Toggle sidebar

BBM thread

Bkocats

Bkocats

Heisman
Jan 2, 2011
80,845
69,725
67
I thought it was hilarious - so completely opposite of what Cal really is that it worked.
 
Bkocats

Bkocats

Heisman
Jan 2, 2011
80,845
69,725
67
whoah, threads got merged - now my last post has no context whatsoever, LOL
 
LadyCaytIL

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,667
33,976
113
If Skal used that elevation on his jump shots to try and block shots.... He'd be every bit as dominant as Anthony Davis
 
LadyCaytIL

LadyCaytIL

Heisman
Oct 28, 2012
32,667
33,976
113
You can tell a lot about a person on whether they focus on the things they didnt like or they focus about the things they did like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: .S&C.
U

Uk1111

Sophomore
Aug 15, 2010
5,243
112
0
Yeah BKO, mine look out of place too. I understand the need to merge at times, but some topics deserve more than one thread and it's getting kind of old, esp the UL scandal thread. I like to just come here to get the latest news but you can't do that now. If you want the latest news about new evidence on stripergate you have to spend hours going through a mess of random topics and jokes and I don't have time to go through litterally thousands of new posts. Same with this thread only it's not as big. I don't have cable and simply wanted to know who looked good tonight, and once again instead of 3-4 good threads that make sense we have 1 big, random thread that doesn't make any sense at all. This has become a new thing and I hate it. I enjoyed coming to this board and expected multiple threads on one of the biggest nights of the year, and instead of having 4-5 good threads that make sense, have a big jumbled mess. I'd understand if there were great topics going off the front page before anyone can see them, but that's not the case. There's lots of threads that haven't had a comment for days, so basically now nobody can express an interesting new thought of the night, so that threads that have been dead for days can remain on the front page.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 420grover
W

WildMoon

Heisman
Apr 7, 2009
78,693
11,120
0
I think potential of this team is higher than last year's team.

Unfortunately, they just don't have the time/experience to reach the potential. I'm wondering how much they'll be able to reach.
 
S

.S&C.

All-American
Jul 8, 2014
45,292
6,422
0
bigblueinsanity said:
Im not more excited, because I knew the last team had a legit chance to be perfect. But I agree with you, that last year lacked elite talent, although it had tons of really good players. KAT was really the only elite player on that team.

In fact, one could certainly argue Wisconsin could put a better starting unit on the floor last year.

On this team Skal, Murray, and Ulis are all elite. We wont have as many really good players. But we can only play 5 at a time anyway. Injuries are the exception - an injury to a key player this year is devastating.



Ulis wasnt elite last year. Booker couldnt hit anything the beginning of the year. Then didnt miss for a month. Then couldnt buy one for another month or so. Definitely not elite.
Click to expand...

The myth that was Devin Bookers game grows by the day around here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigblueinsanity_rivals250340
C

Cat Ballou

All-Conference
Mar 23, 2007
5,234
4,502
0
Smashcat said:
2017 studs Wilkes and Gary Trent Jr.
Kristafer wilkes ‏@kadw31 16h16 hours ago

Coo lil time in Kentucky with the bro @THAT_KID_GARY pic.twitter.com/C5ahWCu9zN

Click to expand...


Hmmm...would love to break up that Trent/Carter package. Carter is a guy like Tatum that just seems to be a lock for Duke. Trent on the other hand, doesn't seem like the typical Duke recruit. Of course, neither does Giles.

Maybe we could sell Wilkes/Carter package.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom