Lol you are challenged if you look at that draw and say hell yea. The fact is, not only does UK never get a decently favorable draw, it's that even if it isn't the toughest path of the four, you bet your *** it's the second toughest. And also bet your *** that the matchups will usually be in our opponents favor......"Just so happens"
Por ejemplo - Kentucky probably has the hardest or second hardest path. Let's give it, it's the second hardest. Now look at the matchups.
Arizona - best player in the country. Just so happens, he's a big, where we have issues.
Virginia as the 1. - half court sound team who doesn't make many mistakes and plays great defense. The exact opposite of a good draw for UK. I said from day one and will stick to it, the two teams we did not need to see, we got. Ayton and Virginia, bad matchups.
Cal is trying to explain to the mentally slow that the ncaa is not a fan and the selection committee intentionally makes it tough on him. How many examples do you need? They give us final four games in the sweet 16 when we have guys like Anthony Davis and lock up a top overall seed. If we don't outright take a one seed they always seem to have us 2-3 seeds too low, like clockwork, and the media who doesn't care for UK will usually admit it.
Some people really don't understand the politics behind college basketball. They deny college basketball analyst are anti-UK, when it's a clear fact. They think the NCAA has nothing against Cal, when they do.
Look at the beneficiary of the theory. UNC and Duke? See any favoritism and selective enforcement? When the sports msmedia hides these issues because they all come from those schools, doesn't it make your brain work?
Wake the hell up if you are having trouble catching on, it's annoying talking to someone so clueless with opinions.
