America's 250th

Sep 12, 2020
362
306
58
Very difficult to hold a conversation when the other side won't even define socialism. They think if someone is nice to the poor, gives to the poor, or if anyone takes assistance - bam, there's socialism! Jesus a socialist? That's always been a favorite claim of people who don't even claim to follow him. They sure are good at telling us who He was though.

If you put a group of 10 on the right in separate rooms I believe you'd have the same definition of socialism from all 10, maybe 8 or 9 of them. You put a group of 10 on the left in separate rooms and ask them to define socialism and well.... as we can see on this board, you might get 8 or 9 different responses.
Yup, being virtuous must mean you’re a socialist. It’s just lazy.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SuperBigFan69

TruHusker

All-Conference
Sep 21, 2001
12,129
2,417
98
Is there anything more socialist then giving farmers checks just for being a farmer? It makes me laugh reading people like you talk about how the sky is falling because of NYC, while ignoring the blatant socialism in your own community. So common in this country today. Everyone is fine with socialism until someone who they don't like benefits.

This country has problems, always has, always will, but it is still great, despite what the drama queens on all sides say.
Well, it should be "more socialist than giving farmers..." but I regress. There is a big difference between social programs and the entire governing system being socialist. Specifically, there are several commodities that had wild swings for several years and they had an adverse affect on the economy. Such as food, oil and gas. The attempt is to avoid the peaks and valleys and maintain a steady supply for the consumer without boom and bust which is hard to do. Perhaps you are old enough to recall, I was living in Grand Island when they came out with the Pic Certificates for farmers. Essentially the farmer agreed not to plant corn in exchange for these certificates. Farmers had no input costs and many didn't plant and I recall, although all of this is a bit foggy from old age, that was a wet spring and summer and very little irrigation was used. I just remember many stories of farmers taking off on vacations they never had during that time of year. That is just one example.
 

SuperBigFan69

All-American
Apr 17, 2021
6,035
5,407
113
Yep let one of these Liberal fks switch lives with anyone of our Foreign visitors here for the World Cup for 6 months. Then come back and see what America is like now.
Amen! People visiting here seemed so impressed and fell in love with America.

And ranch dressing...so many people had it for the first time!
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuskerInCarolina

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,237
2,439
113
Is there anything more socialist then giving farmers checks just for being a farmer? It makes me laugh reading people like you talk about how the sky is falling because of NYC, while ignoring the blatant socialism in your own community. So common in this country today. Everyone is fine with socialism until someone who they don't like benefits.

This country has problems, always has, always will, but it is still great, despite what the drama queens on all sides say.
How can it be socialism when the public doesn't own the means of production?

You don't see the difference between farmers still having to work hard and the government providing them a little bit of money to stabilize food prices / prevent mass bankruptcies vs the government owning the means, production & operations of grocery stores & housing?

I'm not saying the former is right, just that's it's not socialism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,237
2,439
113
Haha Tons of businesses and people negatively affected by governmental policy. They don't get check after check. I would say they do indeed get checks for just being farmers. I just wanted to point that out, since amazingly I didn’t see it in your anti-socialism rant.
You do realize you'd only be a farmers for 7, maybe 9 months if you sat back and collected subsidy checks for "just being a farmer".

With true welfare, yes, you can sit back, do nothing and collect some money. The same can't be said with farming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinglefritz

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,237
2,439
113
I would encourage you to actually read that Webster definition. Part of socialism is the distribution of wealth.

Just because part of socialism is the distribution of wealth doesn't mean it's actually socialism. That's like saying giving a Christmas gift is a form of socialism. It wouldn't be, not even close, as socialism has to involve other factors than just "distribution of wealth" in order for it to be considered socialism.
 

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,237
2,439
113
Well, it should be "more socialist than giving farmers..." but I regress. There is a big difference between social programs and the entire governing system being socialist. Specifically, there are several commodities that had wild swings for several years and they had an adverse affect on the economy. Such as food, oil and gas. The attempt is to avoid the peaks and valleys and maintain a steady supply for the consumer without boom and bust which is hard to do. Perhaps you are old enough to recall, I was living in Grand Island when they came out with the Pic Certificates for farmers. Essentially the farmer agreed not to plant corn in exchange for these certificates. Farmers had no input costs and many didn't plant and I recall, although all of this is a bit foggy from old age, that was a wet spring and summer and very little irrigation was used. I just remember many stories of farmers taking off on vacations they never had during that time of year. That is just one example.
Vacation for Grand Island farmers is taking their family to Island Oasis or the Hall County Fair.
 

Killersker47

Junior
Jul 3, 2025
313
208
43
The US as we know is cooked. A Mossad/Epstein compromised pedophile grifter who funnels in billions in crypto bribes is now the brand. Who incidentally got bent over the barrel by Iran in service of giving them 300 billion and doubling your gas prices while the smooth brains (well represented on this board) cheer on our collective demise because OwNiNg tHe lIbS.

You have the country you deserve. Dorks.
Well in your screen name, you are a “***”
 

Big bo fan

All-American
Jan 8, 2019
19,552
6,844
113
Correct my if I’m wrong, but isn’t my free healthcare at the VA technically a socialist principle? I don’t agree with most socialist principles, but I’m grateful for that one. Downside, it’s not the best quality. Though, the Omaha VA was phenomenal.
You earned that in return for the service you gave to our country.
 
  • Love
Reactions: HuskerInCarolina

huskerj12

Heisman
Oct 3, 2007
16,224
11,927
113
I find it hard to get hyped up for the 4th of July like I always used to now that our leaders for most of the past decade are so fundamentally anti-American, and are intentionally destroying so much of what we were always taught was amazing about our country. It’s like living in bizarro world.

I mean this is a perfect example - half of our country believes this exact same thing because they are told it over and over and over by the media they consume. We see posts about what a dangerous hellhole American cities are on this site all the time! Haha. It's really really hard to break through the propaganda. Way too many of our fellow citizens genuinely believe things that are just not at all true, and get further and further radicalized. It's hard to come back from that.



Anyway, I still celebrated all weekend with my 5 year old daughter and had plenty of fun, and the fact that she's just starting to learn about American history and what our country is supposed to stand for got me feeling more patriotic than I had in awhile. She and her generation deserve a version of America that represents the real American values that so many people fought for over the past 250 years, and that way too many of us always took for granted.
 

SuperBigFan69

All-American
Apr 17, 2021
6,035
5,407
113
If you were unable to celebrate the 4th because you were busy or you don't have friends or don't have friends with a boat and/or lake house...that is one thing.

If you refused to celebrate the 4th because of some sort of "principle" you are a dork.
 

Big bo fan

All-American
Jan 8, 2019
19,552
6,844
113
I find it hard to get hyped up for the 4th of July like I always used to now that our leaders for most of the past decade are so fundamentally anti-American, and are intentionally destroying so much of what we were always taught was amazing about our country. It’s like living in bizarro world.

I mean this is a perfect example - half of our country believes this exact same thing because they are told it over and over and over by the media they consume. We see posts about what a dangerous hellhole American cities are on this site all the time! Haha. It's really really hard to break through the propaganda. Way too many of our fellow citizens genuinely believe things that are just not at all true, and get further and further radicalized. It's hard to come back from that.



Anyway, I still celebrated all weekend with my 5 year old daughter and had plenty of fun, and the fact that she's just starting to learn about American history and what our country is supposed to stand for got me feeling more patriotic than I had in awhile. She and her generation deserve a version of America that represents the real American values that so many people fought for over the past 250 years, and that way too many of us always took for granted.
Two things can be true at the same time. There are cities in America that are Hell holes in spots of the city and other spots in the same city are really nice. Also unfortunately there are people who believe EVERYTHING they see or hear on social media and regularly media .
 

SuperBigFan69

All-American
Apr 17, 2021
6,035
5,407
113
Two things can be true at the same time. There are cities in America that are Hell holes in spots of the city and other spots in the same city are really nice. Also unfortunately there are people who believe EVERYTHING they see or hear on social media and regularly media .
So true!

You can be in Chicago and in Wriglyville, having the best ******* time...and you can go about 8 blocks over and things change very very fast.
 

Big bo fan

All-American
Jan 8, 2019
19,552
6,844
113
So true!

You can be in Chicago and in Wriglyville, having the best ******* time...and you can go about 8 blocks over and things change very very fast.
We went to one of the Orange Bowls in Miami at the original stadium.wr got there early and asked a cop we wanted to go look for sovereigns and food . He told us you can go 3-4 blocks East, west and north and you would be OK. But if you go 1 block south they wouldn’t be good .
 
  • Like
Reactions: SuperBigFan69

Huskers12345

Senior
Aug 23, 2025
753
867
93
How can it be socialism when the public doesn't own the means of production?

You don't see the difference between farmers still having to work hard and the government providing them a little bit of money to stabilize food prices / prevent mass bankruptcies vs the government owning the means, production & operations of grocery stores & housing?

I'm not saying the former is right, just that's it's not socialism.
First off, the government cutting checks to grain farmers does little for our food supply. Roughly 40% of corn goes to ethanol. Realistically it probably has the opposite effect by encouraging less farm diversification.

The same government also, on an annual basis, pays for a large percentage of crop insurance subsidies. USDA also buys grain. USDA issues loans. And so on. It's a wee bit more than cutting a check every couple of years. The government is embedded in grain farming, from start to finish.

So, the government might not own the whole agricultural chain, but they sure are a lot more involved than people here want to acknowledge.

If people want to stick to a rigid definition, more power to you.
 

Huskers12345

Senior
Aug 23, 2025
753
867
93
Just because part of socialism is the distribution of wealth doesn't mean it's actually socialism. That's like saying giving a Christmas gift is a form of socialism. It wouldn't be, not even close, as socialism has to involve other factors than just "distribution of wealth" in order for it to be considered socialism.
A person giving a present is far different from the government finacially propping up a whole group of people, year after year, for what is now starting to encompass generations.
 

dinglefritz

Heisman
Jan 14, 2011
51,874
13,404
78
First off, the government cutting checks to grain farmers does little for our food supply. Roughly 40% of corn goes to ethanol. Realistically it probably has the opposite effect by encouraging less farm diversification.

The same government also, on an annual basis, pays for a large percentage of crop insurance subsidies. USDA also buys grain. USDA issues loans. And so on. It's a wee bit more than cutting a check every couple of years. The government is embedded in grain farming, from start to finish.

So, the government might not own the whole agricultural chain, but they sure are a lot more involved than people here want to acknowledge.

If people want to stick to a rigid definition, more power to you.
One fact that is commonly over looked is the value of other products of ethanol production. Distillers grains DRAMATICALLY increase the efficiency of cattle when fed as a protein source. That decreases or eliminates the need for protein in the form of soybean meal and alfalfa. You can formulate rations for beef cows using distillers by-products and corn stalks with no other plant material. Additionally corn oil is extracted from the corn and can be refined for human consumption, commercial purposes or biofuel.

Ethanol production today is at a point where it can exist without government subsidies. The one thing it needs now is for government (EPA) to get out of the way of higher blends. No doubt a huge amount of corn is used for ethanol but there’s way more benefit from that than the ethanol produced.
 
  • Like
Reactions: litespeedhuskerfan

o_Balfor

Senior
May 31, 2022
524
443
63
Just because part of socialism is the distribution of wealth doesn't mean it's actually socialism. That's like saying giving a Christmas gift is a form of socialism. It wouldn't be, not even close, as socialism has to involve other factors than just "distribution of wealth" in order for it to be considered socialism.
Lol. It's not at all like saying that.
 

o_Balfor

Senior
May 31, 2022
524
443
63
If you were unable to celebrate the 4th because you were busy or you don't have friends or don't have friends with a boat and/or lake house...that is one thing.

If you refused to celebrate the 4th because of some sort of "principle" you are a dork.
As a self-identifying dork, I don't appreciate you lumping them in with me.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SuperBigFan69
Sep 12, 2020
362
306
58
First off, the government cutting checks to grain farmers does little for our food supply. Roughly 40% of corn goes to ethanol. Realistically it probably has the opposite effect by encouraging less farm diversification.

The same government also, on an annual basis, pays for a large percentage of crop insurance subsidies. USDA also buys grain. USDA issues loans. And so on. It's a wee bit more than cutting a check every couple of years. The government is embedded in grain farming, from start to finish.

So, the government might not own the whole agricultural chain, but they sure are a lot more involved than people here want to acknowledge.

If people want to stick to a rigid definition, more power to you.
Yes, the actual meaning of words, who needs it, amiright? It's such a hassle. Why would anyone ever take anything you say seriously when you can't understand, or don't want to accept, the meaning of words?
 

SuperBigFan69

All-American
Apr 17, 2021
6,035
5,407
113
Just because part of socialism is the distribution of wealth doesn't mean it's actually socialism. That's like saying giving a Christmas gift is a form of socialism. It wouldn't be, not even close, as socialism has to involve other factors than just "distribution of wealth" in order for it to be considered socialism.

Yes, the actual meaning of words, who needs it, amiright? It's such a hassle. Why would anyone ever take anything you say seriously when you can't understand, or don't want to accept, the meaning of words?
Are both of you saying that you want to live by "exact words" because there was a Brady Bunch episode that showed how that works out.
 
  • Love
Reactions: litespeedhuskerfan

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,237
2,439
113
First off, the government cutting checks to grain farmers does little for our food supply. Roughly 40% of corn goes to ethanol. Realistically it probably has the opposite effect by encouraging less farm diversification.

The same government also, on an annual basis, pays for a large percentage of crop insurance subsidies. USDA also buys grain. USDA issues loans. And so on. It's a wee bit more than cutting a check every couple of years. The government is embedded in grain farming, from start to finish.

So, the government might not own the whole agricultural chain, but they sure are a lot more involved than people here want to acknowledge.

If people want to stick to a rigid definition, more power to you.
I agree with pretty much everything you said.

Your very last sentence is funny to me. "a rigid definition". You mean the actual definition, right? Not some watered down, loosey goosey definition where most things could be considered "socialism".
 

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,237
2,439
113
A person giving a present is far different from the government finacially propping up a whole group of people, year after year, for what is now starting to encompass generations.
Yes, exactly. But if you narrowed down "socialism" to a super simple definition then you can make the argument (using that same simple & lame definition) that gift giving is a form of socialism.

Like if someone were to say, "Part of socialism is the distribution of wealth." and made that their point as to why farm subsidies is socialism. Well, that would be silly.