Doesn't an AD have to leave the room while the committee is discussing his school?
Mitch does have to leave room but he has done nothing to help us with the opponents.
You don't actually know what he did or tried to do. He's just an easy target for you and others.Mitch does have to leave room but he has done nothing to help us with the opponents.
And you know this how?Sure Mitch has to "recuse" himself when the actual vote on UK is done. But the backroom deals, under the table "agreements" with others on the committee is where the real seeding occurs. And Mitch doesn't strike me as a backroom dealer. More of a go-by-the-rules guy. Which is fine. But when others are playing the "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" game, UK gets well, what we've been getting.
Results, man results. Not just this year, either. And the corruption that is the NCAA. And human nature: take care of our own. And, well, it goes on and on. You naive to think that pUKe and uncheat's draws and seeds happen by accident? By honest interaction on the part of committee members? If you believe that, I've got some beachfront property in BOISE, IDAHO I'd like to sell you. Or DESMOINES, IOWA.And you know this how?
They must have left him out in the hall when the other 67 teams were discussed.Doesn't an AD have to leave the room while the committee is discussing his school?
How does anyone know that? Not one single person bitching about MB on this board knows anything about what goes on with MB but there's a lot that have answers. HahaMitch does have to leave room but he has done nothing to help us with the opponents.
How does anyone know that? Not one single person bitching about MB on this board knows anything about what goes on with MB but there a lot that have answers. Haha
That's one of those things where people ***** but don't think how bad it could of been because they don't see what's actually been done.
All this is silly speculation. We don't know what impact Mitch has, if any. Without him maybe we get a 6 seed. Maybe he did a ton for us and we still got screwed? Maybe he made a lot of backroom deals and they all bailed on them? What's he supposed to do? Call them out publicly for not helping his team? That would make us look bad and label us as cheaters in the eyes of many. We can play the maybe game all day, but we don't know. Mitch has some black marks on his record but this really isn't one we can definitively add to that list.
Yeah he as to leave the room when UK is discussed. But he also comes back into the room, at which point he should start flipping tables over. This isn't the first time this crap has happened.
Then he comes back in and chuckles about how they "punked us again".I bet when he leaves the room that all other people start making fun of him.
Mitch just doesn't have the personality or the strength to inspire, intimidate, or lead. Sure, he leaves the room when Kentucky is discussed. But before he leaves the room he needs to make it clear that he would consider it a personal affront, with consequences, if the Cats get reamed yet again. And when he comes back he needs to say, "Hold it fellas. I let this go in 2011 and 2014 and 2015 and 2016 and last year when we drew a wildly mis-seeded Wichita State in the round of 32 and the most productive offense in the country and a team that beat us at home in the round of 16 and the toughest team in the country in the round of 8. But it's time Kentucky got some consideration. Here is what I want."
Instead, I picture him sitting there with that goofy grin, desperate to be liked and treated like one of the guys, so he lets it all go down in a way that paints him as a clown.
This is so ridiculous.
Why do people not get that any person on the committee associated with a school is not allowed to even discuss their school? He's not in the room when UK is discussed and there is no point where he is even allowed to bring UK up.
Why is this so hard to understand?