Another take....R things actually that bad?

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
249,364
178,671
113
It was exactly as Choppin described and the ref blew the call. Why would you defend it ? Horrendous take by you as it impacted the game. In fact , as I was texting my Illinois buddy during the game , I told him it was a ******** bad call and it was the BIG 10 refs gift to let Illinois back in the game.

He reached in unnecessarily and got called...
 

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
He reached in unnecessarily and got called...

I just went back and rewatched it multiple times, at full speed and slow motion.

The ball went into Omoruyi, who held it over his head and was defended by Hawkins. Harris came over and doubled, hitting Omoruyi on the arm and in the face with no call. Hawkins knocked the ball loose, and both Harris and Omoruyi tried to get it - it was at this point where it looked like Omoruyi may have hit Harris in the hand while going for the ball.

The ref was right there and watched passively, making no motion and no call on that contact. That was the only thing that could have been considered a "reach" - and it wasn't called. So, it was NOT a reach-in foul.

The ball bounced toward the sideline and both Harris and Omoruyi went after it. Harris got to it first, and Omoruyi stopped and put both hands in the air, his hip/thigh coming into contact with Harris' shoulder as Harris corralled the ball. Again, no call/movement by the ref, who has been clearly in frame of the camera the entire time.

Harris then started his dribble into Omoruyi's hip and puts his forearm on Omoruyi's body, who was not moving and had both hands over his head. Omoruyi realized he no longer had a play on the ball, and turned to run up court.

THIS is when the ref called the foul, just as he slipped out of frame.

So, not a reach in foul at all. The only thing I can think of that the ref may have called was that Omoruyi fouled Harris with his body, but Omoruyi was immobile at that point and Harris initiated the contact.

Omoruyi was understandably confused at the whistle, turning around as he got to half court wondering what had happened.

I'm sure you have it on DVR and can go back and watch it yourself. Omoruyi got the ball at 13:59 and the foul was called at 13:55.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,252
12,531
113
For me 3 is guaranteed

Just 2 wins puts it as uncertain on selection sunday..dont want to deal with that
I doubt a 11-9 league record will result in a top four league ranking and a NCAA 6/7 seeding .There are going to be too many B1G Ten teams with comparable records and more than 10 total losses .
 

kcg88

Heisman
Aug 11, 2017
10,862
17,230
0
On a raw efficiency basis in league play Rutgers is #4 and has played one of the more difficult schedules.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

RUChoppin

Heisman
Dec 1, 2006
19,270
13,695
0
On a raw efficiency basis in league play Rutgers is #4 and has played one of the more difficult schedules.



Mag was a big part of that, though - our numbers aren't so rosy without him. He had a .534 eFG% (second to Spencer's .541), a .500 FG% (second to Omoruyi's .504), and a .571 TS% (second to Spencer's .589). Defense is harder to quantify, but he was the tip of the spear on our backcourt pressure and the best trap defender on the team.

Thankfully the final 6 games are "easier", but we'll see how our efficiency numbers look over the last 8 games of the season before heading into the conference tournament.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

rubjk

All-Conference
Dec 16, 2013
2,283
4,921
113
Michigan isnt a gimme, theyre playing better right now and we always struggle vs them to begin with.

Our team severely lacks talent. Imo its a miracle that pikes been able to even get them to this point. I didnt think wed win more than 8 big ten games. The fact were safely in the tourney right now is nuts. Win 3 more and were in
It’s not all about stars/talent. NW was supposed to do less than us. Sometimes team dynamics and coaching matter too as does experience.