BOOM - Jerone Morton

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,974
4,758
113
For the love of god you are so clueless you hsve brought up AD stats in everything with elite scoring
If you are not just trolling with this you are displaying an astonishing inability to comprehend a simple point. I'll try in good faith once again. What is your definition of an elite scorer? Do you contend we need elite scorers or not?
 

The Ganner

Senior
Nov 21, 2009
265
707
93
Agreed. Had we landed a couple studs earlier, people would be more happy about this. This guy would be the perfect piece that you wind down with to round out the roster. The timing of when you get certain dudes can change perception

If you were talking about McBride this would make sense. I see no scenario where anyone should be excited about Morton. He wasn't even a good mid major player. He was a minor rotation player on a terrible mid major team. He's an 11-12th man, practice player and emergency piece level guy. Easily replaceable by 100 other guys.
 
Last edited:

Artlaibesghost

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2022
1,056
2,088
113
Besides Wilkins, we've got no one on the wing who can score. Hawthorne was redshirted for a reason last year. Williams is one-dimensional. He has no slashing game to speak of. That's a huge issue.

You're usually a pretty reasonable poster. I'm surprised that you like this roster without the necessary second wing scorer.

This team will be lucky to finish top 5 in the SEC, and there's no way they're winning the SEC. Isn't that the point of fielding a team at Kentucky? I guess some of our fans are okay with "meh" these days now that the standard has been lowered significantly.

The guy has 4 open schoolers left let's wait till he's finished before we declare this team DOA.
 

MidseasonTweak

Heisman
Mar 1, 2020
9,940
16,606
113
If you were talking about McBride this would make sense. I see no scenario where anyone sshould be excited about Morton. He wasn't even a good mid major player. He was a minor rotation player on a terrible mid major team. He's an 11-12th man, practice player and emergency piece level guy. Easily replaceable by 100 other guys.
Well, we're going to need him. I hope we see a surprise from him
 

AJBlue

Senior
Dec 16, 2015
251
433
63
Just need another backup big and we're done.

Contrary to a lot of angsty fans, I actually really like the roster we have so far. I think we have defined starters and backups who will know their roles.

We have more shooting than last year and more athleticism than Pope's first year. We have PG depth (legit 3.5-strong). I do think we can approach 30 wins with this roster. That's still far from the standard, but this is a genuinely good group of guys we've got so far.

Boom.
I actually do too. Athletically and skill wise I think we definitely upgraded from last year. I think people are way undervaluing B Hawthorne and Kam next year. Both are set up to break out, especially Kam. And Ndyie kid is really skilled too.

As I’ve said before I just worry about our physicality because what we’ve gained in skill it came in thin packages and today’s game has turned into a bruising mele aromas the basket. McBride may help there but need inte more big body down low.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JPFisher

PopesCrewCut

Sophomore
Apr 25, 2026
159
170
43
You’re trash to this board
derp GIF by FirstAndMonday

So is your mom
 

Cats_2010

Heisman
Jan 8, 2010
11,803
20,081
103
I respectfully, wholeheartedly disagree.



Diallo started 29 of 33 this year.

Wilkins started for all of Furman's 35 games.

Kam became a starter after a shaky first half of the season and was doing well in that role before injury.

Ousmane was probably the starting PF on his team. Dunno. Euro ball stats still annoy the piss out of me.

Malachi was last year's starter at C.

Justin McBride started 30 of 31 games played last year.

Jerone Morton started 29 of 32 games played.

This argument should've been taken more seriously last year with Aberdeen, Chandler, Garrison, MoD, Jelly, and others. That said, this roster is already full of starters. We don't have to hope these guys are cool with being "the guy." They've largely been tasked with the starting gig before.
There’s a pretty big difference in being the 6th man on an SEC team (like Aberdeen and Mo were) and being a starter at places like Furman and James Madison. Hard to believe you really think like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueBloodKyFan72

JPFisher

Heisman
Jul 24, 2013
6,775
13,080
113
I actually do too. Athletically and skill wise I think we definitely upgraded from last year. I think people are way undervaluing B Hawthorne and Kam next year. Both are set up to break out, especially Kam. And Ndyie kid is really skilled too.

As I’ve said before I just worry about our physicality because what we’ve gained in skill it came in thin packages and today’s game has turned into a bruising mele aromas the basket. McBride may help there but need inte more big body down low.
Physicality is one of my concerns too. We have a physical guard in Diallo and that's about it. McBride has some toughness, but I need some of these guys to step up as killers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MichaelGray

MichaelGray

All-Conference
Jan 13, 2026
951
1,357
93
Brea was being recruited by Duke and UConn, among others, so he was certainly on the NBA radar. A 6'7" guy who shoots ~50% from 3 will always be on the NBA radar. Robinson, I'm with you, and Amari -- I have no idea, but given he was known for defense and passing, I'd imagine he was on the radar. Not sure on him though.

Oweh was not on the radar and still isn't.

Any GM who has Kam on their radar is an idiot. If he shot ~45% from 3, then I could see it. Sinking to 35% when going from Tulane to an actual school just tells me he's not an elite player. Brea, join the other hand, put up ~43% in a crazy good SEC.

Last time I checked, Brea and Williams combined to get like ~5 min/game in the league. But still legit NBA-ers.

You're in for a rude awakening if you expect anything like Year 1 from this team. Just letting you know now.
We shall see. I never said I expect it, I said the current roster has things year 1 didn't have.
 

MichaelGray

All-Conference
Jan 13, 2026
951
1,357
93
Pope is all but guaranteed to be coaching our team this upcoming season. Many of you wanted him fired and it didn't happen so now it's time to accept that and get behind hoping he succeeds this year. If things don't go much better he may well be gone next year. I have said many times on here now if that is how it plays out I won't be whining like so many constantly do now. I will get on board with backing our next coach. I'm not so much attached to Pope as I am to backing whoever our coach is but I don't think a revolving door situation is something we want to get into barring extreme circumstances.
I just don't want Kansas to pass us in wins, I want Kentucky to win every game, some fans want him to lose & get fired, I don't see how any true Kentucky fan could ever root for them to lose.
 

AJG-15

All-Conference
Apr 8, 2024
1,972
3,416
78
Márcio Henrique da Costa Santos is a brazilian born 23 years old that will be 24 in November. That‘s important to know because of the potential new ncaa eligibility rule. Uk will need to get him cleared asap.

he played professional basketball for 8 years(6 in Brazil , one in Germany and one Israel). It will be easier for him to adjust to life in USA, ncaa and sec basketball because he already moved twice away from his culture.

he is not going to be rattled by the away atmosphere in sec, which it feel like a walk in the park vs the atmosphere in eurolegue or Israel.

he went tried for nba in 2023 , went undrafted and played 5 games for summer for the hawks.

baskeball wise, at 6’8 he is rather undersized for center , but has decent athletic abilities. Skills wise he has a little but of everything, can pass, shoot some, decent footwork in the paint, and decent rebounding and blocking shots.
At this point , he is a more rounded player because of experience than MM .

here some video s from brazil time:




from Germany where the team played a lot of zoom action, which probably caught MP eye.



from Maccabi in Israel:



he is better that Jela and he will integrate better in Pope offense . A little undersized but decent athletic abilities. i am hoping he can be a poor man Broome provided to Auburn or Boozer for Duke on MP offense.
 

kenjiwing

Sophomore
Feb 2, 2010
55
175
33
I just don't want Kansas to pass us in wins, I want Kentucky to win every game, some fans want him to lose & get fired, I don't see how any true Kentucky fan could ever root for them to lose.
We have lost the wins record before.. this really isnt as big of a deal as you think it is.
 
Apr 18, 2026
346
476
63
If you are not just trolling with this you are displaying an astonishing inability to comprehend a simple point. I'll try in good faith once again. What is your definition of an elite scorer? Do you contend we need elite scorers or not?
Promise I'm not trolling you. So for ELITE from what I see right now, we don't have that player who can go get his every day/night. We don't have that player, when you ask yourself who would you want to take the last shot to win the game. Scoring at a high clip but being efficient, player that can score it at all 3 levels.
If you are not just trolling with this you are displaying an astonishing inability to comprehend a simple point. I'll try in good faith once again. What is your definition of an elite scorer? Do you contend we need elite scorers or not?
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
41,799
63,708
113
The cool thing is I said "approach" 30 wins. That's 27 in my book.

I don't know what fans really want from Kam. He was great last year when he got it going but a ton of fans are talking like he has to make some huge jump or he'll be unplayable. I think Hawthorne will surprise some people, too. He's highly skilled, long, and really just needed some muscle on that frame from a year in a college program.

I've read several places from overseas analysts and coaches that UK got a steal in Ousmane and that he will probably be in the draft next year. I don't recall hearing anything like that about Jelavic, MoD, or Garrison last year.

I'm not trolling. I'm dead serious. Go ahead and bookmark my comment. In a year, if anything of this **** hole site still exists, you can call me out and I'll eat crow.

People shoot crap at their a$$es on these board all the time. The perpetually depressed cannot be objective. It would be great to have a basketball conversation without the redundant trolling.

Let’s try.

The assumed starters on this team will still be relatively young, except for Diallo. Here is best case scenario:

PG - Diallo works his butt off knowing this may be his last year and he wants it to be his best. He is a very good PG. If he has his best year, we will all be happy.

SG - Wilkins does not have a soph slump and takes a leap. If that happens, he will be on NBA radars.

WF- Kam seemed to be getting it together when he got hurt last season. He has SEC experience now. He was dubbed an NBA prospect this time last season. If he puts what he learned into getting better, he could be seen as a second round prospect.

WF - B Hawthorne. If last year’s class was not so freaking talented, Hawthorne would have been a McDee. Seeing guys like Allen at Santa Clara wisely take a RS to build and improve gives me hope that Hawthorne will be the surprise of this team.

PF - McBride and NDiaye. NDiaye could be a real thrill ride or a frustrating matador. These guys together probably give us a combined solid 4. Probably overall better than last year at the spot. Santos could possibly play here, as well, if he signs.

C - Moreno needs to improve his game and his body. If he does that, he could be a first round NBA draft pick next season. Perhaps lottery pick.
 

wildcat111

All-Conference
Dec 9, 2020
1,562
1,759
113
Besides Wilkins, we've got no one on the wing who can score. Hawthorne was redshirted for a reason last year. Williams is one-dimensional. He has no slashing game to speak of. That's a huge issue.

You're usually a pretty reasonable poster. I'm surprised that you like this roster without the necessary second wing scorer.

This team will be lucky to finish top 5 in the SEC, and there's no way they're winning the SEC. Isn't that the point of fielding a team at Kentucky? I guess some of our fans are okay with "meh" these days now that the standard has been lowered significantly.
Sounds just like last season.....and we all know how that ended....PATHETIC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cornbreadnmilk

TFCat11

Heisman
Mar 25, 2019
6,137
11,174
108
The cool thing is I said "approach" 30 wins. That's 27 in my book.

I don't know what fans really want from Kam. He was great last year when he got it going but a ton of fans are talking like he has to make some huge jump or he'll be unplayable. I think Hawthorne will surprise some people, too. He's highly skilled, long, and really just needed some muscle on that frame from a year in a college program.

I've read several places from overseas analysts and coaches that UK got a steal in Ousmane and that he will probably be in the draft next year. I don't recall hearing anything like that about Jelavic, MoD, or Garrison last year.

I'm not trolling. I'm dead serious. Go ahead and bookmark my comment. In a year, if anything of this **** hole site still exists, you can call me out and I'll eat crow.
27 wins? So with Pope’s least talented roster, going back to his 1st season at BYU, he’s going to get to 27, with a loaded SEC, and 5-6 other non conference games that’s almost guaranteed losses, when the guy has only won 25 games once (Covid year) in his entire career, going back before BYU?

Micro-dosing is your friend! You just can’t go wading into 3-5 grams of the stuff, likes it’s candy, crazy stuff might start ending up being posted here👍🏼
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,974
4,758
113
Promise I'm not trolling you. So for ELITE from what I see right now, we don't have that player who can go get his every day/night. We don't have that player, when you ask yourself who would you want to take the last shot to win the game. Scoring at a high clip but being efficient, player that can score it at all 3 levels.
So you are insisting that scoring average is not indicative of anything and this must be determined by subjective measure based on total opinion? If objective facts or numbers are not to be considered then any logical conclusion to this debate is not really possible. I can advocate for the abilities of current players but you have obviously made up your mind they aren't good enough and nothing I say will change that so why bother?

Can you at least finally concede the logic that based on scoring average the 2012 team is proof that you do not truly need multiple elite scorers (which was the claim that started all of this) to compete at a high level? The 2012 team averaged 77.4 ppg. Do you honestly believe this upcoming team does not have a legitimate chance to even be near that number? The last two seasons have been 84.4 and 80.5.

What truly set the 2012 team apart was the defense holding opponents to 60.6 ppg. If you were arguing that we have little chance of matching that or even getting anywhere near that I would have no argument. That was never what this discussion was about however. It has all been about the singular claim that you must have multiple elite scorers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Cole World

BlueVelvetFog

Heisman
Apr 12, 2016
14,282
19,763
78
Wrong. It's a very big deal.
I don't get the big deal with keeping an all time wins record. Winning Percentages is what the records books promote...and UK is solid there. I mean I guess St Augustus Gloop college could have started playing basketball in 1518, and cleaned a ton of clocks to hold the all time wins record and lost a bunch to be at .485
 
Apr 18, 2026
346
476
63
So you are insisting that scoring average is not indicative of anything and this must be determined by subjective measure based on total opinion? If objective facts or numbers are not to be considered then any logical conclusion to this debate is not really possible. I can advocate for the abilities of current players but you have obviously made up your mind they aren't good enough and nothing I say will change that so why bother?

Can you at least finally concede the logic that based on scoring average the 2012 team is proof that you do not truly need multiple elite scorers (which was the claim that started all of this) to compete at a high level? The 2012 team averaged 77.4 ppg. Do you honestly believe this upcoming team does not have a legitimate chance to even be near that number? The last two seasons have been 84.4 and 80.5.

What truly set the 2012 team apart was the defense holding opponents to 60.6 ppg. If you were arguing that we have little chance of matching that or even getting anywhere near that I would have no argument. That was never what this discussion was about however. It has all been about the singular claim that you must have multiple elite scorers.
The 2012 team had it all they didn’t need ELITE scoring they had it all agree defense was SUPERIOR. You comparing any of these players against AD, MJG, Lamb, jones, Teague and Miller would get smoked by 25 plus on a bad night. You’re not even comparing the same thing. Just compare the greatest Bulls Team to the worse Bulls team.
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,974
4,758
113
The 2012 team had it all they didn’t need ELITE scoring they had it all agree defense was SUPERIOR. You comparing any of these players against AD, MJG, Lamb, jones, Teague and Miller would get smoked by 25 plus on a bad night. You’re not even comparing the same thing. Just compare the greatest Bulls Team to the worse Bulls team.
I have never compared these players to those players in any way. That is total delusion on your part. At least you finally admitted that you do not indeed need multiple elite scorers to compete at a high level. That was after all my entire point and you just conceded it even though you didn't seem to realize it. Trying to invoke the Bull's is just foolish nonsense on your part. Are you going to argue that Jordan did not qualify as an elite scorer?
 
Last edited:
Apr 18, 2026
346
476
63
I have never compared these players to those players in any way. That is total delusion on your part. At least you finally admitted that you do not indeed need multiple elite scorers to compete at a high level. That was after all my entire point and you just conceded it even though you didn't seem to realize it. Trying to invoke the Bull's is just foolish nonsense on your part.
You are comparing the 2012 NCAA champion team against this team. You did bring up AD and elite is anyone who can get their anytime the starting 5 again would hammer this team.

you are comparing a fourth degree burn 2012 team to a little blister to next years team
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,974
4,758
113
You are comparing the 2012 NCAA champion team against this team. You did bring up AD and elite is anyone who can get their anytime the starting 5 again would hammer this team.

you are comparing a fourth degree burn 2012 team to a little blister to next years team
I never compared them. The claim was made that you had to have multiple elite scorers to compete at a high level. I pointed out that was not true unless you considered 12.3-14.2 ppg elite scorers. I have spelled this out repeatedly. It should not be that difficult to understand. Can you comprehend that I had to pick a highly successful team to meet the criteria of the initial claim? That team was the most obvious that immediately came to mind.

To state this as simply as possible using the 2012 team as an example of a highly successful team that did not require elite scorers is in no way making a comparison to our upcoming team. It simply dispelled one specific claim.
 
Last edited:

Padsfs07

All-Conference
Jan 19, 2013
3,672
3,418
108
The assumed starters on this team will still be relatively young, except for Diallo. Here is best case scenario:

PG - Diallo works his butt off knowing this may be his last year and he wants it to be his best. He is a very good PG. If he has his best year, we will all be happy.

Diallo is going to be a Junior for UK. He was in the Cooper Flagg class. So he could play 2-3 years more of college basketball depending on the 5 in 5 rule change.
 
Apr 18, 2026
346
476
63
I never compared them. The claim was made that you had to have multiple elite scorers to compete at a high level. I pointed out that was not true unless you considered 11.9-14.2 ppg elite scorers. I have spelled this out repeatedly. It should not be that difficult to understand. Can you comprehend that I had to pick a highly successful team to meet the criteria of the initial claim? That team was the most obvious that immediately came to mind.

To state this as simply as possible using the 2012 team as an example of a highly successful team that did not require elite scorers is in no way making a comparison to our upcoming team. It simply dispelled one specific claim.
Elite players can get there’s ANY TIME and you did compare you are absolutely the most Narcissistic person o have ever encountered. Just remember all this when the season begins against real competition not the fluff teams
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,974
4,758
113
Elite players can get there’s ANY TIME and you did compare you are absolutely the most Narcissistic person o have ever encountered. Just remember all this when the season begins against real competition not the fluff teams
I don't think you even know what that term means. It is not my fault that a very simple point has repeatedly gone over your head for days. You guys are the one's that determined they had no elite scorers not me. I even tried to concede that they could in fact be considered elite scorers and was immediately chastised. I don't know what it is you want me to remember when the season starts as I have not actually made any claims. Whatever actually occurs this season has no bearing on the simple point that I made.

You seem to think that applying logic and trying to hold the debate to that standard equals narcissism.
 
Last edited:
Apr 18, 2026
346
476
63
I don't think you even know what that term means. It is not my fault that a very simple point has repeatedly gone over your head for days. You guys are the one's that determined they had no elite scorers not me. I even tried to concede that they could in fact be considered elite scorers and was immediately made fun of for that. I don't know what it is you want me to remember when the season starts as I have not actually made any claims. Whatever actually occurs this season has no bearing on the simple point that I made.

You seem to think that applying logic and trying to hold the debate to that standard equals narcissism.
Elite it’s a combo of skill, IQ, scoring, defense it’s the ultimate basketball player with a variety of these plus many others. Again I personally don’t see it with this team.
 
Jul 17, 2025
73
76
18
I've been asking, can anyone sell me on this kid? Among the starters on a 12-20 Washington State that finished 8th in the West Coast Conference, he had the lowest usage percentage, the lowest true shooting. The only way I'm ok with this is if he's the 3rd string point guard for when both Diallo and Wilkins are sitting (and we stagger their rests so one is on the court as much as possible). He does not seem good enough to be a major rotation player for us. We definitely need at least 1 more guard/wing and for Morton to be no higher than 6th in the rotation of 6 guys at the 1-2-3.
While I strongly prefer we land a volume three point maker to be the third guard/wing. I can probably live with Morton as the 5th after Wilkens, Diallo, Kam, and Hawthorne if it comes to it.

He'd hopefully just would pitch in about 15 mintues or so spelling the other two guards with occasional spot minutes covering foul trouble or gimpyness at the 3 even if bumps one of the others up.
He has at least sort of jeweled himself up a bit over his carrer so maybe he can take a little step again and more or less give similar deficiency in the SEC as a role guy.

I don't think anyone is pitching a star or anything here but I don't think it takes much squinting to see a solid relief guard that makes his free throws, can handle the ball solidly and doesn't stop it, and can make a couple threes for us.
 

UKfan2151

All-American
Oct 1, 2003
14,431
9,421
113
Not sure I would use the term "BOOM" to describe this committment. It is a muffled "pop" at best. This is a fella we are bringing in to occupy the 11th-15th spots on the roster. He's a guy that will get very limited clock and can hopefully knock down an open three here and there. But a significant contributer? No.
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,974
4,758
113
Elite it’s a combo of skill, IQ, scoring, defense it’s the ultimate basketball player with a variety of these plus many others. Again I personally don’t see it with this team.
Elite wasn't the term I was referring to it was narcissist. I would have thought the last sentence which I isolated for you would have made that clear enough. Are you having an emotional meltdown when you read these posts or something?
 
Apr 18, 2026
346
476
63
Elite wasn't the term I was referring to it was narcissist. I would have thought the last sentence which I isolated for you would have made that clear enough. Are you having an emotional meltdown when you read these posts or something?
Can we both agree we hope Pope needs to succeed next year with what he has signed and recruited or it’s over. I mean come on Paul any of us on this site wouldn’t miss on 30 plus recruits
 

paulcalhoun_rivals397471

All-Conference
Aug 23, 2024
1,974
4,758
113
Can we both agree we hope Pope needs to succeed next year with what he has signed and recruited or it’s over. I mean come on Paul any of us on this site wouldn’t miss on 30 plus recruits
The second sentence was not necessary to throw in there but as for the first one I am happy to agree and let things subside for now.