All-time wins

JeepCSC_anon

Sophomore
Nov 17, 2005
178
136
0
We have played more games but we play in a tougher league. The Big 8/12 has always been among the best.
League toughness is a layer to the conversation. Kansas’ most played opponents since 1950 are K State (69%), Iowa State (71%), and Oklahoma (71%). UNC’s is Duke (54%), NC State (67%), and Wake Forest (68%). If we swapped the winning percentage on just these programs, Kansas would have 40 less wins and UNC would have 41 more. For those keeping track at home, that would mean 2364-2317 ADV Heels. And that’s just if you did it with the three most common opponents.

The point being that it’s complicated trying to factor in who played who, and how that changes an all-time list. It’s why the NCAA tournament results are given precedence, as that levels the playing field now in this era of expanded tournament. Titles, FFs, tourney wins, etc come first. All-time wins follow simply as an interesting counting stat that everyone can appreciate without context, but doesn’t add much to a conversation. The rest is just fan noise.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FurdTurgason

wildcat111

All-Conference
Dec 9, 2020
1,533
1,727
113
Am I the only one who doesn't care that much that Kansas passed us? I mean, don't they have 100 plus more losses than we do, too? Even Dean Smith, when UNC briefly passed us in the early 90s, said that winning percentage was a bigger deal.
How many more excuses you got for losing. Don't you know we are the gold standard; the no excuse program; and always eat first?