Alt - Left fighting racism.
- Thread starter PriddyBoy
- Start date
VIDEO: Racist Alt-Left Thugs Punch Black Trump Supporter in Face Outside Phoenix Rally
I think he meant, was it the black guy behind Trump during his speech with a "Blacks For Trump" sign. Was it the same guy, is what he's asking.
Yes we do, both sides.
Does BLM, La Rassa, The Nation, Black Panthers and Antifa not qualify as arbiters of hate in your world?
There are some bad apples in BLM but there are also a lot of good people in BLM. They have had two rallies in Charleston, WV the last two Sunday evenings and both were peaceful with no incidents.
This is obviously a big issue for you. I have faith in your knowledge of the Black Panthers founding. I agree that there are hate groups that tout racist attitudes about white People as well.
But I think it's concerning that you continue to say "both sides" what are these two sides? Conservative v. Liberal, white v. Minority?
If you read Keyser's post that I responded to, and others he has made it seems clear he has been defining the sides as Republican and Democrats. Why is it concerning that I accurately reflect reality and oppose being lumped into a segment of supporters to which I am in vehement disagreement with. I'll not allow the liberal narrative of Conservatives and Republicans as being racists to go unchecked when I see it.
So defining them as peaceful means they're ok? Same logic apply to the Klan and Nazis?
To be clear, I detest pretty much all of the groups we're discussing right now, so spare me with the old chestnut that I'm defending the Klan and Nazis. I'm attacking hypocrisy.
I just think it's unreasonable that everything has to be separated into one of two sides.
I know it's a tough concept for you to grasp, but yeah, peaceful people are ok.
Nazis and Klansmen are not peaceful people. Sorry sweety, facts are a *****.
Clearly, you are. Let me calibrate you.
The conversation began with Keyser making the idiotic claim of racists only being in the GOP. I correctly pointed out that both sides have racists and individuals who deal in hate and named those parties mostly associated with the left.
You next came to the defense of BLM stating they've had some peaceful rallies. Fine, I believe that's possible and likely. However, using the liberal logic that you are the company you keep, those peaceful BLM folks are lumped in with the Cop Killing, white race extinguishing radicals. Using your specific logic, they aren't an organization of hate because they had 2 peaceful protests last weekend. There are numerous peaceful Klan protests where they aren't injuring or damaging property or being challenged by counter protestors. Thus, despite their message being hate filled, it was "peaceful" in occurrence and qualifying as an acceptable comparative with your example.
Moreover, I'm not the one defending an organization of hate. I'm condemning both sides for their intolerance. You, however, find the glorification of cop killing and the extermination of the White Race as acceptable it would seem as you're defending BLM. Despite their initial message and the good intentions they had, the organization has been hijacked into one of hate.
Antifa are not peaceful Look up berkley, Ca, in case you have forgotten. They challenged the KKK, a hateful group to be sure, looking for a fight. They got one.
I wonder if you ever stop and think that you have literally become an ideological *****? A mere cog in a political propaganda wheel? You have literally posted that you feel giving women the right to vote was bad for democracy, and you want me to believe you have never raised a hand to a woman in your life? I know I haven't, and I think anyone that doesn't think a woman should have the right to vote is working with an underdeveloped mind. Antifa, BLM, La Raza are groups seeking radical solutions to racial and political problems. Being a liberal doesn't mean I agree with their message or methods. And your photoshopped propaganda doesn't persuade anyone.
Says the 99.9% liberal poster. .1% is to deceive. Smoke screen is not too convincing.
Ouch! I guess you figured me out. I use a "smokescreen" on a db for what purpose again?