For a td was not a roughing Qb penality. The Qb was hit after the ball was intercepted ......thus the Qb was mearly being blocked......now the block in the back may be a penality but should not be roughing the passer.....
You are incorrect. The hit was part of rushing the passer. It was not a block. It was clearly roughing the passer, it was stupid and unnecessary. The refs got it right. In fact, while I thought they missed a lot from the stands on watching the game on TV they actually got most calls right. They definitely could have called some more holds on UK and not flagging the interference was ridiculous, even though it wouldn't have mattered.For a td was not a roughing Qb penality. The Qb was hit after the ball was intercepted ......thus the Qb was mearly being blocked......now the block in the back may be a penality but should not be roughing the passer.....
Roughing the passer: No defensive player may charge into a passer or throw him to the ground when it’s obvious the pass has been thrown, unless he is blocked by a Team A player into the QB with a force that prevents contact. Penalty is 15 yds and automatic 1st down from the end of the last run if beyond NZ and there is no change of team possession. If pass is incomplete, intercepted or completed, but receiver is tackled behind LOS, enforce from previous spot
Maroon and White Basketball
Xavier 81-63 Mississippi State: Distance shooting hurts Bulldogs in Greenbrier defeat
Maroon and White Football
Kickoff Time Change: Mississippi State vs. Auburn
Maroon and White Football
Mississippi State Keys to Victory vs. Auburn
Rivals Basketball Recruiting
4-star center Chris Brown commits to Mississippi State
Maroon and White Football
Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Auburn Q and A