Its exactly what the situation is. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT DRIVES EVERYTHING! if you're a coach with options, you go to the situation with the most institutional support. You're a player, you go to the situation with the most institutional support. What you don't do, is go to a place where the institutional support is questionable. Where it's weak. Where it could be taken away. That's Barchi's Rutgers. That's his legacy. The record speaks for itself.This is how I feel in a nutshell. The program is dead to me until Barchi is gone and I have no interest in speaking with Pat Hobbs either for that stupid fvcking contract he agreed to, IDGAS how other sports are doing, football is and always will be numero uno. We will have 15k people at our games AGAIN this year as we go down 3-4 TDs by halftime against anyone and everyone. It enrages me.
I think Flood was a disaster with or without IS. To be a great HC you have to have energy, passion, high intelligence, high football iq, determination and desire to be the leader and all that goes with it...Flood's a good guy but he lacks huge percentages of every category required in his inherent make up. If you can't see that, don't ever have an opinion on coaches because his shortcomings are obvious and you don't see it.
Ash would benefit greatly from IS. But for what Rutgers is, we needed more of a bs'er, a talker, a dreamer, a pied piper of the program. He's not that and a huge mistake of Hobbs to hire a guy with an obvious, assistant coaches' personality, given all that that person would need to overcome.
Any success a HC could have had here over the last five or six years would have come down to a vision and the ability to sell it. Otherwise,what else is there? Not nearly enough.