the field against Kentucky is absurd as far as bets go.

Posting rights? You think I'm an idiot? either this is a 2nd account of yours or you dont post much anyways by your extremely low post count. 54 posts in two years.... yeah this bet would really be fair..... you're missing out on 14 posts and I'd be missing out on hundreds.

He'll pick Clemson........ just come back and post an apology to me when when it happens
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cindog28

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
I don't think players aren't developed at Duke. I think the emphasis is just different than at UK. Personally I wish Duke really did focus on D. Would mean a lot fewer burn outs.

Yeah, UK guys are better represented in the NBA, but that has little to do with UK. Cal targets athletes, K targets skill. Skill guys can't develop athleticism, so they'll never excel in today's NBA. Some athletes can develop skill. The ones who do turn into superstars, like Davis and Towns. Tyus Jones or Okafor were never going to be superstars, even if they had gone to UK.

Few comments.

1. K is underrated as a defensive coach. His system requires multiple years to learn, though. Also, he is use to having a couple of Matt Jones and Amile Jefferson type players to offset the Allen type players that can't guard fence post. So, add offensive minded Freshmen who don't have time to learn the defensive system to an offensive minded Senior who just doesn't have the skill to play effective defense at this level, and you have a poor defensive team. By March, they will be better, but how much better is the question.

2. Have to disagree about Okafor, to a certain extent. I think under Cal (and more importantly Payne) he would have been better. Now, his attitude is part of the problem, but that's probably one reason why he chose Duke over UK. Lack of a work ethic. Physically, Okafor had everything working in his favor. If he was better between the ears, he would already be an All-Star, IMHO.
 

yoshukai

Heisman
Dec 21, 2002
29,649
41,901
102
I actually expressed my fear of this years ago. Duke is getting a Nike push right now, the NCAA is going to be pushing Duke, and it's all about money and K's going out party. They are hot right now solely due to that. They could easily sign more and have a crazy run over the next 2 years. These things are contagious as we've already seen.
In the back of my mind I was wondering if Dukes "Nike Push" had something to do with Cal not playing in the Phil Knight tournament.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morgousky

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
Duke is going to be extremely young next season. No Seniors. A couple of Juniors who aren't that good. A few 3 to 4-star Sophs, plus Barrett, Reddish, and Jones. If K cries hard enough, maybe Trent comes back, but he probably leaves as well with those three at the 1-3 spots he would be pushed to the 4. They probably get Bacot to reclass.

Most likely they will look like this:

G Jones
G Reddish
G Barrett
F DeLaurier or Bacot
F Bolden

Bench: Tucker, Goldwire, O'Connell, White, DeLaurier or Bacot.

Great guards, but weak inside. Very, very young. Barrett and Reddish will get what they want- all the shots.
 

BlueBlood66_rivals34314

All-Conference
Aug 2, 2012
3,469
1,233
0
Duke is going to be extremely young next season. No Seniors. A couple of Juniors who aren't that good. A few 3 to 4-star Sophs, plus Barrett, Reddish, and Jones. If K cries hard enough, maybe Trent comes back, but he probably leaves as well with those three at the 1-3 spots he would be pushed to the 4. They probably get Bacot to reclass.

Most likely they will look like this:

G Jones
G Reddish
G Barrett
F DeLaurier or Bacot
F Bolden

Bench: Tucker, Goldwire, O'Connell, White, DeLaurier or Bacot.

Great guards, but weak inside. Very, very young. Barrett and Reddish will get what they want- all the shots.

You forgot Zion..... I kid I kid
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
You forgot Zion..... I kid I kid

LOL!

You never know. Never put anything past K, the way he has been recruiting.

Williamson slides into the 4 spot, of course. They become deadly on offense, but still so young. Williamson definitely fills the hole in the middle of the offense.

I don't see you guys winning the title with that team, though. Just not enough experience for a Coach K team.
 

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,631
33,917
113
Duke is extremely young this year........ and they are only 7 deep. those two factors arent going to hinder a great coach like K.... Lets just admit that we have to hope for chemistry problems for Duke to not be really good.... I mean last year....... the year with rivers....... chemistry problems is known to happen there... so lets hope