Are we really seeing progress?

OxfordComma

Senior
Feb 4, 2020
618
677
93
If we finish 8-4 overall and 5-4 in the B1G, I would argue that is progress. I would argue 7-5 with this schedule is not.

I would like to see this team progress and get better during the season, which would correlate with an 8-4 finish.
 

cestrup

All-Conference
Sep 23, 2021
3,073
1,228
113
we're soft

and we will always be soft as long as Rhule is our Team Mom because he is soft

he has shown he has zero desire to run a physical football program despite his endless preaching to the contrary
I think “team mom” is far better than “preacher rhule”
 

TheHiker

Sophomore
Jul 7, 2025
99
135
33
Last year at this exact juncture, NU was 5-2, the same as this year.

Last year NU played 4 good football teams, COLO, ILL, IND and OSU, and went 1-3.
This year we've played 2 good football teams, CINCY and MICH and went 1-1.

We swapped UTEP, NO. IA, PUR, RUT, and WISCY for AKRON, HOU CHRISTIAN, MICH ST, MARY, MINN and PSU.

In our remaining 5 games we have 3 teams yet to play that all beat us last year. We're just beginning our late season collapse with no Wisconsin on the horizon.

If NU fails to beat NW, we are likely 5-5 going into PSU.
Do we think it will be easy in front of 107K? We need PSU to be this year's Wisconsin.
We won't need to worry about playing in front of 107K fans.
 

mgbreeze

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2004
10,076
3,490
113
If we finish 8-4 overall and 5-4 in the B1G, I would argue that is progress. I would argue 7-5 with this schedule is not.

I would like to see this team progress and get better during the season, which would correlate with an 8-4 finish.
I agree. Looking at the schedule alongside how we played Friday - it gets real tough to see 3 wins.
 

itseasyas1-2-3

All-Conference
Sep 6, 2021
9,805
2,137
113
we're soft

and we will always be soft as long as Rhule is our Team Mom because he is soft

he has shown he has zero desire to run a physical football program despite his endless preaching to the contrary
You would think 3 years into the Rhule regime, and having added Ben Scott, Mazzuccua, Knaak, Spindler, Pritchett into a veteran group of OLmen we would be mature and physical. We are neither.
 

Mack In Motion

All-Conference
Jun 20, 2001
5,988
3,510
113
Last year at this exact juncture, NU was 5-2, the same as this year.

Last year NU played 4 good football teams, COLO, ILL, IND and OSU, and went 1-3.
This year we've played 2 good football teams, CINCY and MICH and went 1-1.

We swapped UTEP, NO. IA, PUR, RUT, and WISCY for AKRON, HOU CHRISTIAN, MICH ST, MARY, MINN and PSU.

In our remaining 5 games we have 3 teams yet to play that all beat us last year. We're just beginning our late season collapse with no Wisconsin on the horizon.

If NU fails to beat NW, we are likely 5-5 going into PSU.
Do we think it will be easy in front of 107K? We need PSU to be this year's Wisconsin.
Do we have a single player on the roster (now year 3) on our OL or DL that will get even a conf. honorable mention?

Until that changes, and we have players there regularly, we will not progress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDude75

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,104
2,380
98
I didn't read all of the posts, don't have time. Unfortunately, all of these symptoms have been there for the last three years. Just my opinion but I saw if for years at the HS level, the good coaches were very detailed and fixed problems, didn't let them go and keep repeating them

Special teams is a great example. We now have a great coach and it is showing up with results. The results are a product of excellent teaching of the much finer details of special teams play. Honestly all we see are the results on game day but during practice he is likely on kids if they are two steps to the left or right too far, not holding the ball just right or some very small adjustment. Good coaches do that all of the time.

Why did Dana stay with the Sat offense and not introduce his own? Where are the combo routes, natural pick plays, and more. Our WR room seems to be upgraded as many have pointed out but why aren't they getting open more? Too long routes, not crisp routes, poor adjustments between QB and WR.

Why do we keep making the same dumb calls inside the 10 yard line. If you bet 1st down would be a fade to the right you would win more often than not. Second play is EJ to the right where 5 guys are waiting. Then another pass and by this time the rush has overwhelmed DR and he panics.

Our D coordinator is just not good, regardless of where our Pass D WAS ranked. That was due to lousy opponents. My biggest complaints on his D are he can't consistently stop the run (so who cares if you HAD the highest ranked pass D), he does not secure the edge, he lives by the blitz and you saw the outcome of that against Minny on the screen on 3rd and long, and finally, our LB's are totally out of position and get arms on tacklers most of the time but no body. I do think we have a good LB coach and have seen good play there in the past so I am going to lay this at the DC's feet.

Our O line is just so horrible, I know HS coaches who could produce better results. I won't say we have AA players at every position but we are much better than we are showing. Where are all the other coaches who have coached OL? Didn't Rhule coach that position at one time?

I could go on but ultimately it comes down to Rhule. He is a communicator, pure and simple, not a coach in the pure sense of the word. If he was, he would be spotting problems with footwork and hand placement in practice and get it fixed. All the great coaches do/did that. Tom was famous for it, Saban would walk by a position group and notice something and get it corrected. We are aren't correcting anything.

Does anyone really think Minny has more and better athletes than we do? What they have is superior coaching during the week, planning against an opponent and game day management which our current staff does not have.

Lastly, I questioned if we could win consistently with Raiola as the QB. He makes us way too one dimensional and vulnerable. The opposing team really needs to stop one person on our team, Dylan. Think about it.
 
Last edited:

K Rod

Senior
Oct 1, 2025
348
527
93
Do we have a single player on the roster (now year 3) on our OL or DL that will get even a conf. honorable mention?

Until that changes, and we have players there regularly, we will not progress.
The real question is how many of our O linemen will end up as UFA in the NFL draft, get signed to a practice squad, and a couple of years later with proper coaching and proper strength training, end up getting an NFL contract. Thats what happened with Nick Gates, and Jurgens got a lot bigger, and stronger when he went to the Eagles. Probably will be the case with Hutmacher as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WHCSC

HuskerBruce81

All-American
Nov 7, 2012
39,978
6,010
113
Rhule stinks and got lucky at Baylor, not only that but he doesnt have the same OC and DC from Baylor here.
Butler isn’t terrible but not great either.
Dana, don’t get me started… I don’t know what the guy is running but it isn’t what he ran 8 years ago. We need a run first OC that demands his linemen block and that can scheme up good run plays.
Uncle Donnie… ha! The worst OL coach in our history, makes that stubby dwarf under Riley look like Dan Young.

just 3 more seasons of this, and we can get rid of him, with next year being brutal:
Losses to ILL, Wash, Oregon, OSU, Indiana, Iowa… and tossups v Maryland, Mich St, Rutgers

we could go 4-8… be prepared
Dana isn't running what he ran 8 years ago. He was handed Satterfields playbook and told to run that for some reason. This isn't on Dana.
 

Bigred2467

All-Conference
Jul 4, 2025
1,073
1,542
113
Dana isn't running what he ran 8 years ago. He was handed Satterfields playbook and told to run that for some reason. This isn't on Dana.
That made sense when he took over play calling with less than half of the season left. But was he told that after the season was over?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kakdawg

OxfordComma

Senior
Feb 4, 2020
618
677
93
Yes he is running what Rhule dictates to him which is Satterfields playbook.
I am not sure what Rhule contributes to X’s and O’s or basic identity in any of the 3 phases of the game. I am afraid it’s not much. I do remember him picking up a play call sheet in the UCLA loss, and it seemed like he was looking at it for the first time.
 

cestrup

All-Conference
Sep 23, 2021
3,073
1,228
113
I am not sure what Rhule contributes to X’s and O’s or basic identity in any of the 3 phases of the game. I am afraid it’s not much. I do remember him picking up a play call sheet in the UCLA loss, and it seemed like he was looking at it for the first time.
I don’t think you get enough credit for being one of the better trolls I’ve seen here. I’m not being insulting, it’s commendable
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kakdawg

Hans81

All-Conference
Aug 13, 2004
16,424
2,905
98
Indiana (besides OSU) is the only team in the is conference that is actually trying to score points and not just run out the clock and go home with either a close win or a huge beatdown loss.

They are the only team to show "progress" over the last two years. The rest of the Big Ten is exactly what it has always been. OSU and for the most part, a bunch of lame *** teams.
lol…keep telling yourself that.
 

Spinner4

Senior
Jun 5, 2022
584
819
93
Losing to teams we should beat is not progress, it’s stagnant.

having the 81st recruiting class in the nation is dam right scary. someone going to tell me again that they trust Rhule’s eye for find raw talent over the recruiting websites? Sure looks like he does. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dylman

king_kong__

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2021
3,506
4,725
113
Losing to teams we should beat is not progress, it’s stagnant.

having the 81st recruiting class in the nation is dam right scary. someone going to tell me again that they trust Rhule’s eye for find raw talent over the recruiting websites? Sure looks like he does. LOL
Half our 2 deep are still frost guys

in Year Three

“The Right Way”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dylman

BigRedTed

Freshman
Nov 20, 2021
1,429
94
48
Think we have to wait to see how the next 5 games turn out... but if I were to give an opinion for so far this season? Honestly I'd have to say no. To me we haven't made much if any progress.

We're 5-2 with a brief appereance in the rankings. Look soft on the lines. Same script as last year against a debately easier schedule. We are fortunate to avoid OSU, Indiana and Oregon this year. And we get to play a Penn State team that has gone down like the Titanic.

We can conceivably win every game left on this schedule. But I can see us losing every game left as well. So again let's see how it turns out. But so far I haven't been overly impressed.
 
Nov 28, 2016
3,382
803
92
we're soft

and we will always be soft as long as Rhule is our Team Mom because he is soft

he has shown he has zero desire to run a physical football program despite his endless preaching to the contrary
I hate to admit this but all this is true. The egg the Huskers laid at Minnesota told me everything I need to know about this team. I thought they had turned the corner but no. While slightly improved, they are still the same Nebraska of the last 10 years. The only improvement is in Special Teams.

I’m predicting a close win against Northwestern and losses the rest of the way. An ineffective O-line and a Defense that can’t tackle won‘t win games. Year Three magic was simply a house of cards. 6-6 and go a lesser bowl is still better than no bowl because this team can use all the practice time they can get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigRedTed

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,381
12,798
78
If we finish 8-4 overall and 5-4 in the B1G, I would argue that is progress. I would argue 7-5 with this schedule is not.

I would like to see this team progress and get better during the season, which would correlate with an 8-4 finish.
Meh. One win one way or another probably isn’t a great determiner. My eyeballs tell me we still have a far piece to go. Far is pronounced “fer”, for you city folks. 8 wins would make us feel a little better. But that’s just feelings. At times we show things that look like a 10 win team. Next minute we fall apart.

IMO we got pretty lucky at Maryland. Maybe actually wining that game shows progress. Maybe not. It was really any number of “one plays” that could have swung that and many games. We have too many one score games to make too many judgements. It’s probably wise to just TRY to enjoy the games and not get too high or low depending on the outcomes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K Rod
Jul 10, 2008
3,728
720
112
We’ve improved in many areas but there’s not much opportunity to show it because the offensive line is complete trash. If we had an elite offensive line we would be 5-1 or 6-0 and looking good
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,381
12,798
78
You would think 3 years into the Rhule regime, and having added Ben Scott, Mazzuccua, Knaak, Spindler, Pritchett into a veteran group of OLmen we would be mature and physical. We are neither.
We appear to me to be trying to be a finesse O line. Pass blocking is one of the tougher things for O linemen to do and yet we drop back 40 times per game. That doesn’t seem logical to me. Dana says he calls what’s working. Well what we did Saturday giving up 9 sacks sure as hell isn’t working. Might as well hand it off 3 times and hope you break a run.
 

BleedRed89

Heisman
Nov 27, 2008
34,371
53,381
113
I do believe that Rhule has improved most areas of the team. The locker room culture being the biggest.

However, all of that is rendered completly moot when he is fielding what is without hyperbole the worst position group I have ever seen a P5 team trot onto the field in this years O-line. I mean that genuinely and sincerely - I have never seen an entire position group perform as poorly as this. It's unfathomable. So while I like parts of what Rhule is doing, if there is not a major change made to the O-line and soon, he can go to Penn State for all I care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InMotion and Dylman

Thortulz

Freshman
Jan 6, 2008
214
78
23
I didn't read all of the posts, don't have time. Unfortunately, all of these symptoms have been there for the last three years. Just my opinion but I saw if for years at the HS level, the good coaches were very detailed and fixed problems, didn't let them go and keep repeating them

Special teams is a great example. We now have a great coach and it is showing up with results. The results are a product of excellent teaching of the much finer details of special teams play. Honestly all we see are the results on game day but during practice he is likely on kids if they are two steps to the left or right too far, not holding the ball just right or some very small adjustment. Good coaches do that all of the time.

Why did Dana stay with the Sat offense and not introduce his own? Where are the combo routes, natural pick plays, and more. Our WR room seems to be upgraded as many have pointed out but why aren't they getting open more? Too long routes, not crisp routes, poor adjustments between QB and WR.

Why do we keep making the same dumb calls inside the 10 yard line. If you bet 1st down would be a fade to the right you would win more often than not. Second play is EJ to the right where 5 guys are waiting. Then another pass and by this time the rush has overwhelmed DR and he panics.

Our D coordinator is just not good, regardless of where our Pass D WAS ranked. That was due to lousy opponents. My biggest complaints on his D are he can't consistently stop the run (so who cares if you HAD the highest ranked pass D), he does not secure the edge, he lives by the blitz and you saw the outcome of that against Minny on the screen on 3rd and long, and finally, our LB's are totally out of position and get arms on tacklers most of the time but no body. I do think we have a good LB coach and have seen good play there in the past so I am going to lay this at the DC's feet.

Our O line is just so horrible, I know HS coaches who could produce better results. I won't say we have AA players at every position but we are much better than we are showing. Where are all the other coaches who have coached OL? Didn't Rhule coach that position at one time?

I could go on but ultimately it comes down to Rhule. He is a communicator, pure and simple, not a coach in the pure sense of the word. If he was, he would be spotting problems with footwork and hand placement in practice and get it fixed. All the great coaches do/did that. Tom was famous for it, Saban would walk by a position group and notice something and get it corrected. We are aren't correcting anything.

Does anyone really think Minny has more and better athletes than we do? What they have is superior coaching during the week, planning against an opponent and game day management which our current staff does not have.

Lastly, I questioned if we could win consistently with Raiola as the QB. He makes us way too one dimensional and vulnerable. The opposing team really needs to stop one person on our team, Dylan. Think about it.
There's so much I agree with in your post, especially the effects of what good coaching can have on an athlete.

I am very concerned about not just how this season began but how it's been playing out so far. With the exception of Special Teams the remainder of the team looks like a horrific version of a keystone kapers skit gone bad. Both lines have terrible footwork, hand placement and just awful overall positional awareness of where they are supposed to be on any given play.

However I am confident that if the right coaches could get their hands on these athletes they could start living up to their potential. Whether or not the AD can guide Rhule into making the necessary changes to help these young men before he loses his job is anyone's guess.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: cestrup