Bama v Cats
- Thread starter jteten
- Start date
Wheels officially falling off the Wabash Cannonball.
At least ESPN is no longer glued to the Warner family luxury box.
A
anon_umk0ifu6vj6zi
Guest
Maybe now some people will understand the difference in talent level in the SEC vs all the wanna be’s in the rest of the country
We’ve had 20 years of evidence. This game won’t change the thoughts of those that shake their fists at clouds.
It's interesting that it's really only been the case over the last about 20 years. Prior to that it seemed like every major conference had dominant teams from time to time.
What this game is going to do is cause the casual CFB bettor to double down on the Dawgs and I wouldnt be shocked if the line moved a little
Absolutely. This Bama team lost two games and almost lost to a bad aTm team and a very average Texas team.
I assume this is a dig at the Big 10? Even they fluked into championships now and then. Laughingwell, not every major conference
I would suggest that the additions of USC and UCLA could have some impact on the balance of power…..but OU and Texas moving to the SEC offsets that impact.
I put 100 on Bama on the ML. I won’t get a lot back, but I never worried. I should have taken the points. I still think Bama is better than everyone else not named Georgia and would stomp Michigan, TCU and OSU.
Can’t wait for Averify to come over here with his italics and let us know how close KSU is that if Bama makes about 20 less plays they are right in it
It
It isn't going to matter what he does. The difference in athletic ability is glaring if you didn't notice. No amount of coaching can overcome that across the field.
I was thinking the same thing. So far the B12 is 1-5 in bowl games, and assuming KSU doesn’t come up with some miracle in the 4th the conference will drop to 1-6. I have a feeling TCU is going to struggle against Michigan and if so that’s going to shed a really nasty light on how far behind the B12 is against the rest of the P5.
That sounds good in theory, but I would take Bama by 6.5 over Michigan. If you had to choose Michigan and the money line or Bama -6.5 v Mich, where is your money going?
Going to be interesting to see how OU and UT do. On paper they should be competitive but I think they are going to struggle for a while.
Michigan has been a better team than Bama all year, so I’ll take Michigan and the money line. . What have seen that makes you think Bama would even be favored in that game?
I agree but Michigan could at least cause them problems. Give them an ace QB and they would be right there.
Just playing devils advocate, but bama lost two games that were I believed decided at the end of the game against two good teams in LSU and Tennessee on the road. I think Michigan is s fraud and would put money on bama on the ML against Michigan all day. I even took TCU and the points today.
They also beat Texas by 1, who isn’t very good and were insanely lucky to beat a bad Texas aTm team. I was on board with Michigan being a fraud until they dismantled OSU, kind of hard to say that now. Tonight’s semifinal games should be enlightening.
Well, there is no way to prove it of course, but I’m quite sure that a 2 loss Bama team would be , at the very minimum, a pick ‘em against Michigan on a neutral, nice weather field. That money would be even easier than the silly 7.5 line put on this one. Maybe I’m basing it on talent and year over year dominance, as opposed to Bama losing to 2 top 10 SEC teams. Close wins are irrelevant. Michigan barely beat Maryland and Illinois but those are still wins.