Hey this looks like evidence. I wonder how many on here will read this but act like they didn’t
this is getting out of hand. i am convinced you guys cant actually read and just post random wandering ******** and see what sticks.
what you posted is the incoherent ramblings of a moron. there aren't even any allegations in there it's just a bunch of circumstance.
![]()
i conclude that the sky is brown and the dirt is blue. i dont have any evidence of such, but there is so much in my world that is either brown or blue when i walk outside that must be the case, right? i see a lot of blue stuff all the time and there is a lot of dirt in the world so it must hold true, right?This is an excerpt from forensic the audit of the Dominion machines
![]()
The "expert" behind the report was hired by the Trump campaign and is from a Dallas-based firm that has no expertise in election administration or technology but does have a history of amplifying fake documents. Oh yeah, he is also the same idiot who confused districts in Minnesota and Michigan in a previous court case, as the Detroit Free Press reports:
"Ramsland, a cybersecurity analyst and former Republican congressional candidate, mistook voting jurisdictions in Minnesota for Michigan towns in one recent flawed analysis of voter turnout in the Nov. 3 election. In another, filed in support of a federal lawsuit filed in Michigan, he made wildly inaccurate claims about voter turnout in various Michigan municipalities claiming that Detroit, where turnout was 51%, had turnout of 139%, and that North Muskegon, which had turnout of 78%, had voter turnout of 782%."
Here's what the state of Michigan's Election Elections Director said of the report: it "makes a series of unsupported conclusions, ascribes motives of fraud and obfuscation to processes that are easily explained as routine election procedures or error corrections, and suggests without explanation that elements of election software not used in Michigan are somehow responsible for tabulation or reporting errors that are either nonexistent or easily explained."
https://www.freep.com/story/news/po...spute-report-antrim-county-voting/6538325002/
As the election administrator notes in this article, all ballots in Michigan are marked by hand so if the Trump campaign had any actual evidence of fraud, they could have asked for a hand recount of every ballot in the state, which they never did. Regardless, just to be totally transparent, the Michigan Bureau of Elections and Antrim County will be conducting a hand tally of ballots to confirm the results. As a reminder, when Georgia did a hand recount of their ballots, the results matched the machine results.
Just amazing to me that after like 25 of these kooky conspiracy theories have been debunked, you credulous goobs keep getting all excited about the next one.
Thanks for confirming you can have evidence served to you on a silver platter & still deny the existence of evidencei conclude that the sky is brown and the dirt is blue. i dont have any evidence of such, but there is so much in my world that is either brown or blue when i walk outside that must be the case, right? i see a lot of blue stuff all the time and there is a lot of dirt in the world so it must hold true, right?
do you know what the word circumstance means?
i suppose you also take issue with all those dumb judges that agree with me. sad what trump has turned you intoThanks for confirming you can have evidence served to you on a silver platter & still deny the existence of evidence
If this is real, I expect it will show up in court and action would be taken as appropriate. However, unless that happens, I think it is time for all Americans to come together and move this country forward. The Electoral College met today and certified the election for Biden. God bless America!
The "expert" behind the report was hired by the Trump campaign and is from a Dallas-based firm that has no expertise in election administration or technology but does have a history of amplifying fake documents. Oh yeah, he is also the same idiot who confused districts in Minnesota and Michigan in a previous court case, as the Detroit Free Press reports:
"Ramsland, a cybersecurity analyst and former Republican congressional candidate, mistook voting jurisdictions in Minnesota for Michigan towns in one recent flawed analysis of voter turnout in the Nov. 3 election. In another, filed in support of a federal lawsuit filed in Michigan, he made wildly inaccurate claims about voter turnout in various Michigan municipalities claiming that Detroit, where turnout was 51%, had turnout of 139%, and that North Muskegon, which had turnout of 78%, had voter turnout of 782%."
Here's what the state of Michigan's Election Elections Director said of the report: it "makes a series of unsupported conclusions, ascribes motives of fraud and obfuscation to processes that are easily explained as routine election procedures or error corrections, and suggests without explanation that elements of election software not used in Michigan are somehow responsible for tabulation or reporting errors that are either nonexistent or easily explained."
https://www.freep.com/story/news/po...spute-report-antrim-county-voting/6538325002/
As the election administrator notes in this article, all ballots in Michigan are marked by hand so if the Trump campaign had any actual evidence of fraud, they could have asked for a hand recount of every ballot in the state, which they never did. Regardless, just to be totally transparent, the Michigan Bureau of Elections and Antrim County will be conducting a hand tally of ballots to confirm the results. As a reminder, when Georgia did a hand recount of their ballots, the results matched the machine results.
Just amazing to me that after like 25 of these kooky conspiracy theories have been debunked, you credulous goobs keep getting all excited about the next one.
Anyways the forensic audit that just had the results released showed a 68% error rate & that’s just 1 County that used the Dominion machines. Forensic audit is evidencei suppose you also take issue with all those dumb judges that agree with me. sad what trump has turned you into
will be groundbreaking when it gets to a court. or it's potentially it's all ******** intended to draw your eye away from trump waddling off into the sunset.Anyways the forensic audit that just had the results released showed a 68% error rate & that’s just 1 County that used the Dominion machines. Forensic audit is evidence
Sir, it is over. The Electoral College has voted and the vote has been certified. The procedure has been followed according to the laws of this country. Joe Biden is officially the President Elect. It is time to move our country forward and focus on how we solve the problems facing us, so that we can get back to some form of normalcy. God bless America!I see what you are saying but no it's not that time. This will not be over until one or the other is sworn in. Trump won and it will be conclusively proven before this is over imo.
will be groundbreaking when it gets to a court. or it's potentially it's all ******** intended to draw your eye away from trump waddling off into the sunset.
serious question, when did you graduate Clemson? what was your major?
Now let’s do Arizona
Sir, it is over. The Electoral College has voted and the vote has been certified. The procedure has been followed according to the laws of this country. Joe Biden is officially the President Elect. It is time to move our country forward and focus on how we solve the problems facing us, so that we can get back to some form of normalcy. God bless America!
My good sir, I would tell you we've been getting this for the last month and a half.We will all get a lesson on the electoral process and the constitutional provisions for a contested election.
The alternate slate of electors will fail because 1. They are not certified by the state governments and are not official and 2. They would have to be accepted by the Senate AND House, which I think we can all agree won't happen. So, ultimately, I can't see this going anywhere. God bless America!
Y’all so enamored with Trump you think his supporters are too. Bruh y’all’s party wants the green new deal wich will end oil production in our country & make gas prices go through the roof. Also bring back insane regulations that will cripple the economy. Jack taxes back up (yes I pay a Corperate tax). Those are just some headliners. I see here recently Biden is considering making Cuomo the AG. The same Cuomo that is locking down the whole state of NY & still leads the nation in COVID case, deaths or whatever the heck. I can go on & on but that should suffice for the moment. THIS IS WHY I ASK YALL FROM TIME TO TIME WHAT EXITES YALL SO MUCH ABOUT BIDEN WINNING? I’m not trying to debate, I’m asking to see if there’s any bright side I’m not seeing & maybe I can get a little happy but the only answer I’ve gotten so far is Biden gonna handle COVID better (no explanation given but ok) & he’s gonna make it easier to get in college. Ok yea I want Trump to win, sorry if that freaks y’all outThese Trump fanatics are now officially living in la la land
Y’all so enamored with Trump you think his supporters are too. Bruh y’all’s party wants the green new deal wich will end oil production in our country & make gas prices go through the roof. Also bring back insane regulations that will cripple the economy. Jack taxes back up (yes I pay a Corperate tax). Those are just some headliners. I see here recently Biden is considering making Cuomo the AG. The same Cuomo that is locking down the whole state of NY & still leads the nation in COVID case, deaths or whatever the heck. I can go on & on but that should suffice for the moment. THIS IS WHY I ASK YALL FROM TIME TO TIME WHAT EXITES YALL SO MUCH ABOUT BIDEN WINNING? I’m not trying to debate, I’m asking to see if there’s any bright side I’m not seeing & maybe I can get a little happy but the only answer I’ve gotten so far is Biden gonna handle COVID better (no explanation given but ok) & he’s gonna make it easier to get in college. Ok yea I want Trump to win, sorry if that freaks y’all out![]()
I ain’t knocking making college more accessible. Just not on my personal radar anywhere
@Elul77 Can you please tell me who these people are you are sharing the Twitter posts from and what their qualifications are in this field? Without that, it's difficult to determine if I should give any credence to their posts. Thanks.
@Elul77 Can you please tell me who these people are you are sharing the Twitter posts from and what their qualifications are in this field? Without that, it's difficult to determine if I should give any credence to their posts. Thanks.
If you have Twitter click on their profiles. I follow others too but these are the main 2 I’ve been following that seem to know what they’re talking about. Not saying Trump is going to win but I’d be a little surprised is he just went out like ho hum ok Joe you got it bro
The "expert" behind the report was hired by the Trump campaign and is from a Dallas-based firm that has no expertise in election administration or technology but does have a history of amplifying fake documents. Oh yeah, he is also the same idiot who confused districts in Minnesota and Michigan in a previous court case, as the Detroit Free Press reports:
"Ramsland, a cybersecurity analyst and former Republican congressional candidate, mistook voting jurisdictions in Minnesota for Michigan towns in one recent flawed analysis of voter turnout in the Nov. 3 election. In another, filed in support of a federal lawsuit filed in Michigan, he made wildly inaccurate claims about voter turnout in various Michigan municipalities claiming that Detroit, where turnout was 51%, had turnout of 139%, and that North Muskegon, which had turnout of 78%, had voter turnout of 782%."
Here's what the state of Michigan's Election Elections Director said of the report: it "makes a series of unsupported conclusions, ascribes motives of fraud and obfuscation to processes that are easily explained as routine election procedures or error corrections, and suggests without explanation that elements of election software not used in Michigan are somehow responsible for tabulation or reporting errors that are either nonexistent or easily explained."
https://www.freep.com/story/news/po...spute-report-antrim-county-voting/6538325002/
As the election administrator notes in this article, all ballots in Michigan are marked by hand so if the Trump campaign had any actual evidence of fraud, they could have asked for a hand recount of every ballot in the state, which they never did. Regardless, just to be totally transparent, the Michigan Bureau of Elections and Antrim County will be conducting a hand tally of ballots to confirm the results. As a reminder, when Georgia did a hand recount of their ballots, the results matched the machine results.
Just amazing to me that after like 25 of these kooky conspiracy theories have been debunked, you credulous goobs keep getting all excited about the next one.
Apologies, what new information is this tweet meant to provide, beyond what I've already noted?
My good sir, I would tell you we've been getting this for the last month and a half.
If this is real, I expect it will show up in court and action would be taken as appropriate. However, unless that happens, I think it is time for all Americans to come together and move this country forward. The Electoral College met today and certified the election for Biden. God bless America!
https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/donald-trumps-stealthy-road-victory
Donald Trump's Stealthy Road to Victory
| November 6, 2020
- Author:
- Graham Allison
As the counting of votes in Arizona, Georgia, and especially Pennsylvania continues, most of the press and punditry have concluded that Vice President Biden has won the 2020 election. Certainly, a substantial majority of the rest of us are suffering from “election fatigue” and eager for this drama to be over. Without disagreeing with the conventional wisdom about the final tally when all the legal votes are counted, I believe the current consensus is missing the fact that Trump has a second, viable stealthy road to victory.
As the counting of votes in Arizona, Georgia, and especially Pennsylvania continues, most of the press and punditry have concluded that Vice President Biden has won the 2020 election. Certainly, a substantial majority of the rest of us are suffering from “election fatigue” and eager for this drama to be over. Without disagreeing with the conventional wisdom about the final tally when all the legal votes are counted, I believe the current consensus is missing the fact that Trump has a second, viable stealthy road to victory. I’m reluctantly betting that the debate about who won will continue until at least January 6 when slates of electoral college members are opened in Washington, and most likely beyond that as whatever is decided then is appealed by the loser to the Supreme Court. My conclusion reflects the analysis of my colleague in the Applied History Network at the Belfer Center which is below.
As he notes, this stealthy road follows in the footsteps of a number of previous contested American elections, especially the 1876 election that pitted Tilden v. Hayes. Then as now, each state must decide on a group of electors to meet with a joint session of Congress on January 6 where the winner of the presidential election is declared. The normal practice in a state where Biden won the popular-vote total would be for state election officials to certify the results and send a slate of electors to Congress. But state legislatures have the constitutional authority to conclude that the popular vote has been corrupted and thus send a competing slate of electors on behalf of their state. The 12th Amendment to the Constitution specifies that the “President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted.” That means that in the case of disputes about competing electoral slates, the President of the Senate—Vice President Pence—would appear to have the ultimate authority to decide which to accept and which to reject. Pence would choose Trump. Democrats would appeal to the Supreme Court.
Alternatively, if at that point, no candidate has the required 270 electoral votes, the 12th Amendment stipulates, “the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote.” Currently, Republicans have a state delegation majority with 26 of the 50 states and they appear almost certain to keep that majority in the new Congress. A vote of the states would then elect President Trump for a second term. And again, Democrats would appeal that outcome to the Supreme Court.
As the analysis below notes, these issues are even more complex. But to repeat the bottom line: both the words of the 12th Amendment, and historical precedent offer a credible, stealthy, winding road that could lead to Trump’s victory and a second term. Or as the saying goes: the opera ain’t over till the fat lady sings.