I wont give you grief I'd just like to know what the ideal ranking is for a Calipari UK team, seeing as how they are usually going to be young with the kind of turnover we have ?Probably going to take a lot of grief....I'd rather not be #1 with this young of a team. Puts unnecessary pressure on the guys. Just want the number #1 seed in the Louisville region at the end of the season. World Class problems to have though!
Would you rather we lose than be ranked number one?Probably going to take a lot of grief....I'd rather not be #1 with this young of a team. Puts unnecessary pressure on the guys. Just want the number #1 seed in the Louisville region at the end of the season. World Class problems to have though!
I wont give you grief I'd just like to know what the ideal ranking is for a Calipari UK team, seeing as how they are usually going to be young with the kind of turnover we have ?
Keep in mind that, assuming my figures are correct, we are 63-5 under Cal as the #1 ranked team
It's also good for recruiting in my opinion. HS recruits that constantly see UK as the #1 team have got to aspire to play at and with the best.Anywhere from #2-#10....we typically play a challenging enough non-conference that if we stay in that range we have a great chance at a number #1 or #2 seed which is really what it's all about. Being #1 gets you nothing other than making your opponent play even harder and more inspired against you. Also it means a lot to me to be the winningest college program of all time and I want to extend our lead over Kansas as much as possible. Playing with extra pressure with a young inexperienced team is a recipe for dropping an extra game or two that we should win and therefore further extend our lead over North Carolina and Kansas.
Missing their very good point guard, this was bound to happen. Not getting overly excited about what UNC does or doesn't do without Paige.
there's lots of angles to look at this from. I could make the case that rankings, later in the season, will be reflective of how teams have performed. Therefore if a team as talented UK was ranked worse than #3-4 it would mean that we had ALREADY lost a game or two.... or three, which blows the theory about winning more games (which I care about just as you do)Anywhere from #2-#10....we typically play a challenging enough non-conference that if we stay in that range we have a great chance at a number #1 or #2 seed which is really what it's all about. Being #1 gets you nothing other than making your opponent play even harder and more inspired against you. Also it means a lot to me to be the winningest college program of all time and I want to extend our lead over Kansas as much as possible. Playing with extra pressure with a young inexperienced team is a recipe for dropping an extra game or two that we should win and therefore further extend our lead over North Carolina and Kansas.
63-5, that's incredible. I'm sure Pitino is close to that in games played while ranked 1 at Louisville.#2 ranked under Cal 26-2
#3 ranked 20-2
#8 ranked 4-3
#10 2-4
63-5 as #1 ranked
52-11 as #2-10 ranked
Probably going to take a lot of grief....I'd rather not be #1 with this young of a team. Puts unnecessary pressure on the guys. Just want the number #1 seed in the Louisville region at the end of the season. World Class problems to have though!
Cal does say Kentucky isn't for everyone!:boxing:If the pressure of being #1 breaks you, then you shouldn't be at Kentucky in the first place.
Being #1 early is nothing but good for the team anyways, if they falter, they'll learn and be better for it.
Or maybe they run with it all year...:sunglasses: