Big Man

Scarlet83

Heisman
Feb 4, 2004
9,541
10,700
103

Crushed it?? No. He got an intriguing player in Derkack and two needed bench players who may or may not pan out. All 3 have had success vs much less competition. Sometimes that works (Cam), and sometimes it doesn’t (Noah). Other than maybe Derkack, it doesn’t seem like there was much, if any high-level competition for these players. If it’s because of NIL, then I guess Pike’s hands are tied. Our portal class is middle of the pack B1G right now. Regardless, we’ve done ok so far, and how we use the remaining spots will go a long way in determining how we’ve done.
Absolutely. You have to look past rankings. Pike knew exactly what this years team needed. For what we needed, Pike crushed it.

All 3 of those players were TOP targets of Pike.

Each of those players is tough and gritty. Tough and gritty are not a factor in the rankings you are looking at. But it’s something really important that we lacked last year, IMO. In fact, I think you posted that during the season. And toughness is something that made us a tournament team a few years ago. Also, each of those players were relied upon HEAVILY by their team and they produced under that pressure. You are going to be surprised by Martini, Acuff and Derkack.

I am curious. Do you listen to Richie and Mike’s podcast?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,376
6,310
113
Absolutely. For what we needed, Pike crushed it. All 3 of those players were TOP targets of Pike.

I am curious. Do you listen to Richie and Mike’s podcast?

“Crushing it” might be a bit strong but i think it certainly is VERY SOLID. I have no complaints with our transfer haul so far
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roy_Faulker

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,449
16,281
113
Absolutely. You have to look past rankings. Pike knew exactly what this years team needed. For what we needed, Pike crushed it.

All 3 of those players were TOP targets of Pike.

Each of those players is tough and gritty. Tough and gritty are not a factor in the rankings you are looking at. But it’s something really important that we lacked last year, IMO. In fact, I think you posted that during the season. And toughness is something that made us a tournament team a few years ago. Also, each of those players were relied upon HEAVILY by their team and they produced under that pressure. You are going to be surprised by Martini, Acuff and Derkack.

I am curious. Do you listen to Richie and Mike’s podcast?
We disagree here but I hope you are right.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,121
12,451
78
2018-19 MJ would basically be like rollling w Sommerville and Ogbole, although MJ had the redshirt year under his belt, he had no resume? MJ and Shaq Doorson each went under 18 min each, and mixed in some Doucure, some Shaq Carter.
Huh? What are you talking about? I’m saying we would be getting the version of MJ that had ALREADY completed 2018-19. He’d have that year on his resume. We’d be getting 2019-20 MJ in that case which would be great.
Omier would be a game changer.
For sure. And he’d cost a lot, but not over a million because he’s 6-7.
 

seansherm

Heisman
Feb 20, 2009
14,050
15,001
113
Huh? What are you talking about? I’m saying we would be getting the version of MJ that had ALREADY completed 2018-19. He’d have that year on his resume. We’d be getting 2019-20 MJ in that case which would be great.

For sure. And he’d cost a lot, but not over a million because he’s 6-7.
Fair enough, I interpreted your comment as matching the 2018-2019 season version. Not sure I agree though, think we'll be going for a guy with at least two years of on court college experience. Need a veteran at the position.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,121
12,451
78
Fair enough, I interpreted your comment as matching the 2018-2019 season version. Not sure I agree though, think we'll be going for a guy with at least two years of on court college experience. Need a veteran at the position.

We’re in the off-season right now. I was talking about finding someone matching the off season resume following that season. MJ was a BIG coming off a season where he played about 18 mpg, grabbing likely 5 or so rebounds. Modest scoring. That profile (in the case of MJ translated into a productive 2019-20 campaign). We certainly wouldn’t want a 4th or 5th year player with that profile because it would likely mean they weren’t good enough to beat others out year over year. But a rising sophomore or junior who played 17-18 productive minutes wouldn’t be an “Epic failure” of a pick up.
 

seansherm

Heisman
Feb 20, 2009
14,050
15,001
113
We’re in the off-season right now. I was talking about finding someone matching the off season resume following that season. MJ was a BIG coming off a season where he played about 18 mpg, grabbing likely 5 or so rebounds. Modest scoring. That profile (in the case of MJ translated into a productive 2019-20 campaign). We certainly wouldn’t want a 4th or 5th year player with that profile because it would likely mean they weren’t good enough to beat others out year over year. But a rising sophomore or junior who played 17-18 productive minutes wouldn’t be an “Epic failure” of a pick up.
I don't care what their resume is if we get MJs 2019-2020 production out of them.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,121
12,451
78
I don't care what their resume is if we get MJs 2019-2020 production out of them.

Of course not. The point I’m making is that MJ was productive in 2018-19 despite not yet having what would’ve been a million dollar profile if NIL was around. A reasonably high percentage of guys who produced well in their first year in a back up role take the next step the following season as a starter. The key is we probably don’t want a career back up BIg (3-4 seasons worth) or a kid like Agee who produced on a team that was blown out every game (because it’s hard to separate garbage time stats from real data).
 

seansherm

Heisman
Feb 20, 2009
14,050
15,001
113
Of course not. The point I’m making is that MJ was productive in 2018-19 despite not yet having what would’ve been a million dollar profile if NIL was around. A reasonably high percentage of guys who produced well in their first year in a back up role take the next step the following season as a starter. The key is we probably don’t want a career back up BIg (3-4 seasons worth) or a kid like Agee who produced on a team that was blown out every game (because it’s hard to separate garbage time stats from real data).
Yeah, I hear what you are saying, just don't think Pike is going to take a chance going the was productive in limited minutes and hopefully takes a step route. At the end of the day it will be a guy like Charles Thompson (not him, think he's out of eligibility) from Towson that put up 9 and 8 with good defense in legit minutes in a smaller conference for a couple years.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,121
12,451
78
Yeah, I hear what you are saying, just don't think Pike is going to take a chance going the was productive in limited minutes and hopefully takes a step route. At the end of the day it will be a guy like Charles Thompson (not him, think he's out of eligibility) from Towson that put up 9 and 8 with good defense in legit minutes in a smaller conference for a couple years.

Yes, I said that at one point, didn’t I? We’ll be scouting the undersized 240+ pounders who are 6-6 / 6-7ish that put up high rebound numbers on low majors. Along with guys who played PF on major conference teams with good rebounding production (like the Miami kid). It’s either going to be that or a well performing one year back up like the version of MJ I described. Whatever we can ultimately most afford. All will be looked at. We simply do not have the money for a traditional proven starting center 6.8+. I don’t know what our budget is but I doubt we’re close. Cliff didn’t even entertain staying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83

RUSCFORMERLYRULOU

All-American
Nov 12, 2017
5,485
6,964
103
Yes, I said that at one point, didn’t I? We’ll be scouting the undersized 240+ pounders who are 6-6 / 6-7ish that put up high rebound numbers on low majors. Along with guys who played PF on major conference teams with good rebounding production (like the Miami kid). It’s either going to be that or a well performing one year back up like the version of MJ I described. Whatever we can ultimately most afford. All will be looked at. We simply do not have the money for a traditional proven starting center 6.8+. I don’t know what our budget is but I doubt we’re close. Cliff didn’t even entertain staying.
I'm going to say what Richie has been telling me and others (in not such a nice way) to do. Patience. The prices of centers are going to go down. We aren't going to let a couple of hundred thousand dollars stand in the way for someone who is not going to be the best offensive center, but can hit a 12 footer and a layup, pass and defend.
 
  • Love
Reactions: rubigtimenow

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,121
12,451
78
I'm going to say what Richie has been telling me and others (in not such a nice way) to do. Patience. The prices of centers are going to go down. We aren't going to let a couple of hundred thousand dollars stand in the way for someone who is not going to be the best offensive center, but can hit a 12 footer and a layup, pass and defend.
I hope your right but I would think the prices are going to go up per economics 101 - law of supply and demand. As less centers are available the bidding war concept is going to kick in for teams desperate to fill the position. That’s what I expect anyway.
 

-RUFAN4LIFE-

Heisman
Feb 28, 2015
32,319
50,494
113
I hope your right but I would think the prices are going to go up per economics 101 - law of supply and demand. As less centers are available the bidding war concept is going to kick in for teams desperate to fill the position. That’s what I expect anyway.
Supply and demand assumes it's the same product that is available in decreasing quantities. These bigs are not all the same and some asked for more than teams were willing to pay and now have adjusted their asking price.
 

Eagleton95.99

All-American
Jul 25, 2001
7,551
6,469
113
I hope your right but I would think the prices are going to go up per economics 101 - law of supply and demand. As less centers are available the bidding war concept is going to kick in for teams desperate to fill the position. That’s what I expect anyway.
Yes, but there’s the demand side. How many teams are left with super deep pockets?
 
  • Like
Reactions: carmenst

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
It’s not all about offense, we need a big who can defend and rebound in the B1G against grown men. While Lathan has offensive chops, and will be great on the banks, next year is so important we can’t expect him to protect the paint and defend yet. Ogbole isn’t there yet and might never be. We don’t know. This year is too important to leave it to chance. Defense still matters and down low that takes maturity, strength and experience. Even if we score 80 with a center only kicking in 6-8 we can’t give up 90 on so many second chance points your head will spin.
This.

Do I think Lathan will be good as a freshman? Yes. But no one knows. We all found out the hard way with Gavin last year that not everyone is ready to play well as a freshman. I have much more confidence in Lathan on the offensive end. How will he be as a rim protector?

Ogbole has physical tools and a full off season after missing last year's with an injury. That is huge for his development. He COULD make a jump and be able to contribute more but we just don't know

We need to mitigate risk at the 5 but bringing in someone who we know can play. Next year is just too important to rely on a freshman and developemntal raw project. Mitigate risk.

We should be able to find a solid big that can play 20 min a night without hurting us. Protect the rim. Rebound. Dunks and put backs. Get that and I'm happy. We don't need a stud. We don't need someone who demands the ball and needs shots. If Lathan is awesome a freshman, amazing. If Ogbole makes a huge jump, amazing. We need a reliable option in case either or both don't happen though
 

RedTeamUpstream94

All-American
Jan 15, 2021
3,376
6,310
113
This.

Do I think Lathan will be good as a freshman? Yes. But no one knows. We all found out the hard way with Gavin last year that not everyone is ready to play well as a freshman. I have much more confidence in Lathan on the offensive end. How will he be as a rim protector?

Ogbole has physical tools and a full off season after missing last year's with an injury. That is huge for his development. He COULD make a jump and be able to contribute more but we just don't know

We need to mitigate risk at the 5 but bringing in someone who we know can play. Next year is just too important to rely on a freshman and developemntal raw project. Mitigate risk.

We should be able to find a solid big that can play 20 min a night without hurting us. Protect the rim. Rebound. Dunks and put backs. Get that and I'm happy. We don't need a stud. We don't need someone who demands the ball and needs shots. If Lathan is awesome a freshman, amazing. If Ogbole makes a huge jump, amazing. We need a reliable option in case either or both don't happen though

^ Exactly this ^
 

Knights 1212

All-American
Sep 9, 2003
27,549
8,483
113
Just today Seton Hall got a commitment from Gus Yalden from Wisconsin who was called Gus the Bus or Gus the tank who we wanted but he chose Wisconsin over us and didn’t play at all this past season and I think he has four years of eligibility. Apparently he has lost forty pounds and is now 240 and 6’8” or 6’9” tall.
 

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,449
16,281
113
Just today Seton Hall got a commitment from Gus Yalden from Wisconsin who was called Gus the Bus or Gus the tank who we wanted but he chose Wisconsin over us and didn’t play at all this past season and I think he has four years of eligibility. Apparently he has lost forty pounds and is now 240 and 6’8” or 6’9” tall.
Baby Jokic comes with some baggage. Could be very good if he gets his act together.
 

RAC93

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2023
2,983
4,907
113
Whomever comes in is easily playing 20-25 mpg with Lathan getting the rest. Ogbole is literally the 12th/13th guy on the roster. He should only be used in cases of foul trouble. Playing him takes minutes away from Sommerville that are vital to his development. Everyone just needs to be patient. They will have a big on board soon.
Agreed regarding Ogbole, he’s not very good and is way down the bench. Get a big to pair with Somerville and that’s your two big men. Obgole plays limited minutes on occasion due to foul trouble, injury, etc.. He won’t see significant minutes in the regular rotation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -RUFAN4LIFE-

ru66

All-American
Jul 28, 2001
12,175
6,257
0
This year, how many games do you think Cliff dominated and was the main factor for our win and were those wins worth $1 million ??
 
  • Like
Reactions: socaldave

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,193
12,454
113
We thought we were the shiny new thing and talented kids would want to come play here because we’re cool. Turns out money is still the most shiny thing.
Bottom line the elite basketball programs will dominate recruiting.The NIL is just the latest excuse for mid level programs not being able to compete.Bailey and Harper were unique situations that will be difficult to repeat at Rutgers.
 

anon1753890747

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2006
3,891
3,679
72
This.

Do I think Lathan will be good as a freshman? Yes. But no one knows. We all found out the hard way with Gavin last year that not everyone is ready to play well as a freshman. I have much more confidence in Lathan on the offensive end. How will he be as a rim protector?

Ogbole has physical tools and a full off season after missing last year's with an injury. That is huge for his development. He COULD make a jump and be able to contribute more but we just don't know

We need to mitigate risk at the 5 but bringing in someone who we know can play. Next year is just too important to rely on a freshman and developemntal raw project. Mitigate risk.

We should be able to find a solid big that can play 20 min a night without hurting us. Protect the rim. Rebound. Dunks and put backs. Get that and I'm happy. We don't need a stud. We don't need someone who demands the ball and needs shots. If Lathan is awesome a freshman, amazing. If Ogbole makes a huge jump, amazing. We need a reliable option in case either or both don't happen though
On point Scangg!
 

anon1753890747

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2006
3,891
3,679
72
Agreed regarding Ogbole, he’s not very good and is way down the bench. Get a big to pair with Somerville and that’s your two big men. Obgole plays limited minutes on occasion due to foul trouble, injury, etc.. He won’t see significant minutes in the regular rotation.
I saw some interesting characteristics from Ogbole, during his minutes last year. I believe he is going to contribute more than this board expects.
 
Last edited:

anon1753890747

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2006
3,891
3,679
72
He didn’t “dominate” but his presence in the paint was important on D. Compensating for that will be harder than some think.
I think it will be considerably easier than most think, with a different skill set that better fit this team, most importantly defending the other teams 5.
The other 4 positions on the team will give us elite defense with less need for the 5 position to rim protect . Which is overrated. Especially if it doesn’t result in a change of possession..
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Scangg

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,121
12,451
78
Exactly. The real question is how many of our wins would we have lost if we had Ogbole at center instead of Cliff.

Actually, the issue for now with Ogbole is staying on the court moreso than bad D (Wolf had the poor D which is probably why he’s the one Pike nudged out). Ogbole plays physical but commits a lot of fouls. If he can’t stay out of foul trouble, that’s where we could run into problems without another veteran depending on how game ready Somerville comes in on D. I disagree with the idea that Ogbole will “hurt” us. Don’t see that even if he’s not the best offensive player. We don’t necessarily need that from our center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83

Mr. Magoo1

Heisman
Nov 15, 2001
15,449
16,281
113
Actually, the issue for now with Ogbole is staying on the court moreso than bad D (Wolf had the poor D which is probably why he’s the one Pike nudged out). Ogbole plays physical but commits a lot of fouls. If he can’t stay out of foul trouble, that’s where we could run into problems without another veteran depending on how game ready Somerville comes in on D. I disagree with the idea that Ogbole will “hurt” us. Don’t see that even if he’s not the best offensive player. We don’t necessarily need that from our center.
I could not agree more. He is a foul machine.
 

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,024
12,829
113
This year, how many games do you think Cliff dominated and was the main factor for our win and were those wins worth $1 million ??

Exactly. The real question is how many of our wins would we have lost if we had Ogbole at center instead of Cliff.

This is flawed analysis.
Last year's "center" role is likely (hopefully?) very different from next year's role.
Ideally the center next year isn't being relied upon for significant scoring. Ideally it could happen but it doesn't NEED to happen like it did last year.

Need to evaluate Clif (or any potential player) based on the role they are filling
Not the role they filled last year (or on previous teams).

I've said the same about the Acuff/Derkack transfers and JWill as well. They all appear to be great scorers with the ball in their hands.
But will that be their role next year - playing next to Dylan/Ace?
Or will they be more off ball - which puts a higher priority on other skills (such as outside shooting).

Player A could be better overall than Player B.
But if the actual role requires the skills of Player B - then Player B is the better acquisition for the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83