Because they still want to set the standard for everything. Even if it's something they don't believe or won't partake in.
Another perfect example of using data to say what you want it to right? It was the 2nd highest watched show ever, true statement. Then you look at the data that shows the game was the 2nd highest watched, so that makes sense. Of course you can take the data about the drop in ratings to say look 7 million people stopped watch during halftime, also true. There is one other variable, no other halftime show has had a competing halftime show that was advertised nationally as a replacement. So many variables.why would the media lie to us? They told us it was a overwhelming success![]()
bad music = bad ideaSeems like another Bud Light "Dylan Mulvaney" disaster in the making. I think they should just re-run the Janet Jackson halftime performance w/o editng
On3 Football
USA Today shakes up top QB rankings ahead of Week 3 of college football
Rivals Football Recruiting
Week 3 Guide: New predictions and intel ahead star-studded visitor weekends at Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Texas and more
Rivals Football Recruiting
Rivals300 recruits give Nebraska high marks after weekend trip to Lincoln
On3 Football
Nebraska, Notre Dame announce home-and-home football series for 2032, 2033
College Football Playoff
ESPN ranks Top 25 teams with highest chance to make College Football Playoff after Week 2