Articles of Impeachment

Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
LOL

Prove it. You're an idiot.

Dude, you have proven your stupidity on this board countless times. I truly feel sorry for some of you guys. You really are extremely mentally challenged. I feel sorry for some of you the same way I feel sorry for those who are physically disabled.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
The documents they are requesting are related to the ongoing investigation. They can f'uck off.

I know that. This is a game, they won't vote on this. The House disappears for a month tomorrow.

They haven't said which investigation. Is it Mueller, who Rosenstein has said on multiple times that Trump is not under investigation, or it is Huber, who has yet to publicize one indictment?
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Dude, you have proven your stupidity on this board countless times. I truly feel sorry for some of you guys. You really are extremely mentally challenged. I feel sorry for some of you the same way I feel sorry for those who are physically disabled.

You calling anyone stupid is laughable. You attempting to even be on my plane of existence is tawdry. Move along peon.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,587
6,172
113
Dude, you have proven your stupidity on this board countless times. I truly feel sorry for some of you guys. You really are extremely mentally challenged. I feel sorry for some of you the same way I feel sorry for those who are physically disabled.

I feel sorry for someone who doesn't even know what race they are or worse lies about it!
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,587
6,172
113
Easy, the documents being withheld show potential FBI and DOJ misdeeds, not Trump.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
"misdeeds" related to what? Russia collusion investigation? = Trump

Mitigate your statement with Rosenstein to Trump: "You are not under investigation". You are smoking some good stuff in order to believe your own ********.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,587
6,172
113
Agree, none of this has anything to do with Trump.[roll][roll][roll] :eek:kay: [thumb2]

It has everything to do with rampant corruption in the DOJ. You refusing to see it shows how corrupted you've become.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You calling anyone stupid is laughable. You attempting to even be on my plane of existence is tawdry. Move along peon.

And yet you post this? LOL!

Is it Mueller, who Rosenstein has said on multiple times that Trump is not under investigation, or it is Huber, who has yet to publicize one indictment?

No one has said "trump is not under investigation." They have said trump is not a "target." Learn the difference. You are a complete moron if you think trump is not under investigation.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
They should quit asking and quit trying to interfere in ongoing investigations for political reasons.

LOL... come on now. Just because you don't like the questions, doesn't mean it's not their right and place to ask them.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
283
83
LOL... come on now. Just because you don't like the questions, doesn't mean it's not their right and place to ask them.
They should quit trying to interfere with ongoing investigations. Apparently Congress agrees or they'd all be behind this bogus impeachment attempt.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
They should quit trying to interfere with ongoing investigations. Apparently Congress agrees or they'd all be behind this bogus impeachment attempt.

How is asking a question interfering?
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
283
83
How is asking a question interfering?
Asking questions? Among other things, they're seeking documents that they don't have yet. Misleading statements?! That's what Trump does 24/7 so what's the big deal with that if true? and saying that Trump makes misleading statements is being kind.

The resolution, introduced by Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., chairman of the House Freedom Caucus; Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio; and nine co-sponsors, alleges that Rosenstein has withheld documents from and made misleading statements to Congress.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,587
6,172
113
They should quit trying to interfere with ongoing investigations. Apparently Congress agrees or they'd all be behind this bogus impeachment attempt.

If it's "bogus" why has the Democrat leadership asked all the candidates to stop talking about it? Especially this clueless wonder

"Impeach 45!!!!!! Impeach 45!!!!! Impeach 45!!!!!"
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,587
6,172
113
Asking questions? Among other things, they're seeking documents that they don't have yet. Misleading statements?! That's what Trump does 24/7 so what's the big deal with that if true? and saying that Trump makes misleading statements is being kind.

The resolution, introduced by Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., chairman of the House Freedom Caucus; Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio; and nine co-sponsors, alleges that Rosenstein has withheld documents from and made misleading statements to Congress.

What would be the issue here if Rosen-what's-his-face just gave them whatever they're asking for? Why should anything be "off limits"? Who's his boss?
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
Dude, you have proven your stupidity on this board countless times. I truly feel sorry for some of you guys. You really are extremely mentally challenged. I feel sorry for some of you the same way I feel sorry for those who are physically disabled.
you sound like White Goodman
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,601
818
113
And yet you post this? LOL!



No one has said "trump is not under investigation." They have said trump is not a "target." Learn the difference. You are a complete moron if you think trump is not under investigation.
You might want to take your own advice.
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
They're not interfering with the Independent Counsel.

24 hours later: “I realize after reading the transcript that I misspoke. I should have said ‘They aren’t not interfering’...a little double negative there. I think if you drop that in there it clears it up and it’s much better. Ok? Thank you.”
 

malew1

Sophomore
May 17, 2006
4,991
149
0
24 hours later: “I realize after reading the transcript that I misspoke. I should have said ‘They aren’t not interfering’...a little double negative there. I think if you drop that in there it clears it up and it’s much better. Ok? Thank you.”
You forgot "no colusion"