Anyone Watching England/Algeria?

af102

Redshirt
May 17, 2009
712
29
28
From espn gamecast, if looks like Algeria is playing much better than they did against Slovenia. Any thoughts from those not stuck in front of their work computer?
 

af102

Redshirt
May 17, 2009
712
29
28
From espn gamecast, if looks like Algeria is playing much better than they did against Slovenia. Any thoughts from those not stuck in front of their work computer?
 

o_SurfDawg

Redshirt
Dec 9, 2008
31
0
0
I didn't see Algeria play against Slovenia but I've been impressed with them so far. They have played it pretty even so far and have been the more attacking side so far. However, I get the feeling they are prone to giving up an easy goal.
 

af102

Redshirt
May 17, 2009
712
29
28
Both they and slovenia were aweful. There were so many balls that were just given away right in the middle of the field. Nice to see they are making England work
 

o_SurfDawg

Redshirt
Dec 9, 2008
31
0
0
England starting to open things up more, and creating more chances. Just trying to hold on to the tie before halftime.
 

Hotel Roosevelt

Redshirt
Sep 18, 2009
281
0
0
Fell asleep during Slovenia/Algeria, so this is the first time I've really seen Algeria. Either they are better than I expected or England isn't that good. Either way, sucks for us. I'm really rooting for England to put Algeria out of the tournament. Our best shot is probably beating an Algeria with nothing to play for.
 

af102

Redshirt
May 17, 2009
712
29
28
I don't know if I like playing teams that have nothing to lose. Things end up one of 2 ways- A. they play everyone who hasn't got on, don't careand get killed, or B. (more likely) they play balls to the walls since they have no fear. A team with nothing to lose can be extremely dangerous
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,031
113
Wow. Still 0-0 in the 78th minute. Looks like England is underacheiving in a World Cup yet again. Haven't made it past the quarterfinals since they won it in 1966.
 

dawgstudent

Heisman
Apr 15, 2003
40,732
22,963
113
Slovenia will have 4 points.
US and England will have 2 points
Algeria will have one.

If US wins - they are automatically in by my calculations. England-Algeria tie is the best for the US because a win over Algeria guarantees a spot.
 

UpTheMiddlex3Punt

All-Conference
May 28, 2007
18,207
4,353
113
Amazing. A win by US, England, or Slovenia is a guarantee. Algeria must win to advance, and would need either Slovenia to win or Slovenia to tie so long as they beat the US by more than 2 or score 2 more goals than England does against Slovenia. Confusing, isn't it?
 

Predestined

Senior
Dec 5, 2008
2,680
633
113
a win we are in.

Of course, Algeria would have something to play for too. A win with an England loss would put them in.
 

Predestined

Senior
Dec 5, 2008
2,680
633
113
we just would have had to win by two.

of course if Algeria can tie England, we may not be able to beat them by two. What the hell is England doing?
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,031
113
And it's a final. England - 0, Algeria - 0. If the US beats Algeria on Wednesday, we advance no matter what happens between England and Slovenia.
 

Sutterkane

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
5,100
0
0
we win the group if

we beat algeria AND
england wins, and we both win by the same margin (more goals scored)
england/slovenia tie, we win by 2 goals (margin of victory)

If we tie Algeria we are still in with:
Slovenia victory
 

Predestined

Senior
Dec 5, 2008
2,680
633
113
although it will be tough.

If we draw and Slovenia wins, we advance.

If we draw and Slo-Eng draw, it comes to GD bw us and England which will be the same.

Then I think its goals scored, which we hold the edge 2-1 for now.

Just win. If you had said we will play the worst team in the bracket needing a win to advance I'd take it. Then again, i would never haver thought Algeria would tie her majesty's team. And yet England has only to win too.

If I were Slovenia after blowing a 2-0 lead I'd be nervous now...
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,031
113
If the ref allows that goal, we clinch advancement with a draw vs. Algeria no matter what happens with England-Slovenia.

One slight correction to you. We actually hold a 3-1 edge over England in goals scored. If they draw with Slovenia and wedraw withAlgeria, they would have to score 2 goals more than us just to get it to a random draw for advancement.
 

rugbdawg

Redshirt
Oct 10, 2006
5,251
0
0
I find it hard to believe that we won't at least score one goal...that would force the Brits and Slovenia to score 3 each. As the announcer said, England could have played for 6 hours today and they wouldn't have scored a goal.
 

Sutterkane

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
5,100
0
0
pretty much describes this entire world cup so far. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if it played out like that. If Algeria can hold England scoreless they sure as hell can hold us scoreless too. Remember, we are M-St...err USA soccer.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
61,315
33,031
113
We gained a 2-goals scored advantage over them in 1 day. We could lose it in 1 day. I doubt it, but like Sutterkane says, nothing would surprise me much any more.
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White "I started something I didn't finish": Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor joins Sports Center to talk 2027 return
  2. 02 Maroon and White Basketball Bulldogs prepare to level up competition, starting with Xavier in neutral site meeting
  3. 03 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Who carries the load?
  4. 04 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Run vs. Run
  5. 05 Maroon and White Basketball Mississippi State 79-57 Troy: Bulldogs build big early lead in home win over Trojans