Why can't it be O'Connell and Goldwire? Is the team better with Allen at point and O'Connell in the game or Allen at the 2 with Goldwire running point? The team is better with Allen off ball.
There's no reason to think O'Connell or whoever can't spell Trent or even Allen, if he gets breaks and Goldwire for Duval.
The problem is the two being discussed now for the minutes were afterthoughts 2 weeks ago. Don't forget Jack White either guys. He's no scrub.
Why can't it be O'Connell and Goldwire? Is the team better with Allen at point and O'Connell in the game or Allen at the 2 with Goldwire running point? The team is better with Allen off ball.
There's no reason to think O'Connell or whoever can't spell Trent or even Allen, if he gets breaks and Goldwire for Duval.
The problem is the two being discussed now for the minutes were afterthoughts 2 weeks ago. Don't forget Jack White either guys. He's no scrub.
Why can't it be O'Connell and Goldwire? Is the team better with Allen at point and O'Connell in the game or Allen at the 2 with Goldwire running point? The team is better with Allen off ball.
There's no reason to think O'Connell or whoever can't spell Trent or even Allen, if he gets breaks and Goldwire for Duval.
The problem is the two being discussed now for the minutes were afterthoughts 2 weeks ago. Don't forget Jack White either guys. He's no scrub.
While I agree with everyone. I do like seeing Goldwire, O'Connell and Javin getting minutes in the first half and second. I can see it two ways:
We go up in the first and K goes to the bench to let the guys breath or we get down and K leaves the starters in to work it out themselves.
I hoping for the first of the two.
He was saying if the rotation was limited to 8, he thought Alex had the edge on JG for the 8th spot. I think most of us would be pleased if they were both able to contribute regularly and meaningfully and we had a rotation of 9. Some of us would be surprised, though, just b/c it's not K's tendency, and would rather prepare for the rotation to be cut to 8 by not getting our hopes up.Why can't it be O'Connell and Goldwire? Is the team better with Allen at point and O'Connell in the game or Allen at the 2 with Goldwire running point? The team is better with Allen off ball.
There's no reason to think O'Connell or whoever can't spell Trent or even Allen, if he gets breaks and Goldwire for Duval.
The problem is the two being discussed now for the minutes were afterthoughts 2 weeks ago. Don't forget Jack White either guys. He's no scrub.
I don't want them to average that many minutes per night, but I want them capable of playing 45 minutes per game, if necessary. Playing well in the last minute of OT will depend more on having been pushed hard for as many minutes as possible sometimes more than it will depend on having been rested a lot.i just hope G and duval aren't playing 35 36 mins a game every night. think goldmember and AO can give 8-10mins a game.
I see what you're saying. I'm not one of those minute watchers. If we need Grayson to play 40 to win, he will. That's not the issue, nor is seeing 10 guys play. I do believe Goldwire running the point for 2-3 minutes, if Duval goes to bench, is better than 2-3 minutes of Grayson running the point. To me it's putting best options out there. Goldwire has proven to be a better player than most thought. He's more than a practice player. There's a drop off from Duval to him, sure, but in my opinion there's more of a drop off if Grayson slides to point.He was saying if the rotation was limited to 8, he thought Alex had the edge on JG for the 8th spot. I think most of us would be pleased if they were both able to contribute regularly and meaningfully and we had a rotation of 9. Some of us would be surprised, though, just b/c it's not K's tendency, and would rather prepare for the rotation to be cut to 8 by not getting our hopes up.
Grayson isn't as natural a distributor as JG, but he's way ahead of him in experience, leadership, scoring, overall offense, and even defense. If he runs point while Trevon rests, we'll see more iso and fewer overall assists, but it won't be a disaster for 10 minutes or so per game.
I've been pleasantly surprised by JG. I hope he earns time throughout the season. If I'm doing the guessing, I don't think he'll be a better option than Grayson for a few minutes. If he does earn consistent minutes, great! Either way, K's choice has a 99% chance of being the best choice.I do believe Goldwire running the point for 2-3 minutes, if Duval goes to bench, is better than 2-3 minutes of Grayson running the point. To me it's putting best options out there. Goldwire has proven to be a better player than most thought. He's more than a practice player. There's a drop off from Duval to him, sure, but in my opinion there's more of a drop off if Grayson slides to point.
This team has the potential to be really good, and yes we seem to have two good passing bigs, but every good team has a solid point guard. If Duke is going to be really good, Duval must be good so Allen can do his thing from the shooting guard spot.I think a lot of this "true PG" talk is pointless (haha) with this team. Duval isn't CP3 in terms of running a team, but in the first two games it's everyone's willingness to make one more pass that's been great. Couple that with the fact that almost everyone is a threat in one way or another and there will be lots of assist regardless. Hell, the 2 beat passer/playmakers on the team are Bagley and Carter. Just about anyone can throw it to one of them in the post...not PG required. Then spread out and watch the magic happen.
I see what you're saying. I'm not one of those minute watchers. If we need Grayson to play 40 to win, he will. That's not the issue, nor is seeing 10 guys play. I do believe Goldwire running the point for 2-3 minutes, if Duval goes to bench, is better than 2-3 minutes of Grayson running the point. To me it's putting best options out there. Goldwire has proven to be a better player than most thought. He's more than a practice player. There's a drop off from Duval to him, sure, but in my opinion there's more of a drop off if Grayson slides to point.
This team has the potential to be really good, and yes we seem to have two good passing bigs, but every good team has a solid point guard. If Duke is going to be really good, Duval must be good so Allen can do his thing from the shooting guard spot.
unCHEAT fans are gonna hate him. Nuff said. OFC
That alone makes me like the kid! He's going to drive them crazy.
I agree with what you're saying. Fast breaks or whatever can be done with several guys. All I'm saying is Duke is at its best if Allen isn't the Primary Ballhandler. He is our leader, best player, but as a point guard I think we have 2 guys better than him.I agree that Duval is essential to ultimate success. I guess all I was trying to say was the times when Grayson might be the PG on paper, does not necessarily exclude him from playing off the ball. There will be many ways for this team to initiate offense in a break situation or the half court.
He is our leader, best player, but as a point guard I think we have 2 guys better than him.
I am very impressed with him so far. But if the strength and conditioning staff can get him to 185 by next season, they should win whatever award there is for best crew. Alex is VERY thin right now. He looks to me to have quite a ways to go to get to 185.Alex checks all the boxes except for eye test bc he is so thin. Early on, K said that Alex put on 15lbs. We won't see him getting any stronger as the season goes on but in the off season then next year he should be around 185.
All I'm saying is Duke is at its best if Allen isn't the Primary Ballhandler.
He is our leader, best player, but as a point guard I think we have 2 guys better than him.
It's situational. If it's really close last 5 minutes of a game and Duval has fouled out, plug Allen in at point, sure. If Trent is in similar situation with Duval, or has 4 fouls, plug Goldwire in at point to save Trent for the last couple. At this point, crunch time is only time I'm skeptical of Goldwire running the point. These are scenarios that could happen, it's just my take that Grayson should be off ball as much as possible. I have no problem with Goldwire running point with 10-12 minutes left.Agree 100%.
Disagree here. And I don't think it's close. Grayson is much, much better than Jordan Goldwire as a point guard....right now, today. Grayson is an exceptional talent, he's a senior, he's tougher, better getting to the basket, a better shooter and he's versatile. Again, I'm not saying for 35 minutes a night that best suits him, but for 10, even 15 minutes a game, I feel Grayson gives us more than Jordan Goldwire. The only reason I think people prefer Goldwire in that role is because he's a "natural" point guard. I just don't think that makes him a better one.
It's situational. If it's really close last 5 minutes of a game and Duval has fouled out, plug Allen in at point, sure. If Trent is in similar situation with Duval, or has 4 fouls, plug Goldwire in at point to save Trent for the last couple. At this point, crunch time is only time I'm skeptical of Goldwire running the point. These are scenarios that could happen, it's just my take that Grayson should be off ball as much as possible. I have no problem with Goldwire running point with 10-12 minutes left.
This is similar to the minutes debate. If Duke is up 4-6 with 5 to go and Grayson hasn't had a break, then he better not go out. Any game that's very competitive, I want to see #3 on the court, and if Duval is lights out, keep him out there too, especially last 10-12 of a game.
Well, Bobby Hurley looked like a scrawny little crybaby ******* when he walked onto campus. He kicked *** as long as *** lasts. Looks ain't everything.