In considering more of the line play, yes there were what seemed like Robb Smith era leave your area D (inexplicable both tackles stunting leaving middle wide open see td run) that made things worse, but the difference in physicality is still shocking. It would appear they had more stout lines on both sides.
Further re coaching, with all the pre season platitudes and last two years of improving OL performance, this is shocking. Coaching certainly didn''t help.
But seeing Needham consistently beat and out athleticism'd (new word?) as well as Asamoah...and the rest-wow. That the OL was manhandled was a shock. Were they just thinking too much with new schemes or are they really athletically inferior to Umass?
And speaking of the eye test, appears all of the lower level players were not at least for game one able to make the jump. LBs seemed small, slow and passive. Secondary was small and beat off the ball.
When Umass had the 4th quarter pick it was an athletic play and what hit me was I don't see anyone in the RU secondary who could make such a play. Umass has a more athletic secondary--was there a total miss on talent evaluation? Hopefully not but you can't determine the opposite from game one.